Literature DB >> 26049314

Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.

Jace Wolfe1, Sara Neumann, Megan Marsh, Erin Schafer, Leslie Lianos, Jan Gilden, Lori O'Neill, Pete Arkis, Christine Menapace, Esti Nel, Marian Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implant recipients often experience difficulty understanding speech in noise. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the potential improvement in speech recognition in noise provided by an adaptive, commercially available sound processor that performs acoustic scene classification and automatically adjusts input signal processing to maximize performance in noise. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Within-subjects, repeated-measures design.
SETTING: This multicenter study was conducted across five sites in the U.S.A. and Australia. PATIENTS: Ninety-three adults and children with Nucleus Freedom, CI422, and CI512 cochlear implants. INTERVENTION: Subjects (previous users of the Nucleus 5 sound processor) were fitted with the Nucleus 6 sound processor. Performance was assessed while these subjects used each sound processor in the manufacturer's recommended default program (standard directionality, ASC + ADRO for the Nucleus 5 processor and ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR with SCAN for the Nucleus 6 sound processor). The subjects were also evaluated with the Nucleus 6 with standard directionality, ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR enabled but SCAN disabled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition in noise was assessed with AzBio sentences.
RESULTS: Sentence recognition in noise was significantly better with the Nucleus 6 sound processor when used with the default input processing (ASC + ADRO, SNR-NR, and SCAN) compared to performance with the Nucleus 5 sound processor and default input processing (standard directionality, ASC + ADRO). Specifically, use of the Nucleus 6 at default settings resulted in a mean improvement in sentence recognition in noise of 27 percentage points relative to performance with the Nucleus 5 sound processor. Use of the Nucleus 6 sound processor using standard directionality, ASC + ADRO and SNR-NR (SCAN disabled) resulted in a mean improvement of 9 percentage points in sentence recognition in noise compared to performance with the Nucleus 5.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the Nucleus 6 sound processor with acoustic scene classification, automatic, adaptive directionality, and speech enhancement in noise processing provides significantly better speech recognition in noise when compared to performance with the Nucleus 5 processor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26049314     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Susan M Reynolds; René H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Speech comprehension across multiple CI processor generations: Scene dependent signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Britta Böhnke; Alexander Mewes; Patrick Munder; Stefan J Mauger; Thomas Hocke
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 5.  Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lavin K Entwisle; Sarah E Warren; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Improved performance with automatic sound management 3 in the MED-EL SONNET 2 cochlear implant audio processor.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Kristen Rak; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  The history of Cochlear™ Nucleus® sound processor upgrades: 30 years and counting.

Authors:  Anne L Beiter; Esti Nel
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-10-28

8.  Improved hearing in noise using new signal processing algorithms with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® 6 sound processor.

Authors:  Jan Gilden; Kristen Lewis; Ginger Grant; Jillian Crosson
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.

Authors:  William O Gray; Paul G Mayo; Matthew J Goupell; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.