Literature DB >> 26051888

Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.

Jessica L Alexander1, M Inmaculada Barrasa2, Terry L Orr-Weaver3.   

Abstract

Replication origins are under tight regulation to ensure activation occurs only once per cell cycle [1, 2]. Origin re-firing in a single S phase leads to the generation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and activation of the DNA damage checkpoint [2-7]. If the checkpoint is blocked, cells enter mitosis with partially re-replicated DNA that generates chromosome breaks and fusions [5]. These types of chromosomal aberrations are common in numerous human cancers, suggesting that re-replication events contribute to cancer progression. It was proposed that fork instability and DSBs formed during re-replication are the result of head-to-tail collisions and collapse of adjacent replication forks [3]. However, previously studied systems lack the resolution to determine whether the observed DSBs are generated at sites of fork collisions. Here, we utilize the Drosophila ovarian follicle cells, which exhibit re-replication under precise developmental control [8-10], to model the consequences of re-replication at actively elongating forks. Re-replication occurs from specific replication origins at six genomic loci, termed Drosophila amplicons in follicle cells (DAFCs) [10-12]. Precise developmental timing of DAFC origin firing permits identification of forks at defined points after origin initiation [13, 14]. Here, we show that DAFC re-replication causes fork instability and generates DSBs at sites of potential fork collisions. Immunofluorescence and ChIP-seq demonstrate the DSB marker γH2Av is enriched at elongating forks. Fork progression is reduced in the absence of DNA damage checkpoint components and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), but not homologous recombination. NHEJ appears to continually repair forks during re-replication to maintain elongation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26051888      PMCID: PMC4580973          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  30 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Stephen P Bell; Anindya Dutta
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Gene amplification as a developmental strategy: isolation of two developmental amplicons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Julie M Claycomb; Matt Benasutti; Giovanni Bosco; Douglas D Fenger; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Control of DNA replication and chromosome ploidy by geminin and cyclin A.

Authors:  Ivailo S Mihaylov; Takeshi Kondo; Lynn Jones; Sophia Ryzhikov; Junko Tanaka; Jianyu Zheng; Leigh Ann Higa; Naoto Minamino; Lynn Cooley; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control.

Authors:  Eric Staeva-Vieira; Siuk Yoo; Ruth Lehmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  James P Madigan; Heather L Chotkowski; Robert L Glaser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Rereplication by depletion of geminin is seen regardless of p53 status and activates a G2/M checkpoint.

Authors:  Wenge Zhu; Yuefeng Chen; Anindya Dutta
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies core components of the G₂-M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Shu Kondo; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  Visualization of replication initiation and elongation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Julie M Claycomb; David M MacAlpine; James G Evans; Stephen P Bell; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Loss of Geminin induces rereplication in the presence of functional p53.

Authors:  Marina Melixetian; Andrea Ballabeni; Laura Masiero; Patrizia Gasparini; Raffaella Zamponi; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Kristian Helin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Polyteny: still a giant player in chromosome research.

Authors:  Benjamin M Stormo; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  DNA Repair in Drosophila: Mutagens, Models, and Missing Genes.

Authors:  Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Proliferation of Double-Strand Break-Resistant Polyploid Cells Requires Drosophila FANCD2.

Authors:  Heidi S Bretscher; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  Looping-out mechanism for resolution of replicative stress at telomeres.

Authors:  Tianpeng Zhang; Zepeng Zhang; Feng Li; Qian Hu; Haiying Liu; Mengfan Tang; Wenbin Ma; Junjiu Huang; Zhou Songyang; Yikang Rong; Shichuan Zhang; Benjamin Pc Chen; Yong Zhao
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Multiple mechanisms contribute to double-strand break repair at rereplication forks in Drosophila follicle cells.

Authors:  Jessica L Alexander; Kelly Beagan; Terry L Orr-Weaver; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Histone Variant H3.3 Is Enriched at Drosophila Amplicon Origins but Does Not Mark Them for Activation.

Authors:  Neha P Paranjape; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Chromosomal Replication Complexity: A Novel DNA Metrics and Genome Instability Factor.

Authors:  Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.

Authors:  Jessica L Alexander; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Unraveling the association between genetic integrity and metabolic activity in pre-implantation stage embryos.

Authors:  Fiona D'Souza; Shivanand M Pudakalakatti; Shubhashree Uppangala; Sachin Honguntikar; Sujith Raj Salian; Guruprasad Kalthur; Renu Pasricha; Divya Appajigowda; Hanudatta S Atreya; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  DNA Replication Control During Drosophila Development: Insights into the Onset of S Phase, Replication Initiation, and Fork Progression.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.