| Literature DB >> 26039055 |
Margit Mutso1, Andrei Nikonov1, Arno Pihlak2, Eva Žusinaite1, Liane Viru1, Anastasia Selyutina3, Tõnu Reintamm4, Merike Kelve4, Mart Saarma5, Mati Karelson6, Andres Merits3.
Abstract
The inhibitory potency of an antisense oligonucleotide depends critically on its design and the accessibility of its target site. Here, we used an RNA interference-guided approach to select antisense oligonucleotide target sites in the coding region of the highly structured hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA genome. We modified the conventional design of an antisense oligonucleotide containing locked nucleic acid (LNA) residues at its termini (LNA/DNA gapmer) by inserting 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) residues into the central DNA region. Obtained compounds, designed with the aim to analyze the effects of 8-oxo-dG modifications on the antisense oligonucleotides, displayed a unique set of properties. Compared to conventional LNA/DNA gapmers, the melting temperatures of the duplexes formed by modified LNA/DNA gapmers and DNA or RNA targets were reduced by approximately 1.6-3.3°C per modification. Comparative transfection studies showed that small interfering RNA was the most potent HCV RNA replication inhibitor (effective concentration 50 (EC50): 0.13 nM), whereas isosequential standard and modified LNA/DNA gapmers were approximately 50-fold less efficient (EC50: 5.5 and 7.1 nM, respectively). However, the presence of 8-oxo-dG residues led to a more complete suppression of HCV replication in transfected cells. These modifications did not affect the efficiency of RNase H cleavage of antisense oligonucleotide:RNA duplexes but did alter specificity, triggering the appearance of multiple cleavage products. Moreover, the incorporation of 8-oxo-dG residues increased the stability of antisense oligonucleotides of different configurations in human serum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26039055 PMCID: PMC4454572 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Incorporation of 8-oxo-dG, but not 5-OH-dC, reduces the Tm of ASO:DNA and ASO:RNA duplexes.
(A) Structures of 8-oxo-dG, its zwitterionic (minor) form and 5-OH-dC (common and minor forms). (B, C) The effects of modified nucleobases on the Tm of ASO:DNA (B) and ASO:RNA (C) duplexes as measured by FRET. Target DNA or RNA oligonucleotides (Table 2) were labeled with Cy3 at the 3’-end, and modified oligonucleotide probes and controls were labeled with FITC at the 5’-end. Probe:target hybridization was quantified by measuring the decrease in FITC fluorescence due to the energy transfer to the Cy3 fluorochrome attached to the hybridized target. Increasing target concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 nM) were used (x-axis), whereas the probe concentration remained constant at 50 nM in all experiments. The experimentally measured Tm is presented on the y-axis. Y (X) and YY (XX) probes contained one or two 8-oxo-dG (5-OH-dC) modifications, respectively. C, unmodified control probe. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments.
Sequences of DNA and LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides.
| Compound | Sequence (5’->3’) and modifications |
|---|---|
| D4676 | NH2-ATC ACT GAG TCG AAA TCG CCG |
| D4676inv | NH2-GCC GCT AAA GCT GAG TCA CTA |
| LD4676 | NH2-+A+T+C +A+CT GAG TCG AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
| LD4676inv | NH2-+G+C+C +G+CT AAA GCT GAG T+C+A +C+T+A |
| DM4676 | NH2-ATC ACT YAY TCY AAA TCG CCG |
| LDM3570 | NH2-+A+T+G +A+TA GAX AGT XXA A+C+A +C+A+C |
| LDM3570inv | NH2-+C+A+C +A+CA AXX TGA XAG AT+A +G+T+A |
| LDM4676 | NH2-+A+T+C +A+CT YAY TCY AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
| LDM4676inv | NH2-+G+C+C +G+CT AAA YCT YAY T+C+A +C+T+A |
| MixLD4676 | NH2-+AT+C AC+T GAG +TCG +AAA +TC+G C+C+G |
NH2 = 5’ amino modifier C6. This group was present only in the oligonucleotides used for melting curve determination and for the analysis of delivery into cells. + = prefix for LNA; X = 5-OH-dC; Y = 8-oxo-dG.
Fig 2RNAi-guided oligonucleotide target-site selection in the coding region of HCV RNA.
(A) Schematic of the HCV genome and the luc/neo-ET (I389/NS3-3’/LucUbiNeo-ET) replicon. The numbers above the HCV genomic RNA indicate the positions of the start codons for the non-structural proteins NS3-NS5B. Luc/neo, firefly luciferase/neomycin phosphotransferase cassette; E-I, encephalomyocarditis virus IRES element. (B) Inhibitory effects of thirty-two different siRNAs targeting the NS3-NS5B region of the luc/neo-ET replicon. The siRNAs (Table 3, guide strands are indicated on the x-axis; “+”, combination of control siRNAs targeting the Luc reporter gene) were transfected into Huh-luc/neo-ET cells at a concentration of 100 nM. At 48 h p.t., the total protein content and Luc activities in cell lysates were determined. The Luc activities were first normalized to total protein content; next, the obtained values were normalized to the value obtained for control cells transfected with non-targeting negative control siRNA (designated as “-”), which was set to 1. The y-axis indicates the fold inhibition of HCV replication achieved using the corresponding siRNAs (note the logarithmic scale). The error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments.
Sequences of oligonucleotides used to determine the melting temperatures by FRET.
| Compound | Sequence (5’->3’) and modifications |
|---|---|
| Target RNA-Cy3 | GAU UCU GAU GAC UCA UUU CUU-Cy3 |
| Target DNA-Cy3 | GAT TCT GAT GAC TCA TTT CTT-Cy3 |
| FITC-C | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTC ATC AGA ATC |
| FITC-X | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTX ATC AGA ATC |
| FITC-XX | FITC-AAG AAA TGA GTX ATX AGA ATC |
| FITC-Y | FITC-AAG AAA TYA GTC ATC AGA ATC |
| FITC-YY | FITC-AAG AAA TYA YTC ATC AGA ATC |
| Target RNA-TYE563 | CGG CGA UUU CGA CUC AGU GAU-TYE563 |
| Target DNA-TYE563 | CGG CGA TTT CGA CTC AGT GAT-TYE563 |
| FAM-D4676 | FAM-ATC ACT GAG TCG AAA TCG CCG |
| FAM-LD4676 | FAM-+A+T+C +A+CT GAG TCG AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
| FAM-LDM4676 | FAM-+A+T+C +A+CT YAY TCY AAA T+C+G +C+C+G |
NH2 = 5’ amino modifier C6; + = prefix for LNA; X = 5-OH-dC; Y = 8-oxo-dG.
Sequences of oligonucleotides in siRNA duplexes.
| Position | Antisense strand (5'->3') | Sense siRNA strand (5'->3') |
|---|---|---|
| 3457 | UAG UGA UGA UGC AGC CAA GUA | C UUG GCU GCA UCA UCA CUA GC |
| 3564 | GAC AGU CCA ACA CAC GCC AUU | U GGC GUG UGU UGG ACU GUC UA |
| 3570 | AUG AUA GAC AGU CCA ACA CAC | G UGU UGG ACU GUC UAU CAU GG |
| 4167 | UAC CCC GGU UCU GAU GUU AGG | U AAC AUC AGA ACC GGG GUA AG |
| 4676 | AUC ACU GAG UCG AAA UCG CCG | G CGA UUU CGA CUC AGU GAU CG |
| 4814 | AUG CCC AUC CUG CCC CUA CCA | G UAG GGG CAG GAU GGG CAU UU |
| 5066 | UUG UCU CCU GCC UGC UUA GUC | C UAA GCA GGC AGG AGA CAA CU |
| 5378 | AUC CUG CCC ACA AUG ACC ACG | U GGU CAU UGU GGG CAG GAU CA |
| 5518 | UUG CCU UCU GUU UGA AUU GUU | C AAU UCA AAC AGA AGG CAA UC |
| 5622 | AUU CCA CAU AUG CUU CGC CCA | G GCG AAG CAU AUG UGG AAU UU |
| 5939 | AUC UCG CCG CUC AUG ACC UUA | A GGU CAU GAG CGG CGA GAU GC |
| 5978 | AUA GCA GGG AGU AGG UUA ACC | U UAA CCU ACU CCC UGC UAU CC |
| 6274 | AUA UCC AAU CCC AAA CAU CUC | G AUG UUU GGG AUU GGA UAU GC |
| 6365 | UAC CCA CGU UGA CAU GAG AAG | U CUC AUG UCA ACG UGG GUA CA |
| 6590 | UAC UCC UCA GCA GCC ACC CGC | G GGU GGC UGC UGA GGA GUA CG |
| 7043 | AUG UUC CCG CCC AUC UCC UGC | A GGA GAU GGG CGG GAA CAU CA |
| 7125 | UAC UUC CCU CUC AUC CUC CUC | G GAG GAU GAG AGG GAA GUA UC |
| 7512 | AUC CCC CGG CUC CCC CUC AAG | U GAG GGG GAG CCG GGG GAU CC |
| 7699 | UUG UAG CAU AGA CCA AGU UGU | A ACU UGG UCU AUG CUA CAA CA |
| 7749 | CAG UCU GUC AAA GGU GAC CUU | G GUC ACC UUU GAC AGA CUG CA |
| 7790 | AUC UCC UUG AGC ACG UCC CGG | G GGA CGU GCU CAA GGA GAU GA |
| 7805 | GAC GCC UUC GCC UUC AUC UCC | A GAU GAA GGC GAA GGC GUC CA |
| 7983 | GUC AAU UGG UGU CUC AGU GUC | C ACU GAG ACA CCA AUU GAC AC |
| 8155 | AUC CGU AUG AAG AGC CCA UCA | A UGG GCU CUU CAU ACG GAU UC |
| 8161 | AUU GGA AUC CGU AUG AAG AGC | U CUU CAU ACG GAU UCC AAU AC |
| 8468 | AAG UAA CAU GUG AGG GUA UUA | A UAC CCU CAC AUG UUA CUU GA |
| 8657 | AAG UCG UAU UCU GGU UUG GGC | C CAA ACC AGA AUA CGA CUU GG |
| 8674 | AUG AUG UUA UCA ACU CCA AGU | U UGG AGU UGA UAA CAU CAU GC |
| 8685 | AUU GGA GGA GCA UGA UGU UAU | A ACA UCA UGC UCC UCC AAU GU |
| 8819 | AUG AUG AUG UUG CCU AGC CAG | G GCU AGG CAA CAU CAU CAU GU |
| 8873 | AUG GAG AAG AAA UGA GUC AUC | U GAC UCA UUU CUU CUC CAU CC |
| 9336 | AUA GAU GCC UAC CCC UAC AGA | U GUA GGG GUA GGC AUC UAU CU |
a Position refers to the terminal 3’-end nucleotide position of the siRNA antisense strand in the HCV Con1 genome (GenBank accession number: AJ238799).
Fig 3Modified LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotide potency is reduced by point mutation in its target site.
(A) Schematic of the native (above) and mutant (below) siRNA 3570 target sites in the HCV replicon bound to LDM3570 (X, 5-OH-dC residue; +, LNA sugar base). (B, C) Huh-luc/neo-ET (black bars) and Huh-luc/neo-ET-3570mut (white bars) cells were transfected with increasing concentrations (x-axis) of LDM3570, LDM3570inv and siRNA 3570 (B) or LDM4676, LDM4676inv and siRNA 4676 (C). The HCV replication values (y-axis) were calculated as described for Fig 2B. The obtained values were subsequently normalized to those from mock-transfected control cells, which was set to 100%. Each panel represents data from one of two reproducible independent experiments.
Fig 4Effects of 8-oxo-dG residues on antisense potency and off-target effects of LNA/DNA gapmer oligonucleotides.
Huh-luc/neo-ET cells were transfected with increasing concentrations (x-axis) of various oligonucleotides (Table 1) targeting the 4676 site (A, B) or with inverted non-targeting control oligonucleotides (C, D). The error bars represent the standard deviation of seven independent experiments. (A, C) The effects of the oligonucleotides on HCV replication are shown on the y-axis. Transfection and normalization of Luc activity were performed as described for Fig 2B. The obtained values were subsequently normalized to those from mock-transfected control cells, which were set to 100%. The values for siRNA 4676, LD4676, and LDM4676 were fitted with a four-parameter dose-response equation (variable slope model); estimated EC50 values are shown in Table 4. (B, D) Percentage of living cells in transfected cell cultures. The total protein content in the lysates of transfected Huh-luc/neo-ET cells was normalized to that of mock-transfected cells (set to 100%) to obtain the percentage of living cells (y-axis).
EC50, CI and R2 values for LD4676, LDM4676, and siRNA 4676 estimated from seven independent experiments.
| ON/siRNA | EC50 (nM) | CI (nM) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| D4676 | ND | ND | ND |
| LD4676 | 5.5 | 0.9–32.9 | 0.77 |
| LDM4676 | 7.1 | 4.0–12.5 | 0.87 |
| siRNA 4676 | 0.13 | 0.03–0.5 | 0.95 |
CI = 95% confidence interval; R2 = goodness of a four-parametric nonlinear regression curve fit; ND = not determined.
Fig 58-oxo-dG residues reduce the Tm of duplexes between LNA/DNA gapmers and their targets.
The effects of 8-oxo-dG residues on the Tm of LNA/DNA gapmer ASO:DNA (A) and LNA/DNA gapmer ASO:RNA (B) duplexes were measured by FRET. Target DNA or RNA oligonucleotides (Table 2) were labeled with TYE563 at the 3’-end; the D4676, LD4676 and LDM4676 probes had FAM at the 5’-end. The measurements were performed, and the data are presented as described for Fig 1 (C). The effect of 8-oxo-dG residues on ASO:RNA duplex formation. Upper: schematic of the experimental setup. Applicable for some ASOs: Y, 8-oxo-dG residue; +, LNA sugar base. Lower: the 33P-labeled 37-nt ssRNA target was mixed with the indicated ASOs. The samples were collected immediately (“0”) or after incubation at 37°C for the indicated times. The obtained probes were resolved by native PAGE in 15% gels and imaged using a Typhoon Trio instrument. The positions of the ASO:RNA duplexes (“duplex”) and ssRNA are shown at right. (A-C) Each panel represents data from one of three reproducible independent experiments.
Fig 6RNase H-mediated degradation of pre-formed ASO:RNA duplexes and in vitro-synthesized RNAs targeted by ASOs.
(A) Schematic of the experimental setup for panels B and C. Applicable for some ASOs: Y, 8-oxo-dG residue; +, LNA sugar base. (B, C) Cleavage of pre-formed ASO:target RNA duplexes by RNase H. (B) Five femtomoles of 33P-labeled substrate was treated with RNase H for the indicated times. The reaction products were collected, denatured by heating at 95°C for 2 min and analyzed by PAGE in native 15% gels. Arrows at right point to the substrate (S) and major cleavage product(s) (P). Results from one of three independent reproducible experiments are shown. (C) Kinetics of RNase H cleavage of different ASO:RNA duplexes. The amounts of radioactivity remaining in the uncleaved substrate were quantified using a Typhoon Trio instrument. Quantifications were performed for each gel. The obtained values were normalized to the radioactivity present in the substrate before adding RNase H (set to 100%). Each point corresponds to the average of three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. (D) Cleavage of FR3131 RNA by RNase H in the presence of different ASOs. The RNA and ASOs were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 10 min; then, RNase H was added to the reaction mixture. RNA samples were collected at the indicated time points and analyzed by electrophoresis in native 0.8% TAE agarose gels. The results from one of three independent reproducible experiments are shown. S: substrate; P1 and P2: cleavage products.
Fig 78-oxo-dG residues increase the stability of ASOs in human serum.
(A) 33P-labeled D4676, DM4676, LD4676 and LDM4676 oligonucleotides (Table 1) were incubated in human serum at 37°C. Aliquots were collected at the indicated time points and analyzed by PAGE in native 15% gels. The results from one of three independent reproducible experiments are shown. (B) Quantitative representation of the stability of the oligonucleotides. The amounts of radioactivity remaining in the uncleaved ASOs were quantified using a Typhoon Trio instrument. Quantifications were performed for each gel. The obtained values were normalized to the radioactivity present in the substrate before incubation in human serum (set to 100%). The fraction of remaining ASO is shown as a single exponential decay function. Each point corresponds to the average from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard deviation; * p<0.05 and ** p<0.01 (Student’s t-test).