| Literature DB >> 26042092 |
Abstract
This study explores the role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) as an additional carbon source for heterotrophic microbial activity in the eutrophic Qishon estuary. From the coastal station and upstream the estuary; TEP concentrations, β-glucosidase activity, bacterial production and abundance have gradually increased. TEP were often found as bio-aggregates, scaffolding algae, detritus matter and bacteria that likely formed "hotspots" for enhance microbial activity. To further demonstrate the link between TEP and heterotrophic bacterial activity, confined incubations with ambient and polysaccharide-enriched estuary water were carried out. Following polysaccharide addition, elevated (~50%) β-glucosidase activity rates were observed, leading to TEP hydrolysis. This newly formed bioavailable carbon resulted in significantly higher growth rates, with up to a 5-fold increase in heterotrophic bacterial biomass, comprising mostly high nucleic acid content bacteria. Taking together the findings from this research, we conclude that even in highly eutrophic environments heterotrophic bacteria may still be carbon limited. Further, TEP as a polysaccharide matrix can act as a metabolic surrogate, adding fresh bioavailable carbon through tight associations with bacteria in eutrophic ecosystems such as the Qishon estuary.Entities:
Keywords: BCD; BGE; TEP; ectoenzyme; estuary; heterotrophic bacteria; polysaccharides; β-glucosidase
Year: 2015 PMID: 26042092 PMCID: PMC4436900 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Map of the station locations: E1–E3 are situated along the Qishon estuary and station Sh is located off the Israeli coast.
The physicochemical characteristics of the coastal (Sh) and Qishon estuary (E1–E3) stations during summer months of 2013 (Sep.) and 2014(Jun., Jul. and Aug.).
| Latitude | N | 32°49′34 | 32°48′16 | 32°48′05 | 32°48′06 | |||
| Longitude | E | 34°57′20 | 35°01′51 | 35°02′19 | 35°02′43 | |||
| Sampling depth | m | 0.1–0.2 | 0.1–0.2 | 2–3 | 0.1–0.2 | 2 | 0.1–0.2 | 3–4 |
| Temperature | °C | 27 ± 2.6 | 27 ± 1.6 | 26 ± 2.8 | 28 ± 1.1 | 27 ± 2.3 | 27 ± 2.1 | 27 ± 2.6 |
| Salinity | 39 ± 0.4 | 29 ± 4.3 | 39 ± 0.3 | 20 ± 4.8 | 39 ± 0.4 | 18 ± 3.2 | 36 ± 0.4 | |
| pH | 8.2 | 8.1 ± 0.1 | 8.2 | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 8.1 ± 0.1 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.1 | |
| DO | mg L−1 | 8.3 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 2.1 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| Turbidity | NTU | 1.5 ± 1.7 | 5.6 ± 1.5 | 22 ± 9.4 | 12 ± 3.6 | 41 ± 6.1 | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 23 ± 3.7 |
| NO2+NO | μM | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 487 | 65 ± 62 | 313 ± 159 | 132 ± 123 | 954 | 255 ± 108 |
| NH | μM | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 28.0 | 6.7 ± 6.3 | 74 ± 32 | 18 ± 18 | 304 | 55 ± 43 |
| PO | μM | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 3.5 | 3.7 ± 2.7 | 12.6 ± 2.5 | 5.5 ± 2.2 | 5.6 | 11.9 ± 2.3 |
Values are the averages and their standard deviation represents four sampling dates.
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus were referred as DIN and DIP in the text respectively.
Figure 2Physicochemical depth profiles of the Qishon estuary stations downstream toward the coastal reference station; E3 (Histadrut)—(A–D), E1 (Maagan)—(E–H), E2 (Yulius)—(I–L), and Sh- (M–P). Measurements were taken between June and September.
Figure 3Parameters sampled from the surface and bottom layers, along the eutrophic gradient; from Qishon estuary system (E3 to E1) to the coastal reference station (Sh). Water samples were analyzed for; Chlorophyll a as phytoplankton proxy (A), TEP concentrations (B), Microscopic visualization of a representative bio-aggregate (C), heterotrophic bacterial abundance (D), bacterial production (E), and β-glucosidase activity (F). Bars represent the average of three independent sampling dates with corresponding standard deviation. To visualize bio-aggregates water were sampled from a representative station (E1). Bacterial clusters were stained with SYTO 9 (bright green) and captured with epifluorescent microscopy. Bright field microscopy was used to visualize transparent exopolymers particles (TEP) stained with alcian blue (as light blue), and algal cells (as dark green). Images were superimposed using Image J software (). Chlorophyll a pigment was not detected by autoflorescence within the bacterial clusters.
Figure 4Differences between the control and GX-enriched microcosm experiments comparing: changes in heterotrophic bacterial biomass (ΔHBB = T. Each box plot represents microcosms that were incubated with water samples from the surface and bottom of stations E1–E3. Box plot boundary are the 25th–75th percentile while the inner line represent median and whiskers highlight the 10th–90th percentile. Significant differences between control and GX enriched microcosms are marked with an asterisk (P < 0.01).
Biological properties measured in un-amended controls and gum-xanthan (GX) enriched microcosms incubated 2 days (T.
| Chl. | μg L−1 | 2.1±0.6 | 0.3±0.2 | 2.1±0.6 | 0.3±0.3 |
| HBB | μg C L−1 | 47±22 | 60±29 | 47±22 | 86±44 |
| HNA | x108 Cell L−1 | 15±7.1 | 20±10 | 15±7.1 | 31±14 |
| LNA | x108 Cell L−1 | 8.3±4.6 | 10±4.2 | 8.3±4.6 | 11±6.3 |
| HNA/LNA | Cell/Cell | 2±0.7 | 1.9±0.6 | 2±0.7 | 3.3±1.3 |
| TEP | μg C L−1 | 160±48 | 384±206 | 1312±52 | 849±351 |
| β-glu | μg C L−1 d−1 | 34±7.5 | 32±9 | 34±7.5 | 46±9 |
| BP | μg C L−1 d−1 | 109±21 | 165±34 | 109±21 | 121±24 |
| BCD | μg C L−1 d−1 | NA | 359±167 | NA | 557±276 |
| BGE | % | NA | 42±22 | NA | 37±20 |
| Growth rate | d−1 | NA | 0.15±0.1 | NA | 0.28±0.09 |
All values are the averages and their standard deviation of nine bottle incubations.
Bacterial abundance was converted into biomass (HBB) by a factor of 20 fg C per cell (Lee and Fuhrman, .
TEP was converted from GX into carbon biomass using a 0.74 factor (Engel and Passow, .
β-glucosidase activity (β-glu) was converted from MUF to carbon biomass using 72 μg C to 1 μM MUF factor (Hoppe, .
Bacterial production was converted into carbon biomass using a conversion factor of 3.1 kg C mol.
Growth rates calculated according to Equation (1).
Figure 5Changes in heterotrophic bacterial community composition following GX addition (GX) compared to un-amended controls (C) during the experimental microcosm 2 days incubations (T. The bacterial community was segregated into two subgroups containing high and low nucleic acid content (HNA and LNA, respectively). Each box plot represents microcosms that were carried with water samples from the surface and bottom of stations E1–E3. Differences between HNA and LNA were evaluated using One-Way ANOVA followed by Fisher LSD multiple comparison post-hoc test with a confidence of 95%.
Figure 6Relationship between changes in TEP concentrations (ΔTEP = T. Data was collected from both the control (white circles) and GX enriched (gray circles) bottle incubations. Linear regression is shown of: ΔTEP vs. ΔHBB for the control (R2 = 0.54, P = 0.014, n = 9) and enriched (R2 = 0.40, P = 0.09, n = 9) microcosms.