BACKGROUND: The Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) program is a hospital-based initiative shown to decrease hospital reutilization. We implemented the RED in 10 hospitals to study the implementation process. DESIGN: We recruited 10 hospitals from different regions of the United States to implement the RED and provided training for participating hospital leaders and implementation staff using the RED Toolkit as the basis of the curriculum followed by monthly telephone-based technical assistance for up to 1 year. METHODS: Two team members interviewed key informants from each hospital before RED implementation and then 1 year later. Interview data were analyzed according to common and comparative themes identified across institutions. Readmission outcomes were collected on participating hospitals and compared pre- versus post-RED implementation. RESULTS: Key findings included (1) wide variability in the fidelity of the RED intervention; (2) engaged leadership and multidisciplinary implementation teams were keys to success; (3) common challenges included obtaining timely follow-up appointments, transmitting discharge summaries to outpatient clinicians, and leveraging information technology. Eight out of 10 hospitals reported improvement in 30-day readmission rates after RED implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A supportive hospital culture is essential for successful RED implementation. A flexible implementation strategy can be used to implement RED and reduce readmissions.
BACKGROUND: The Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) program is a hospital-based initiative shown to decrease hospital reutilization. We implemented the RED in 10 hospitals to study the implementation process. DESIGN: We recruited 10 hospitals from different regions of the United States to implement the RED and provided training for participating hospital leaders and implementation staff using the RED Toolkit as the basis of the curriculum followed by monthly telephone-based technical assistance for up to 1 year. METHODS: Two team members interviewed key informants from each hospital before RED implementation and then 1 year later. Interview data were analyzed according to common and comparative themes identified across institutions. Readmission outcomes were collected on participating hospitals and compared pre- versus post-RED implementation. RESULTS: Key findings included (1) wide variability in the fidelity of the RED intervention; (2) engaged leadership and multidisciplinary implementation teams were keys to success; (3) common challenges included obtaining timely follow-up appointments, transmitting discharge summaries to outpatient clinicians, and leveraging information technology. Eight out of 10 hospitals reported improvement in 30-day readmission rates after RED implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A supportive hospital culture is essential for successful RED implementation. A flexible implementation strategy can be used to implement RED and reduce readmissions.
Authors: Carol VanDeusen Lukas; Ryann L Engle; Sally K Holmes; Victoria A Parker; Robert A Petzel; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Michael Shwartz; Jennifer L Sullivan Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2010 Jul-Sep
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Christianne L Roumie; Anuj K Dalal; Courtney Cawthon; Alexandra Businger; Svetlana K Eden; Ayumi Shintani; Kelly Cunningham Sponsler; L Jeff Harris; Cecelia Theobald; Robert L Huang; Danielle Scheurer; Susan Hunt; Terry A Jacobson; Kimberly J Rask; Viola Vaccarino; Tejal K Gandhi; David W Bates; Mark V Williams; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian W Jack; Veerappa K Chetty; David Anthony; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Gail M Sanchez; Anna E Johnson; Shaula R Forsythe; Julie K O'Donnell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Christopher Manasseh; Stephen Martin; Larry Culpepper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carol VanDeusen Lukas; Sally K Holmes; Alan B Cohen; Joseph Restuccia; Irene E Cramer; Michael Shwartz; Martin P Charns Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2007 Oct-Dec
Authors: Mark V Pauly; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra L Hanlon; Liming Huang; Kathryn H Bowles; Christine Bradway; Kathleen McCauley; Mary D Naylor Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Michael P Klueh; Kenneth R Sloss; Lesly A Dossett; Michael J Englesbe; Jennifer F Waljee; Chad M Brummett; Pooja A Lagisetty; Jay S Lee Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Benedict Morath; Anette Lampert; Franziska Elisabeth Glaß; Michael Metzner; Discharge Study Team; Walter Emil Haefeli; Hanna M Seidling Journal: Eur J Hosp Pharm Date: 2019-12-20
Authors: Kristin Levoy; Eleanor Rivera; Molly McHugh; Alexandra Hanlon; Karen B Hirschman; Mary D Naylor Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Linda C Gallo; Addie L Fortmann; Julia I Bravin; Taylor L Clark; Kimberly L Savin; Duvia Lara Ledesma; Johanna Euyoque; Haley Sandoval; Scott C Roesch; Todd Gilmer; Gregory A Talavera; Athena Philis-Tsimikas Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jing Li; Gaixin Du; Jessica Miller Clouser; Arnold Stromberg; Glen Mays; Joann Sorra; Jane Brock; Terry Davis; Suzanne Mitchell; Huong Q Nguyen; Mark V Williams Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ryann L Engle; David C Mohr; Sally K Holmes; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Melissa Afable; Jenniffer Leyson; Mark Meterko Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2019-06-20
Authors: Suzanne E Mitchell; Vivian Laurens; Gabriela M Weigel; Karen B Hirschman; Allison M Scott; Huong Q Nguyen; Jessica Martin Howard; Lance Laird; Carol Levine; Terry C Davis; Brianna Gass; Elizabeth Shaid; Jing Li; Mark V Williams; Brian W Jack Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 5.166