Literature DB >> 26037107

Assessment of sociodemographic and geographic disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in South Carolina.

Sacoby Wilson1, Kristen Burwell-Naney2, Chengsheng Jiang1, Hongmei Zhang3, Ashok Samantapudi4, Rianna Murray1, Laura Dalemarre5, LaShanta Rice6, Edith Williams6.   

Abstract

Populations of color and low-income communities are often disproportionately burdened by exposures to various environmental contaminants, including air pollution. Some air pollutants have carcinogenic properties that are particularly problematic in South Carolina (SC), a state that consistently has high rates of cancer mortality for all sites. The purpose of this study was to assess cancer risk disparities in SC by linking risk estimates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2005 National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) with sociodemographic data from the 2000 US Census Bureau. Specifically, NATA risk data for varying risk categories were linked by tract ID and analyzed with sociodemographic variables from the 2000 census using R. The average change in cancer risk from all sources by sociodemographic variable was quantified using multiple linear regression models. Spatial methods were further employed using ArcGIS 10 to assess the distribution of all source risk and percent non-white at each census tract level. The relative risk (RR) estimates of the proportion of high cancer risk tracts (defined as the top 10% of cancer risk in SC) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between the first and latter three quartiles defined by sociodemographic factors, while the variance in the percentage of high cancer risk between quartile groups was tested using Pearson's chi-square. The average total cancer risk for SC was 26.8 people/million (ppl/million). The risk from on-road sources was approximately 5.8 ppl/million, higher than the risk from major, area, and non-road sources (1.8, 2.6, and 1.3 ppl/million), respectively. Based on our findings, addressing on-road sources may decrease the disproportionate cancer risk burden among low-income populations and communities of color in SC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer risk; Environmental justice; Geographic Information Systems (GIS); National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA); South Carolina

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037107      PMCID: PMC4492882          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  12 in total

1.  Cumulative cancer risk from air pollution in Houston: disparities in risk burden and social disadvantage.

Authors:  Stephen H Linder; Dritana Marko; Ken Sexton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Assessment of the distribution of toxic release inventory facilities in metropolitan Charleston: an environmental justice case study.

Authors:  Sacoby M Wilson; Herb Fraser-Rahim; Edith Williams; Hongmei Zhang; LaShanta Rice; Erik Svendsen; Winston Abara
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Public health implications of 1990 air toxics concentrations across the United States.

Authors:  T J Woodruff; D A Axelrad; J Caldwell; R Morello-Frosch; A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and Environmental Injustice: Is There a Hidden and Unequal Threat to Public Health in South Carolina?

Authors:  Sacoby Wilson; Hongmei Zhang; Kristen Burwell; Ashok Samantapudi; Laura Dalemarre; Chengsheng Jiang; Lashanta Rice; Edith Williams; Charles Naney
Journal:  Environ Justice       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland.

Authors:  Benjamin J Apelberg; Timothy J Buckley; Ronald H White
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Urban air pollution and health inequities: a workshop report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Assessment of Particulate Matter Levels in Vulnerable Communities in North Charleston, South Carolina prior to Port Expansion.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Scott Reynolds; Olalekan A Ogunsakin; Edith M Williams; Herb Fraser-Rahim; Hongmei Zhang; Sacoby M Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2014-03-12

9.  Use of segregation indices, Townsend Index, and air toxics data to assess lifetime cancer risk disparities in metropolitan Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Authors:  LaShanta J Rice; Chengsheng Jiang; Sacoby M Wilson; Kristen Burwell-Naney; Ashok Samantapudi; Hongmei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Spatial disparity in the distribution of superfund sites in South Carolina: an ecological study.

Authors:  Kristen Burwell-Naney; Hongmei Zhang; Ashok Samantapudi; Chengsheng Jiang; Laura Dalemarre; LaShanta Rice; Edith Williams; Sacoby Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cancer risk from air toxics in relation to neighborhood isolation and sociodemographic characteristics: A spatial analysis of the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Cheuk Yui Yeung; Masayoshi Oka
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Using GIS Mapping to Target Public Health Interventions: Examining Birth Outcomes Across GIS Techniques.

Authors:  E L MacQuillan; A B Curtis; K M Baker; R Paul; Y O Back
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

Review 3.  Cumulative Risk and Impact Modeling on Environmental Chemical and Social Stressors.

Authors:  Hongtai Huang; Aolin Wang; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Juleen Lam; Marina Sirota; Amy Padula; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Ethnic density and cancer: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Fang; Marilyn Tseng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A multivariate analysis of CalEnviroScreen: comparing environmental and socioeconomic stressors versus chronic disease.

Authors:  Ben K Greenfield; Jayant Rajan; Thomas E McKone
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  A Model-to-Monitor Evaluation of 2011 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA).

Authors:  Zhuqing Xue; Chunrong Jia
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2019-03-10

7.  Using Bayesian time-stratified case-crossover models to examine associations between air pollution and "asthma seasons" in a low air pollution environment.

Authors:  Matthew Bozigar; Andrew B Lawson; John L Pearce; Erik R Svendsen; John E Vena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.