Hongtai Huang1,2, Aolin Wang3,4, Rachel Morello-Frosch3,5, Juleen Lam3, Marina Sirota4,6, Amy Padula3, Tracey J Woodruff3. 1. Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Hongtai.Huang@ucsf.edu. 2. Institute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Hongtai.Huang@ucsf.edu. 3. Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Institute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, and the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review is to identify cumulative modeling methods used to evaluate combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors. The specific review question is: What are the existing quantitative methods used to examine the cumulative impacts of exposures to environmental chemical and social stressors on health? RECENT FINDINGS: There has been an increase in literature that evaluates combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors on health using regression models; very few studies applied other data mining and machine learning techniques to this problem. The majority of studies we identified used regression models to evaluate combined effects of multiple environmental and social stressors. With proper study design and appropriate modeling assumptions, additional data mining methods may be useful to examine combined effects of environmental and social stressors.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review is to identify cumulative modeling methods used to evaluate combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors. The specific review question is: What are the existing quantitative methods used to examine the cumulative impacts of exposures to environmental chemical and social stressors on health? RECENT FINDINGS: There has been an increase in literature that evaluates combined effects of exposures to environmental chemicals and social stressors on health using regression models; very few studies applied other data mining and machine learning techniques to this problem. The majority of studies we identified used regression models to evaluate combined effects of multiple environmental and social stressors. With proper study design and appropriate modeling assumptions, additional data mining methods may be useful to examine combined effects of environmental and social stressors.
Authors: Erik J Nelson; Enbal Shacham; Brian B Boutwell; Richard Rosenfeld; Mario Schootman; Michael Vaughn; Roger Lewis Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Helena M Skröder; Jena D Hamadani; Fahmida Tofail; Lars Åke Persson; Marie E Vahter; Maria J Kippler Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Maria Kippler; Fahmida Tofail; Jena D Hamadani; Renee M Gardner; Sally M Grantham-McGregor; Matteo Bottai; Marie Vahter Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Agnieszka Genowska; Jacek Jamiołkowski; Krystyna Szafraniec; Urszula Stepaniak; Andrzej Szpak; Andrzej Pająk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Misbath Daouda; Lucas Henneman; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Alison Gemmill; Corwin Zigler; Joan Casey Journal: Environ Res Lett Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Emanuel Alcala; Paul Brown; John A Capitman; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Ricardo Cisneros Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Devon C Payne-Sturges; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Robin C Puett; Stephen B Thomas; Ross Hammond; Peter S Hovmand Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 11.035