Kristin Levoy1,2,3, Eleanor Rivera4, Molly McHugh5, Alexandra Hanlon6, Karen B Hirschman5, Mary D Naylor5. 1. Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University (IU) School of Nursing. 2. IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute. 3. IU Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN. 4. University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Department of Statistics, Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, College of Science, Roanoke, VA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluctuations in health among chronically ill adults result in frequent health care transitions. Some interventions to improve patient outcomes after hospitalization include caregiver engagement as a core component, yet there is unclear evidence of the effects of this component on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence regarding the attention given to caregiver engagement in randomized control trials of transitional care interventions (TCIs), estimate the overall intervention effects, and assess caregiver engagement as a moderator of intervention effects. METHODS: Three databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials of TCIs targeting adults living with physical or emotional chronic diseases. For the meta-analysis, overall effects were computed using the relative risk (RR) effect size and inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies met criteria, representing 31,291 participants and 66 rehospitalizations effect sizes. Half (51%) the interventions lacked focus on caregiver engagement. The overall effect of TCIs on all-cause rehospitalizations was nonsignificant at 1 month (P=0.107, k=29), but significant at ≥2 months [RR=0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.97; P=0.007, k=27]. Caregiver engagement moderated intervention effects (P=0.05), where interventions with caregiver engagement reduced rehospitalizations (RR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.92; P=0.001), and those without, did not (RR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.08; P=0.550). Interventions with and without caregiver engagement did not differ in the average number of components utilized, however, interventions with caregiver engagement more commonly employed baseline needs assessments (P=0.032), discharge planning (P=0.006), and service coordination (P=0.035). DISCUSSION: Future TCIs must consistently incorporate the active participation of caregivers in design, delivery, and evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Fluctuations in health among chronically ill adults result in frequent health care transitions. Some interventions to improve patient outcomes after hospitalization include caregiver engagement as a core component, yet there is unclear evidence of the effects of this component on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence regarding the attention given to caregiver engagement in randomized control trials of transitional care interventions (TCIs), estimate the overall intervention effects, and assess caregiver engagement as a moderator of intervention effects. METHODS: Three databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials of TCIs targeting adults living with physical or emotional chronic diseases. For the meta-analysis, overall effects were computed using the relative risk (RR) effect size and inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies met criteria, representing 31,291 participants and 66 rehospitalizations effect sizes. Half (51%) the interventions lacked focus on caregiver engagement. The overall effect of TCIs on all-cause rehospitalizations was nonsignificant at 1 month (P=0.107, k=29), but significant at ≥2 months [RR=0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.97; P=0.007, k=27]. Caregiver engagement moderated intervention effects (P=0.05), where interventions with caregiver engagement reduced rehospitalizations (RR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.92; P=0.001), and those without, did not (RR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.08; P=0.550). Interventions with and without caregiver engagement did not differ in the average number of components utilized, however, interventions with caregiver engagement more commonly employed baseline needs assessments (P=0.032), discharge planning (P=0.006), and service coordination (P=0.035). DISCUSSION: Future TCIs must consistently incorporate the active participation of caregivers in design, delivery, and evaluation.
Authors: David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Cynthia Feltner; Christine D Jones; Crystal W Cené; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Carla A Sueta; Emmanuel J L Coker-Schwimmer; Marina Arvanitis; Kathleen N Lohr; Jennifer C Middleton; Daniel E Jonas Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Richard B Balaban; Fang Zhang; Catherine E Vialle-Valentin; Alison A Galbraith; Marguerite E Burns; Marc R Larochelle; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian Chan; L Elizabeth Goldman; Urmimala Sarkar; Michelle Schneidermann; Eric Kessell; David Guzman; Jeff Critchfield; Margot Kushel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard B Balaban; Alison A Galbraith; Marguerite E Burns; Catherine E Vialle-Valentin; Marc R Larochelle; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Giana H Davidson; Elizabeth Austin; Lucas Thornblade; Louise Simpson; Thuan D Ong; Hanh Pan; David R Flum Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Susan J Altfeld; Gayle E Shier; Madeleine Rooney; Tricia J Johnson; Robyn L Golden; Kelly Karavolos; Elizabeth Avery; Vijay Nandi; Anthony J Perry Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2012-09-07
Authors: Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Carol J Peden; John Soong; Per Arne Holman; Maria Bogdanovskaya; Lorna Barclay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240