Literature DB >> 31708169

Cancer risk from air toxics in relation to neighborhood isolation and sociodemographic characteristics: A spatial analysis of the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA.

Christine C Ekenga1, Cheuk Yui Yeung2, Masayoshi Oka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has examined relationships between neighborhood characteristics and exposure to air toxics in the United States. However, a limited number of studies have addressed neighborhood isolation, a measure of spatial segregation. We investigated the spatial distribution of carcinogenic air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area and tested the hypothesis that neighborhood isolation and sociodemographic characteristics are associated with exposure to carcinogenic air toxics.
METHODS: We obtained lifetime air toxics cancer risk data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's National Air Toxic Assessment and sociodemographic data from the American Community Survey. We used geographic information systems to identify statistically significant clusters of census tracts with elevated all-site cancer risk due to air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area. Relative Risks (RR) were estimated for the association between neighborhood characteristics and air toxic hot spots. Using a local spatial isolation index to evaluate residential segregation, we also evaluated the association between neighborhood racial and economic isolation and air toxic hot spots.
RESULTS: Approximately 14% (85 of the 615) of census tracts had elevated cancer risk due to air toxics (p < 0.01). These air toxic hot spots were independently associated with neighborhoods with high levels of poverty and unemployment and low levels of education. Census tracts with the highest levels of both racial isolation of Blacks and economic isolation of poverty were more likely to be located in air toxic hotspots than those with low combined racial and economic isolation (RR = 5.34; 95% CI = 3.10-9.22).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide strong evidence of unequal distribution of carcinogenic air toxics in the St. Louis metropolitan area. Study results may be used to inform public health efforts to eliminate sociodemographic inequalities in exposure to air pollutants.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Cancer; Disparity; Geographic information system; Sociodemographic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708169      PMCID: PMC6901107          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  34 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure.

Authors:  Gary W Evans; Elyse Kantrowitz
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Assessment of sociodemographic and geographic disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in South Carolina.

Authors:  Sacoby Wilson; Kristen Burwell-Naney; Chengsheng Jiang; Hongmei Zhang; Ashok Samantapudi; Rianna Murray; Laura Dalemarre; LaShanta Rice; Edith Williams
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Asian Americans and disproportionate exposure to carcinogenic hazardous air pollutants: A national study.

Authors:  Sara E Grineski; Timothy W Collins; Danielle X Morales
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: a Global Review.

Authors:  Anjum Hajat; Charlene Hsia; Marie S O'Neill
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

5.  Race/ethnicity, residential segregation, and exposure to ambient air pollution: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Miranda R Jones; Ana V Diez-Roux; Anjum Hajat; Kiarri N Kershaw; Marie S O'Neill; Eliseo Guallar; Wendy S Post; Joel D Kaufman; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Is segregation bad for your health?

Authors:  Michael R Kramer; Carol R Hogue
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland.

Authors:  Benjamin J Apelberg; Timothy J Buckley; Ronald H White
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Urban air pollution and health inequities: a workshop report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Use of segregation indices, Townsend Index, and air toxics data to assess lifetime cancer risk disparities in metropolitan Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Authors:  LaShanta J Rice; Chengsheng Jiang; Sacoby M Wilson; Kristen Burwell-Naney; Ashok Samantapudi; Hongmei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Particulate air pollution and health inequalities: a Europe-wide ecological analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Richardson; Jamie Pearce; Helena Tunstall; Richard Mitchell; Niamh K Shortt
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modified Radical Mastectomy in De Novo Stage IV Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Authors:  J C Chen; Yaming Li; James L Fisher; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Allan Tsung; Jose G Bazan; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 2.  Systematic review of neighborhood socioeconomic indices studied across the cancer control continuum.

Authors:  Kristen A Sorice; Carolyn Y Fang; Daniel Wiese; Angel Ortiz; Yuku Chen; Kevin A Henry; Shannon M Lynch
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.