| Literature DB >> 20618993 |
Lingan Kong1, Fahong Wang, Bo Feng, Shengdong Li, Jisheng Si, Bin Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In wheat (Triticum aestivum L), the flag leaf has been thought of as the main source of assimilates for grain growth, whereas the peduncle has commonly been thought of as a transporting organ. The photosynthetic characteristics of the exposed peduncle have therefore been neglected. In this study, we investigated the anatomical traits of the exposed peduncle during wheat grain ontogenesis, and we compared the exposed peduncle to the flag leaf with respect to chloroplast ultrastructure, photosystem II (PSII) quantum yield, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase; EC 4.1.1.31) activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20618993 PMCID: PMC3017821 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Anatomical features of the wheat exposed peduncle. (A) Semithin section showing the anatomical structure of the centre of an exposed peduncle at stage 2 (the milk-development stage). (B) Higher magnification of the area highlighted in (A) showing chlorenchyma cells that are rich in chloroplasts. (C) Semithin section showing anatomical structure of the middle part of an exposed peduncle at stage 4 (the hard dough-development stage). (D) Magnified micrograph of the pane in (C) showing the decline in the number of chloroplasts in the chlorenchyma cells and stomata on the epidermis. (E) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the middle part of an exposed peduncle showing that the stomata are arranged axially in rows. (F) SEM images showing the morphology of the stomata. Chl: chloroplast, CS: chlorenchyma strand, Ep: epidermis, GP = ground parenchyma, Sc: sclerenchyma, St: stomata, and VS = vascular strand. Bars: (A and C), 200 μm; (E), 100 μm; (B, D and F), 30 μm.
Figure 2Transmission electron micrographs showing the ultrastructure of the chloroplast at different stages in flag leaves (A-F) and exposed peduncles (G-P). (A, G and H): stage 1; (B, I and J): stage 2; (C, K and L): stage 3, (D, M and N): stage 4; (E, F, O and P): stage 5. (H), (J), (L), (N) and (P): higher magnification of the area highlighted in (G), (I), (K), (M) and (O), respectively. Stages 1-5 correspond (respectively) to the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development stage and the ripening stage. Bars: (A-D), 2 μm; (E, G, I, K, M, O), 5 μm; (F, H, J, L, N, P), 1 μm. CW, cell wall; En, envelop; G, granum; Mt, mitochondrion; Pg, plastoglobuli; S, starch; Th, thylakoid.
Temporal changes in the chloroplast ultrastructure of the flag leaf and the exposed peduncle of wheat.
| Developmental stage1 | Number of chloroplasts per mm2 cell profile | Number of starch grains per chloroplast profile | Number of plastoglobuli per chloroplast profile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flag leaf | Exposed peduncle | Flag leaf | Exposed peduncle | Flag leaf | Exposed peduncle | |
| 1 | 68.02 ± 7.16a2,5 | 89.95 ± 8.12a | 2.21 ± 0.38a3 | 0 | 7.83 ± 2.34d4 | 9.82 ± 2.08c |
| 2 | 65.47 ± 6.71a | 87.30 ± 8.54a | 2.27 ± 0.24a | 0 | 10.69 ± 2.79d | 12.27 ± 3.03bc |
| 3 | 56.85 ± 5.44b | 76.95 ± 6.83b | 1.24 ± 0.31b | 0 | 24.74 ± 5.64c | 14.60 ± 4.14b |
| 4 | 33.86 ± 4.29c | 55.84 ± 6.47c | 0.28 ± 0.10c | 0 | 42.56 ± 7.43b | 19.65 ± 4.37a |
| 5 | 14.42 ± 2.02d | 21.28 ± 2.59d | 0 ± 0d | 0 | 70.44 ± 11.83a | 23.49 ± 3.56a |
1 Stages 1-5 correspond to the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development stage and the ripening stage, respectively.
2 Values given are the mean ± standard deviation for four plants (>10 mm2 of sections were recorded from each plant).
3 Values given are the mean ± standard deviation for four plants (>30 cells with the largest dimension were recorded from each plant).
4 Values given are the mean ± standard deviation for four plants (>50 chloroplasts with the largest dimension were recorded from each plant).
5 Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different by a Tukey test (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Changes in the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters . Each data point in the figure represents the average and the standard deviation of at least 10 individually selected and analysed leaves. F/F: maximum PSII quantum yield; ΦPSII: effective PSII quantum yield. Stages 1-5 correspond (respectively) to the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development stage and the ripening stage.
Figure 4Representative pseudocolour images showing . Numbers 1-5 correspond (respectively) to the following developmental stages: the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development stage and the ripening stage. F/F: maximum PSII quantum yield; ΦPSII: effective PSII quantum yield. Bar = 5 cm.
Figure 5Temporal changes in phospho. Stages 1-5 correspond (respectively) to the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development stage and the ripening stage.
Effect of darkening the exposed peduncle at the end of anthesis on grain dry mass (g ear-1) during grain-filling.
| Treatment | Developmental stage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Non-darkened (control) | 0 | 0.12 ± 0.01a2 | 0.61 ± 0.04a | 1.14 ± 0.05a*3 | 1.38 ± 0.06a** |
| Exposed peduncle darkened | 0 | 0.12 ± 0.01a | 0.59 ± 0.03a | 1.07 ± 0.04b | 1.26 ± 0.06b |
1Stages 1-5 correspond to the end of anthesis, the milk-development stage, the soft dough-development stage, the hard dough-development and the ripening stage, respectively.
2 Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different by a Tukey test (P < 0.05).
3 * and ** indicate significance at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.