Hélène Billard1, Laure Simon2, Emmanuelle Desnots1, Agnès Sochard1, Cécile Boscher3, Alain Riaublanc4, Marie-Cécile Alexandre-Gouabau1, Clair-Yves Boquien5. 1. INRA, UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, Nantes, France Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine - Ouest, Nantes, France L'Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, Nantes, France. 2. INRA, UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, Nantes, France Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine - Ouest, Nantes, France L'Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, Nantes, France Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France. 3. Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France. 4. INRA, UR 1268 BIA (Biopolymères, Interactions, Assemblages), Nantes, France. 5. INRA, UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, Nantes, France Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine - Ouest, Nantes, France L'Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, Nantes, France clair-yves.boquien@univ-nantes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human milk composition analysis seems essential to adapt human milk fortification for preterm neonates. The Miris human milk analyzer (HMA), based on mid-infrared methodology, is convenient for a unique determination of macronutrients. However, HMA measurements are not totally comparable with reference methods (RMs). OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to compare HMA results with results from biochemical RMs for a large range of protein, fat, and carbohydrate contents and to establish a calibration adjustment. METHODS: Human milk was fractionated in protein, fat, and skim milk by covering large ranges of protein (0-3 g/100 mL), fat (0-8 g/100 mL), and carbohydrate (5-8 g/100 mL). For each macronutrient, a calibration curve was plotted by linear regression using measurements obtained using HMA and RMs. RESULTS: For fat, 53 measurements were performed, and the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.79RM + 0.28 (R(2) = 0.92). For true protein (29 measurements), the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.9RM + 0.23 (R(2) = 0.98). For carbohydrate (15 measurements), the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.59RM + 1.86 (R(2) = 0.95). A homogenization step with a disruptor coupled to a sonication step was necessary to obtain better accuracy of the measurements. Good repeatability (coefficient of variation < 7%) and reproducibility (coefficient of variation < 17%) were obtained after calibration adjustment. CONCLUSION: New calibration curves were developed for the Miris HMA, allowing accurate measurements in large ranges of macronutrient content. This is necessary for reliable use of this device in individualizing nutrition for preterm newborns.
BACKGROUND:Human milk composition analysis seems essential to adapt human milk fortification for preterm neonates. The Miris human milk analyzer (HMA), based on mid-infrared methodology, is convenient for a unique determination of macronutrients. However, HMA measurements are not totally comparable with reference methods (RMs). OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to compare HMA results with results from biochemical RMs for a large range of protein, fat, and carbohydrate contents and to establish a calibration adjustment. METHODS:Human milk was fractionated in protein, fat, and skim milk by covering large ranges of protein (0-3 g/100 mL), fat (0-8 g/100 mL), and carbohydrate (5-8 g/100 mL). For each macronutrient, a calibration curve was plotted by linear regression using measurements obtained using HMA and RMs. RESULTS: For fat, 53 measurements were performed, and the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.79RM + 0.28 (R(2) = 0.92). For true protein (29 measurements), the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.9RM + 0.23 (R(2) = 0.98). For carbohydrate (15 measurements), the linear regression equation was HMA = 0.59RM + 1.86 (R(2) = 0.95). A homogenization step with a disruptor coupled to a sonication step was necessary to obtain better accuracy of the measurements. Good repeatability (coefficient of variation < 7%) and reproducibility (coefficient of variation < 17%) were obtained after calibration adjustment. CONCLUSION: New calibration curves were developed for the Miris HMA, allowing accurate measurements in large ranges of macronutrient content. This is necessary for reliable use of this device in individualizing nutrition for preterm newborns.
Authors: Stefania Sbrizzi; Pasqua Anna Quitadamo; Domenico Ravidà; Giuseppina Palumbo; Pier Paolo Cristalli; Massimo Pettoello-Mantovani Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-09-12
Authors: Isabel Ten-Doménech; Victoria Ramos-Garcia; José David Piñeiro-Ramos; María Gormaz; Anna Parra-Llorca; Máximo Vento; Julia Kuligowski; Guillermo Quintás Journal: Metabolites Date: 2020-01-22