Literature DB >> 27849606

Multiple mechanisms contribute to double-strand break repair at rereplication forks in Drosophila follicle cells.

Jessica L Alexander1,2, Kelly Beagan3, Terry L Orr-Weaver4,2, Mitch McVey5.   

Abstract

Rereplication generates double-strand breaks (DSBs) at sites of fork collisions and causes genomic damage, including repeat instability and chromosomal aberrations. However, the primary mechanism used to repair rereplication DSBs varies across different experimental systems. In Drosophila follicle cells, developmentally regulated rereplication is used to amplify six genomic regions, two of which contain genes encoding eggshell proteins. We have exploited this system to test the roles of several DSB repair pathways during rereplication, using fork progression as a readout for DSB repair efficiency. Here we show that a null mutation in the microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) component, polymerase θ/mutagen-sensitive 308 (mus308), exhibits a sporadic thin eggshell phenotype and reduced chorion gene expression. Unlike other thin eggshell mutants, mus308 displays normal origin firing but reduced fork progression at two regions of rereplication. We also find that MMEJ compensates for loss of nonhomologous end joining to repair rereplication DSBs in a site-specific manner. Conversely, we show that fork progression is enhanced in the absence of both Drosophila Rad51 homologs, spindle-A and spindle-B, revealing homologous recombination is active and actually impairs fork movement during follicle cell rereplication. These results demonstrate that several DSB repair pathways are used during rereplication in the follicle cells and their contribution to productive fork progression is influenced by genomic position and repair pathway competition. Furthermore, our findings illustrate that specific rereplication DSB repair pathways can have major effects on cellular physiology, dependent upon genomic context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; NHEJ; break-induced replication; fork collision; oogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27849606      PMCID: PMC5137741          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617110113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Gene amplification as a developmental strategy: isolation of two developmental amplicons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Julie M Claycomb; Matt Benasutti; Giovanni Bosco; Douglas D Fenger; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  After double-strand break induction by UV-A, homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining cooperate at the same DSB if both systems are available.

Authors:  Alexander Rapp; Karl Otto Greulich
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication.

Authors:  A Malkova; E L Ivanov; J E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32.

Authors:  John R Lydeard; Suvi Jain; Miyuki Yamaguchi; James E Haber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Integrative analysis of gene amplification in Drosophila follicle cells: parameters of origin activation and repression.

Authors:  Jane C Kim; Jared Nordman; Fang Xie; Helena Kashevsky; Thomas Eng; Sharon Li; David M MacAlpine; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Jessica L Alexander; M Inmaculada Barrasa; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), double-strand break repair, and cancer.

Authors:  Richard D Wood; Sylvie Doublié
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-14

8.  The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Mehrdad Khajavi; Anne M Connolly; Charles F Towne; Sat Dev Batish; James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Competition between replicative and translesion polymerases during homologous recombination repair in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel P Kane; Michael Shusterman; Yikang Rong; Mitch McVey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nicola Manfrini; Michela Clerici; Maxime Wery; Chiara Vittoria Colombo; Marc Descrimes; Antonin Morillon; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Drosophila melanogaster PIF1 Helicase Promotes Survival During Replication Stress and Processive DNA Synthesis During Double-Strand Gap Repair.

Authors:  Ece Kocak; Sarah Dykstra; Alexandra Nemeth; Catherine G Coughlin; Kasey Rodgers; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid DNA Synthesis During Early Drosophila Embryogenesis Is Sensitive to Maternal Humpty Dumpty Protein Function.

Authors:  Shera Lesly; Jennifer L Bandura; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  DNA polymerase θ (POLQ) is important for repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by fork collapse.

Authors:  Zi Wang; Yadong Song; Shibo Li; Sunil Kurian; Rong Xiang; Takuya Chiba; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Homolog-Dependent Repair Following Dicentric Chromosome Breakage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jayaram Bhandari; Travis Karg; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Cyclically Seasonal Drosophila subobscura Inversion O7 Originated From Fragile Genomic Sites and Relocated Immunity and Metabolic Genes.

Authors:  Charikleia Karageorgiou; Rosa Tarrío; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication.

Authors:  Jessica L Alexander; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  DNA Replication Control During Drosophila Development: Insights into the Onset of S Phase, Replication Initiation, and Fork Progression.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Drosophila DNA polymerase theta utilizes both helicase-like and polymerase domains during microhomology-mediated end joining and interstrand crosslink repair.

Authors:  Kelly Beagan; Robin L Armstrong; Alice Witsell; Upasana Roy; Nikolai Renedo; Amy E Baker; Orlando D Schärer; Mitch McVey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  The DNA polymerases of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steven J Marygold; Helen Attrill; Elena Speretta; Kate Warner; Michele Magrane; Maria Berloco; Sue Cotterill; Mitch McVey; Yikang Rong; Masamitsu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 10.  DNA Damage Responses during the Cell Cycle: Insights from Model Organisms and Beyond.

Authors:  Delisa E Clay; Donald T Fox
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.