Literature DB >> 26048869

Involvement of Arabidopsis Hexokinase1 in Cell Death Mediated by Myo-Inositol Accumulation.

Quentin Bruggeman1, Florence Prunier1, Christelle Mazubert1, Linda de Bont1, Marie Garmier1, Raphaël Lugan2, Moussa Benhamed3, Catherine Bergounioux1, Cécile Raynaud1, Marianne Delarue4.   

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) is essential for several aspects of plant life, including development and stress responses. We recently identified the mips1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, which is deficient for the enzyme catalyzing the limiting step of myo-inositol (MI) synthesis. One of the most striking features of mips1 is the light-dependent formation of lesions on leaves due to salicylic acid (SA)-dependent PCD. Here, we identified a suppressor of PCD by screening for mutations that abolish the mips1 cell death phenotype. Our screen identified the hxk1 mutant, mutated in the gene encoding the hexokinase1 (HXK1) enzyme that catalyzes sugar phosphorylation and acts as a genuine glucose sensor. We show that HXK1 is required for lesion formation in mips1 due to alterations in MI content, via SA-dependant signaling. Using two catalytically inactive HXK1 mutants, we also show that hexokinase catalytic activity is necessary for the establishment of lesions in mips1. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses revealed a restoration of the MI content in mips1 hxk1 that it is due to the activity of the MIPS2 isoform, while MIPS3 is not involved. Our work defines a pathway of HXK1-mediated cell death in plants and demonstrates that two MIPS enzymes act cooperatively under a particular metabolic status, highlighting a novel checkpoint of MI homeostasis in plants.
© 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26048869      PMCID: PMC4498202          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.00068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  53 in total

1.  Technical advance: simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  U Roessner; C Wagner; J Kopka; R N Trethewey; L Willmitzer
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 2.  Functional genomics of inositol metabolism.

Authors:  Javad Torabinejad; Glenda E Gillaspy
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms.

Authors:  Filip Rolland; Elena Baena-Gonzalez; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  Salicylic acid-independent induction of pathogenesis-related protein transcripts by sugars is dependent on leaf developmental stage.

Authors:  K Herbers; P Meuwly; J P Métraux; U Sonnewald
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-11-18       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  1 L-myo-Inositol 1-Phosphate Synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  M. D. Johnson; I. M. Sussex
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Substantial roles of hexokinase and fructokinase in the effects of sugars on plant physiology and development.

Authors:  David Granot; Gilor Kelly; Ofer Stein; Rakefet David-Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  José M Alonso; Anna N Stepanova; Thomas J Leisse; Christopher J Kim; Huaming Chen; Paul Shinn; Denise K Stevenson; Justin Zimmerman; Pascual Barajas; Rosa Cheuk; Carmelita Gadrinab; Collen Heller; Albert Jeske; Eric Koesema; Cristina C Meyers; Holly Parker; Lance Prednis; Yasser Ansari; Nathan Choy; Hashim Deen; Michael Geralt; Nisha Hazari; Emily Hom; Meagan Karnes; Celene Mulholland; Ral Ndubaku; Ian Schmidt; Plinio Guzman; Laura Aguilar-Henonin; Markus Schmid; Detlef Weigel; David E Carter; Trudy Marchand; Eddy Risseeuw; Debra Brogden; Albana Zeko; William L Crosby; Charles C Berry; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Takayuki Kurose; Takeshi Hino; Katsunori Tanaka; Makoto Kawamukai; Yasuo Niwa; Kiminori Toyooka; Ken Matsuoka; Tetsuro Jinbo; Tetsuya Kimura
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  VTC4 is a bifunctional enzyme that affects myoinositol and ascorbate biosynthesis in plants.

Authors:  Javad Torabinejad; Janet L Donahue; Bhadra N Gunesekera; Matthew J Allen-Daniels; Glenda E Gillaspy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  An inositolphosphorylceramide synthase is involved in regulation of plant programmed cell death associated with defense in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Wenming Wang; Xiaohua Yang; Samantha Tangchaiburana; Roland Ndeh; Jonathan E Markham; Yoseph Tsegaye; Teresa M Dunn; Guo-Liang Wang; Maria Bellizzi; James F Parsons; Danielle Morrissey; Janis E Bravo; Daniel V Lynch; Shunyuan Xiao
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  23 in total

1.  Chloroplast Activity and 3'phosphadenosine 5'phosphate Signaling Regulate Programmed Cell Death in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Quentin Bruggeman; Christelle Mazubert; Florence Prunier; Raphaël Lugan; Kai Xun Chan; Su Yin Phua; Barry James Pogson; Anja Krieger-Liszkay; Marianne Delarue; Moussa Benhamed; Catherine Bergounioux; Cécile Raynaud
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Genomic Prediction Elucidate the Genetic Architecture of Morphological Traits in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Rik Kooke; Willem Kruijer; Ralph Bours; Frank Becker; André Kuhn; Henri van de Geest; Jaap Buntjer; Timo Doeswijk; José Guerra; Harro Bouwmeester; Dick Vreugdenhil; Joost J B Keurentjes
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  MdUGT88F1-Mediated Phloridzin Biosynthesis Regulates Apple Development and Valsa Canker Resistance.

Authors:  Kun Zhou; Lingyu Hu; Yangtiansu Li; Xiaofeng Chen; Zhijun Zhang; Bingbing Liu; Pengmin Li; Xiaoqing Gong; Fengwang Ma
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  WRKY18 and WRKY53 Coordinate with HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE1 to Regulate Rapid Responses to Sugar.

Authors:  Qingshuai Chen; Xiyu Xu; Di Xu; Haisen Zhang; Cankui Zhang; Gang Li
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Convergence of mitochondrial and chloroplastic ANAC017/PAP-dependent retrograde signalling pathways and suppression of programmed cell death.

Authors:  Olivier Van Aken; Barry J Pogson
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 15.828

6.  Sugar signaling regulation by arabidopsis SIZ1-driven sumoylation is independent of salicylic acid.

Authors:  Pedro Humberto Castro; Nuno Verde; Rui Manuel Tavares; Eduardo Rodríguez Bejarano; Herlânder Azevedo
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 7.  Dynamic and diverse sugar signaling.

Authors:  Lei Li; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 7.834

8.  Unraveling Aspects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Mediated Enhanced Production of Rice under Biotic Stress of Rhizoctonia solani.

Authors:  Suchi Srivastava; Vidisha Bist; Sonal Srivastava; Poonam C Singh; Prabodh K Trivedi; Mehar H Asif; Puneet S Chauhan; Chandra S Nautiyal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Co-suppression of AtMIPS demonstrates cooperation of MIPS1, MIPS2 and MIPS3 in maintaining myo-inositol synthesis.

Authors:  C M Fleet; J Y Yen; E A Hill; G E Gillaspy
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 10.  Dynamic Nutrient Signaling Networks in Plants.

Authors:  Lei Li; Kun-Hsiang Liu; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 11.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.