Yong Woo Lee1, Chul Young Choi2, Geun Young Yoon1. 1. From Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (Lee, Choi), Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul, South Korea; the University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine (Yoon), Department of Ophthalmology, New York, New York, USA. 2. From Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (Lee, Choi), Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul, South Korea; the University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine (Yoon), Department of Ophthalmology, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: sashimi0@naver.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare measurements of corneal indices using dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido, swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Placido-scanning-slit systems. SETTING: Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic tests. METHODS: Corneal topography measurements were performed using dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido (Galilei G2), swept-source OCT (Casia SS-1000), and Placido-scanning-slit (Orbscan IIz) systems. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measurements. RESULTS: Fifty post-refractive surgery eyes and 50 normal eyes were evaluated. The agreement in anterior keratometry and pachymetry between the 3 devices was high in both groups (ICC > 0.9). In both groups, the ICC values for posterior keratometry and eccentricity were high between the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems (ICC > 0.9) but not between the Placido-scanning-slit system and the other 2 systems. The Placido-scanning-slit system yielded much steeper values for posterior keratometry in both groups (P < .05). The ICC values for posterior corneal elevation were lower than 0.9 between all 3 devices. The dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems showed relatively higher ICC values than the Placido-scanning-slit system in both groups. Maximum posterior elevations were highest with the Placido-scanning-slit system followed by the swept-source OCT system and then the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior keratometry obtained using 3 devices showed high degrees of agreement. Posterior keratometry and eccentricity showed greater agreement between the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems than with the Placido-scanning-slit system. The dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems were equivalent in detecting the shape of the cornea and could be considered interchangeable.
PURPOSE: To compare measurements of corneal indices using dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido, swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Placido-scanning-slit systems. SETTING: Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic tests. METHODS: Corneal topography measurements were performed using dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido (Galilei G2), swept-source OCT (Casia SS-1000), and Placido-scanning-slit (Orbscan IIz) systems. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measurements. RESULTS: Fifty post-refractive surgery eyes and 50 normal eyes were evaluated. The agreement in anterior keratometry and pachymetry between the 3 devices was high in both groups (ICC > 0.9). In both groups, the ICC values for posterior keratometry and eccentricity were high between the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems (ICC > 0.9) but not between the Placido-scanning-slit system and the other 2 systems. The Placido-scanning-slit system yielded much steeper values for posterior keratometry in both groups (P < .05). The ICC values for posterior corneal elevation were lower than 0.9 between all 3 devices. The dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems showed relatively higher ICC values than the Placido-scanning-slit system in both groups. Maximum posterior elevations were highest with the Placido-scanning-slit system followed by the swept-source OCT system and then the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior keratometry obtained using 3 devices showed high degrees of agreement. Posterior keratometry and eccentricity showed greater agreement between the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems than with the Placido-scanning-slit system. The dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido and swept-source OCT systems were equivalent in detecting the shape of the cornea and could be considered interchangeable.
Authors: Seyed Mohammad Ghoreishi; Seyed Ali Akbar Mortazavi; Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi; Mohammad-Ali Abtahi; Seyed Ali Sonbolestan; Seyed-Hossein Abtahi; Mohadeseh Mohammadinia; Kimia Nekouie Isfahani Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Katarzyna Krysik; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Katarzyna Polanowska; Anita Lyssek-Boron; Edward A Wylegala Journal: J Healthc Eng Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 2.682
Authors: Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes Journal: Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol Date: 2019
Authors: Jae Hyuck Lee; Yong Woo Lee; Jong Soo Lee; Michael C Knorz; Gerd U Auffarth; Chul Young Choi Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 1.909