Literature DB >> 27450080

Facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation in older adults: the effect of stimulation type and duration on the induction of motor cortex plasticity.

Rohan Puri1, Mark R Hinder2, Alison J Canty3, Jeffery J Summers2,4.   

Abstract

Despite holding significant promise for counteracting the deleterious effects of ageing on cognitive and motor function, little is known of the effects of facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) techniques on corticospinal excitability (CSE) in older adults. Thirty-three older adults (≥60 years) participated in four NBS sessions on separate days, receiving 10- and 20-min anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), and 300 and 600 pulses of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the left M1. Motor-evoked potentials measured in the contralateral hand served as a measure of CSE before and for 30 min following each NBS intervention. At the group level, generalized post-stimulation CSE increases were observed (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the two durations of each stimulation type (atDCS: p = 0.5; iTBS: p = 0.9). For individuals exhibiting overall facilitatory change to atDCS ('responders', n = 10), 20-min atDCS resulted in longer lasting CSE facilitation than 10 min. No such difference was observed between the two iTBS protocols. Considerable variability was observed inter-individually, where 52-58 % of the cohort exhibited the expected facilitation after each of the NBS protocols-as well as intra-individually, where 45-48 % of the cohort maintained consistent post-stimulation responses across the varying durations and types of stimulation. In conclusion, as shown previously in young adults, older adults demonstrate substantial variability in response to different facilitatory NBS protocols. Studies to assess the intra-individual reliability of these protocols are critical to progress towards translation of appropriate protocols (i.e. those that elicit the greatest response for each individual) into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-invasive brain stimulation; Older adults; Plasticity; Theta burst stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450080     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4740-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Unilateral contractions modulate interhemispheric inhibition most strongly and most adaptively in the homologous muscle of the contralateral limb.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Matthew W Schmidt; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta- analysis.

Authors:  Jeffery J Summers; Nyeonju Kang; James H Cauraugh
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.

Authors:  Kerrie-Anne Ho; Janet L Taylor; Taariq Chew; Verònica Gálvez; Angelo Alonzo; Siwei Bai; Socrates Dokos; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Effects of aging on the human motor cortical plasticity studied by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Dina Fathi; Yoshino Ueki; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Takashi Nagamine; Amal Tawfik; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Virginia López-Alonso; Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo; Alessia Costantini; Juan Jose Gonzalez-Henriquez; Binith Cheeran
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  David B Reuben; Susan Magasi; Heather E McCreath; Richard W Bohannon; Ying-Chih Wang; Deborah J Bubela; William Z Rymer; Jennifer Beaumont; Rose Marie Rine; Jin-Shei Lai; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Aron T Hill; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Plasticity Induced by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Bilateral Motor Cortices Is Not Altered in Older Adults.

Authors:  Daina S E Dickins; Martin V Sale; Marc R Kamke
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Effect of 30 Hz theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on the primary motor cortex in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; Paul S Horn; David A Huddleston; Cameron S Laue; Nasrin Shahana; Steve W Wu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors.

Authors:  Alessandra Vergallito; Sarah Feroldi; Alberto Pisoni; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Frontoparietal tDCS Benefits Visual Working Memory in Older Adults With Low Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Hector Arciniega; Filiz Gözenman; Kevin T Jones; Jaclyn A Stephens; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Sham-derived effects and the minimal reliability of theta burst stimulation.

Authors:  P O Boucher; R A Ozdemir; D Momi; M J Burke; A Jannati; P J Fried; A Pascual-Leone; M M Shafi; Emiliano Santarnecchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Differential Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Depending on Previous Musical Training.

Authors:  Ana Sánchez-Kuhn; Cristian Pérez-Fernández; Margarita Moreno; Pilar Flores; Fernando Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.