Literature DB >> 34930792

Changing the medication documentation process for discharge: impact on clinical routine and documentation quality-a process analysis.

Benedict Morath1,2, Anette Lampert1,2, Franziska Elisabeth Glaß1, Michael Metzner1, Discharge Study Team3, Walter Emil Haefeli1,2, Hanna M Seidling4,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2017, an in-house best-practice process for medication documentation was developed and implemented to meet the new German legal requirements concerning the management of patient discharge from the hospital. Because this law regulates the common steps of good discharge practices (eg, specification of discharge mediation documentation), we used its implementation to assess the impact of such a measure on the quality of medication documentation and related workflows in clinical routine.
METHODS: By observing workflows and interviewing the affected employees, we analysed the medication workflow processes from admission to discharge of seven representative departments of a large university hospital before and early after implementation of a newly defined best-practice process. To investigate the implementation impact, following measures were determined overall and for five key process steps: quality of medication documentation as measured by predefined criteria, the adherence to the best-practice process (range 0%-100%), workload and potential shifts in responsibilities.
RESULTS: Already early after implementation, all departments met the legal requirements and the quality of the medication documentation increased from low to high quality in most departments. Mean adherence to the best-practice process was 77% (range 60%-100%) with strictest adherence of 100% in one department. Thereby, the number of process steps and hence, likely also the workload increased in all departments. New tasks were mainly performed by physicians and in one department by pharmacists.
CONCLUSIONS: The new lawful best-practice process led to a higher quality in medication documentation at the cost of a higher workload for physicians, potentially limiting time for other care tasks. Therefore, it could be important to define areas of the medication documentation process in which physicians could be supported by other professions or new tools facilitating accurate medication documentation as the basis of continuity of care. © European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discharge management; electronic prescribing; implementation research; medication documentation; process evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 34930792      PMCID: PMC8717803          DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 2047-9956


  26 in total

1.  Emergency re-admissions to hospital due to adverse drug reactions within 1 year of the index admission.

Authors:  Emma C Davies; Christopher F Green; David R Mottram; Philip H Rowe; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Authors:  Stephen F Jencks; Mark V Williams; Eric A Coleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  How Hospitals Reengineer Their Discharge Processes to Reduce Readmissions.

Authors:  Suzanne E Mitchell; Jessica Martin; Sally Holmes; Carol van Deusen Lukas; Ramon Cancino; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Cindy Brach; Brian Jack
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

4.  Preventability and Causes of Readmissions in a National Cohort of General Medicine Patients.

Authors:  Andrew D Auerbach; Sunil Kripalani; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Neil Sehgal; Peter K Lindenauer; Joshua P Metlay; Grant Fletcher; Gregory W Ruhnke; Scott A Flanders; Christopher Kim; Mark V Williams; Larissa Thomas; Vernon Giang; Shoshana J Herzig; Kanan Patel; W John Boscardin; Edmondo J Robinson; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Schnipper; Jennifer L Kirwin; Michael C Cotugno; Stephanie A Wahlstrom; Brandon A Brown; Emily Tarvin; Allen Kachalia; Mark Horng; Christopher L Roy; Sylvia C McKean; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-13

6.  The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Harvey J Murff; Josh F Peterson; Tejal K Gandhi; David W Bates
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  A comprehensive pharmacist intervention to reduce morbidity in patients 80 years or older: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ulrika Gillespie; Anna Alassaad; Dan Henrohn; Hans Garmo; Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes; Henrik Toss; Asa Kettis-Lindblad; Håkan Melhus; Claes Mörlin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-11

Review 8.  Discharge planning from hospital.

Authors:  Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Natasha A Lannin; Lindy M Clemson; Ian D Cameron; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-27

9.  The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support.

Authors:  Stijn Van de Velde; Ilkka Kunnamo; Pavel Roshanov; Tiina Kortteisto; Bert Aertgeerts; Per Olav Vandvik; Signe Flottorp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.

Authors:  Liesbeth Geerligs; Nicole M Rankin; Heather L Shepherd; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.