Literature DB >> 26049838

Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: Comparison of 5 devices.

Hassan Hashemi1, Abbasali Yekta1, Mehdi Khabazkhoob2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the repeatability of keratometry (K) measurements of a Scheimpflug pachymeter (Pentacam), Placido topographer (Eyesys), scanning-slit corneal topographer (Orbscan), partial coherence interferometry (PCI) device (IOLMaster), and Javal manual keratometer with different grades of keratoconus.
SETTING: Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Keratometry was performed first with Scheimpflug pachymetry followed, in order, by Placido topography, scanning-slit corneal topography, PCI, and manual keratometry. Repeatability was examined in groups with a maximum K of less than 50.0 diopters (D), 50.0 to 55.0 D, and more than 55.0 D.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes of 45 keratoconus patients were assessed. In Group 1, repeatability was highest with Scheimpflug pachymetry and lowest with scanning-slit corneal topography (0.36 to 1.24). In Group 2, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for maximum K ranged from 0.823 with the scanning-slit corneal topography to 0.974 with Scheimpflug pachymetry. The repeatability index for minimum K (0.53 to 2.11) and maximum K (0.60 to 1.92) in this group was highest with Scheimpflug pachymetry and with for scanning-slit corneal topography. In Group 3, the ICCs for minimum K and maximum K ranged from 0.890 to 0.990, and the repeatability index for minimum K varied between 1.66 with Scheimpflug pachymetry to 2.98 with Placido topography; for maximum K, the index was from 2.15 with PCI to 2.81 with the manual keratometer.
CONCLUSIONS: In mild keratoconus, the 5 devices had acceptable repeatability in K readings. In cases with a maximum K reading greater than 55.0 D, all devices had reduced repeatability as a result of measurement errors; thus, measurements might not be so reliable.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049838     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  31 in total

1.  Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Meltem Guzin Altınel; Hasim Uslu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Placido disk-based topography versus high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera for corneal power measurements in keratoconic and post-LASIK eyes: reliability and agreement.

Authors:  Rachele R Penna; Ugo de Sanctis; Martina Catalano; Luca Brusasco; Federico M Grignolo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus.

Authors:  Soheila Asgari; Hassan Hashemi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Alireza Mohamadi; Farhad Rezvan; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Prospective 2-year study of accelerated pulsed transepithelial corneal crosslinking outcomes for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammed Ziaei; Hans Vellara; Akilesh Gokul; Dipika Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuemin Zhang; Saleha Z Munir; Syed A Sami Karim; Wuqaas M Munir
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Identifying more reliable parameters for the detection of change during the follow-up of mild to moderate keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Ivo Guber; Colm McAlinden; François Majo; Ciara Bergin
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-25

7.  Cataract Surgery in Patients with Keratoconus: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  F Aiello; Q J Nasser; C Nucci; R I Angunawela; Z Gatzioufas; V Maurino
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  This issue at a glance.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-21

9.  Higher order optical aberrations and visual acuity in a randomized controlled trial comparing transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Daniel A Godefrooij; Mustapha El Kandoussi; Nienke Soeters; Robert Pl Wisse
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-30

10.  Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug-based and slit-scanning imaging devices.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Aarti Agrawal; Rashmi Deshmukh; Luci Kaweri; Harsha L Rao; Harsha Nagaraja; Chaitra Jayadev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.