Literature DB >> 26052083

Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS.

Charlotte Nettekoven1, Lukas J Volz2, Martha Leimbach2, Eva-Maria Pool1, Anne K Rehme1, Simon B Eickhoff3, Gereon R Fink1, Christian Grefkes4.   

Abstract

The responsiveness to non-invasive neuromodulation protocols shows high inter-individual variability, the reasons of which remain poorly understood. We here tested whether the response to intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) - an effective repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol for increasing cortical excitability - depends on network properties of the cortical motor system. We furthermore investigated whether the responsiveness to iTBS is dose-dependent. To this end, we used a sham-stimulation controlled, single-blinded within-subject design testing for the relationship between iTBS aftereffects and (i) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as well as (ii) resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in 16 healthy subjects. In each session, three blocks of iTBS were applied, separated by 15min. We found that non-responders (subjects not showing an MEP increase of ≥10% after one iTBS block) featured stronger rsFC between the stimulated primary motor cortex (M1) and premotor areas before stimulation compared to responders. However, only the group of responders showed increases in rsFC and MEPs, while most non-responders remained close to baseline levels after all three blocks of iTBS. Importantly, there was still a large amount of variability in both groups. Our data suggest that responsiveness to iTBS at the local level (i.e., M1 excitability) depends upon the pre-interventional network connectivity of the stimulated region. Of note, increasing iTBS dose did not turn non-responders into responders. The finding that higher levels of pre-interventional connectivity precluded a response to iTBS could reflect a ceiling effect underlying non-responsiveness to iTBS at the systems level.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical plasticity; Dose-dependency; SMA; Variability; dPMC

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26052083      PMCID: PMC5216181          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  43 in total

1.  Macaque ventral premotor cortex exerts powerful facilitation of motor cortex outputs to upper limb motoneurons.

Authors:  H Shimazu; M A Maier; G Cerri; P A Kirkwood; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Meta-analytical definition and functional connectivity of the human vestibular cortex.

Authors:  P zu Eulenburg; S Caspers; C Roski; S B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  I-wave origin and modulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; M Dileone; A Oliviero; F Pilato
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Bidirectional effects on interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity induced by excitatory and inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Takamitsu Watanabe; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yuichiro Shirota; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yasuo Terao; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Satoshi Hirose; Yasushi Miyashita; Seiki Konishi; Akira Kunimatsu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Dose-dependence of changes in cortical protein expression induced with repeated transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  Lukas J Volz; Alia Benali; Annika Mix; Ute Neubacher; Klaus Funke
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Mapping interhemispheric connectivity using functional MRI after transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jamila Andoh; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms.

Authors:  Virginia López-Alonso; Binith Cheeran; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Network connectivity and individual responses to brain stimulation in the human motor system.

Authors:  Lizbeth Cárdenas-Morales; Lukas J Volz; Jochen Michely; Anne K Rehme; Eva-Maria Pool; Charlotte Nettekoven; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Resting-state cortico-thalamic-striatal connectivity predicts response to dorsomedial prefrontal rTMS in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Tim V Salomons; Katharine Dunlop; Sidney H Kennedy; Alastair Flint; Joseph Geraci; Peter Giacobbe; Jonathan Downar
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  51 in total

1.  High-dose spaced theta-burst TMS as a rapid-acting antidepressant in highly refractory depression.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Keith D Sudheimer; Brandon S Bentzley; Jaspreet Pannu; Katy H Stimpson; Dalton Duvio; Kirsten Cherian; Jessica Hawkins; Kristen H Scherrer; Benjamin Vyssoki; Danielle DeSouza; Kristin S Raj; Jennifer Keller; Alan F Schatzberg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Paul B Fitzgerald; Kate E Hoy; David Elliot; R N Susan McQueen; Lenore E Wambeek; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Induction and Quantification of Excitability Changes in Human Cortical Networks.

Authors:  Corey J Keller; Yuhao Huang; Jose L Herrero; Maria E Fini; Victor Du; Fred A Lado; Christopher J Honey; Ashesh D Mehta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Microstructural Properties of Human Brain Revealed by Fractional Anisotropy Can Predict the After-Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Ikko Kimura; Hiroki Oishi; Masamichi J Hayashi; Kaoru Amano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  Facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation in older adults: the effect of stimulation type and duration on the induction of motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Rohan Puri; Mark R Hinder; Alison J Canty; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Use of the Temperament and Character Inventory to Predict Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression.

Authors:  Shan H Siddiqi; Ravikumar Chockalingam; C Robert Cloninger; Eric J Lenze; Pilar Cristancho
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.325

7.  An integrated framework for targeting functional networks via transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Michael D Fox; R Cameron Craddock; Stan Colcombe; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Predicting Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Schizophrenia Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Thomas Wobrock; Birgit Guse; Berthold Langguth; Michael Landgrebe; Peter Eichhammer; Elmar Frank; Joachim Cordes; Wolfgang Wölwer; Francesco Musso; Georg Winterer; Wolfgang Gaebel; Göran Hajak; Christian Ohmann; Pablo E Verde; Marcella Rietschel; Raees Ahmed; William G Honer; Dominic Dwyer; Farhad Ghaseminejad; Peter Dechent; Berend Malchow; Peter M Kreuzer; Tim B Poeppl; Thomas Schneider-Axmann; Peter Falkai; Alkomiet Hasan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Gabrielle Block; Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shreya Parchure; Denise Y Harvey; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Laura DeLoretta; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.