Literature DB >> 26034757

Seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella and varicella antibodies in the United States population, 2009-2010.

Emmaculate J Lebo1, Deanna M Kruszon-Moran2, Mona Marin1, William J Bellini1, Scott Schmid1, Stephanie R Bialek1, Gregory S Wallace1, Huong Q McLean3.   

Abstract

Background.  In the United States, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella immunity is now primarily achieved through vaccination. Monitoring population immunity is necessary. Methods.  We evaluated seroprevalence of antibodies to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during 2009-2010. Results.  Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella seroprevalence was 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.9%-93.0%), 87.6% (CI, 85.8%-89.2%), 95.3% (CI, 94.3%-96.2%), and 97.8% (CI, 97.1%-98.3%), respectively. United States (US)-born persons had lower mumps seroprevalence and higher varicella seroprevalence than non-US born persons. Conclusions.  Seroprevalence was high (88%-98%) for all 4 viruses in the US population during 2009-2010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NHANES; antibodies; chickenpox; measles; mumps; rubella; seroepidemiologic studies.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26034757      PMCID: PMC4438887          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofv006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella are acute viral diseases that are preventable by vaccination. In the United States (US), routine measles, rubella, and mumps vaccination of children was initiated in 1963, 1969, and 1977, respectively. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended routine use of the combination measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in 1977 and a 2-dose schedule at ages 12–15 months and 4–6 years in 1989 [1]. As a result of high MMR vaccination coverage (≥90% in children aged 19–35 months), incidence declined; endemic transmission of measles was declared eliminated in 2000 and documented for rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in 2004 [2, 3]. However, import-associated cases continue to occur in the US, because measles and rubella remain endemic in other countries. Reported mumps cases also declined to an average of <300 cases annually by the early 2000s, with outbreaks occurring in limited settings [1, 4, 5]. The varicella vaccination program was implemented in 1996 as a 1-dose program. By the end of the first decade of the program, vaccination coverage reached 90% among children aged 19–35 months and incidence declined by 90% [6]. However, outbreaks continued to occur among highly vaccinated populations [7]. In 2006, ACIP recommended implementation of a routine 2-dose program, with vaccination at the same ages as MMR vaccine [6]. Further reductions in incidence and outbreaks have been reported since 2006 [8]. To sustain these achievements, high population immunity is needed. Reported antibody seroprevalence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004 was 96%, 90%, and 91% for MMR respectively [9-11]. Varicella seroprevalence among those aged 6–19 and 20–49 years was 94% and 98%, respectively [12]. Monitoring population seroprevalence remains important to potentially identify subgroups with higher susceptibility and guide national immunization policies. We assessed seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella antibodies in the US civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 6–49 years using samples from NHANES 2009–2010.

METHODS

The NHANES is conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to assess the health and nutritional status of the US population. The survey uses a stratified, multistage, probability-cluster design, to provide a sample representative of the civilian noninstitutionalized US population. Survey participants undergo household interviews, standardized physical examinations, and provide biological samples for testing. Non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics were oversampled to provide stable estimates for these groups. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the Institutional Review Board of NCHS, CDC approved the protocol. Serum samples from NHANES participants aged 6–49 years during 2009–2010 were tested for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies of interest. Commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent IgG assays (IgG ELISA II; Wampole Laboratories) were used for the detection and qualitative determination of IgG antibody to MMR viruses. IgG antibodies to measles and mumps viruses were categorized based on index standard ratio (ISR) values as follows: seronegative, ISR of ≤0.90; indeterminate, ISR of 0.91–1.09; and seropositive, ISR of ≥1.10. For rubella, values of ≥10 IU were considered seropositive. Seronegative and indeterminate samples were retested with an equal number of randomly selected seropositive samples. Samples that initially tested indeterminate then positive on retesting were categorized as seropositive; negative or indeterminate samples were categorized as negative for this study. Discordant results were reconciled by 1 additional test; the final result was used. For quality assurance, a 10% random-sample repeat of the entire specimen collection set was performed. For varicella, the CDC in-house varicella whole-cell enzyme immunoassay (W-EIA) was used; IgG antibodies were categorized based on optical density (OD). Samples with OD of ≥0.250 were considered seropositive. Samples testing W-EIA negative (OD of <0.170) or indeterminate (OD of 0.170–0.249) were retested using a more sensitive glycoprotein antigen-based EIA (gpELISA) appropriate for detection of vaccine-induced antibodies [12]. Samples were considered seropositive if gpELISA-adjusted OD was ≥0.200 and considered seronegative if <0.200. Procedures used in previous analysis of NHANES measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella data were used here [9-12]. Participants were grouped by birth year (1957–1966, 1967–1976, 1977–1986, 1987–1998, and 1999–2004) and age (6–11 years, 12–19 years, 20–29 years, 30–39 years, and 40–49 years) [9-12]. Race and Hispanic origin were based on the respondent's self-assessment and categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, and other (subjects who did not self-select into the previous groups or reported multiple races). Separate estimates were not reported for the other race/ethnic group, but these individuals were included in all other estimates. Birthplace was coded as US and non-US. Estimates were weighted to represent the total civilian noninstitutionalized US household population and account for oversampling and nonresponse [13]. Standard errors were calculated accounting for the complex sample design using SUDAAN software (version 11.0.1). Estimates were considered unstable if the relative standard error around the percent seronegative participants was >30% or if based on <10 seronegative persons. The exact binomial method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) [14]. The t tests were used to assess differences between groups; P values < .05 were considered significant. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made.

RESULTS

Response Rates

Of 6981 persons aged 6–49 years sampled for NHANES 2009–2010, 5785 (83%) were interviewed and 5652 (81%) were examined. Of those examined, 5054 (89%) had serum samples available for testing. The percent of participants with tested samples varied by age (6–11 years, 79%; 12–49 years, ≥90%), race/Hispanic origin (Mexican American, 92%; non-Hispanic white, 89%; non-Hispanic black, 86%; P < .05), and birthplace (US, 88%; non-US, 94%; P < .05), but not sex.

Seroprevalence of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Antibody

During 2009–2010, among the US population aged 6–49 years, MMR seroprevalence was 92.0% (95% CI, 90.9%–93.0%), 87.6% (95% CI, 85.8%–89.2%), and 95.3% (95% CI, 94.3%–96.2%), respectively. Measles and mumps seroprevalence was higher among those aged 6–11 years compared to all other age groups (P < .05) (Table 1). Rubella seroprevalence was also highest among those aged 6–11 years, but this estimate was unstable (based on <10 negative persons with a relative standard error of >40%). Seroprevalence was lowest among those aged 30–39 years compared to each other age group for all 3 outcomes, but these differences only reached statistical significance for measles. Rubella seroprevalence was higher in females than males (97.2% vs 93.5%; P < .001), but no gender differences were observed for measles and mumps.
Table 1.

Seroprevalence of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella Antibodies by Demographic Characteristics: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010.

nMeasles
Mumps
Rubella
Varicella
% (95% CI)P Value% (95% CI)P Value% (95% CI)P Value% (95% CI)P Value
Overall505492.0 (90.9–93.0)87.6 (85.8–89.2)95.3 (94.3–96.2)97.8 (97.1–98.3)
Age
 6–11 years (ref)96096.8 (94.5–98.4)91.9 (89.3–94.1)99.1 (97.9–99.7)a98.0 (96.0–99.1)b
 12–19 years117293.2 (89.8–95.7)<.0586.9 (83.2–90.1)<.0597.0 (95.5–98.2)<.0197.1 (95.7–98.2)NS
 20–29 years95093.3 (90.9–95.3)<.0587.7 (84.8–90.3)<.0595.8 (94.2–97.0)<.00197.6 (96.0–98.7)NS
 30–39 years93787.9 (84.8–90.6)<.00185.6 (81.5–89.2)<.0193.4 (90.9–95.3)<.00197.0 (94.6–98.5)NS
 40–49 years103591.2 (89.0–93.2)<.00187.8 (84.9–90.2)<.0593.8 (91.8–95.4)<.00198.9 (97.8–99.6)bNS
Sex
 Male248391.5 (89.2–93.5)NS86.8 (84.8–88.7)NS93.5 (92.2–94.6)<.00197.6 (96.8–98.3)NS
 Female257192.4 (91.0–93.7)88.4 (86.3–90.2)97.2 (96.1–98.0)97.9 (97.2–98.4)
Race/Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white (ref)197191.3 (89.5–92.9)85.8 (83.1–88.1)95.0 (93.6–96.2)98.5 (97.9–99.0)
 Non-Hispanic black92896.2 (94.9–97.2)<.00192.0 (89.1–94.3)<.00197.2 (95.9–98.2)<.0196.3 (95.0–97.4)<.01
 Mexican American123287.0 (84.9–88.9)<.0189.0 (87.3–90.6)<.0594.2 (92.0–95.9)NS97.8 (96.6–98.7)NS
Birthplace
 Non-US109992.2 (89.6–94.3)NS92.3 (89.9–94.2)<.00195.8 (94.1–97.2)NS95.6 (93.7–97.1)<.01
 US395191.9 (90.5–93.2)86.6 (84.7–88.4)95.2 (94.0–96.2)98.2 (97.6–98.7)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant (P > .05); ref, reference group.

a Estimates unstable based on <10 negative sample persons and relative standard error >40%.

b Estimates unstable relative standard error >30%.

Seroprevalence of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella Antibodies by Demographic Characteristics: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant (P > .05); ref, reference group. a Estimates unstable based on <10 negative sample persons and relative standard error >40%. b Estimates unstable relative standard error >30%. Seroprevalence was significantly higher among non-Hispanic blacks than non-Hispanic whites for all 3 outcomes (P < .01) (Table 1) and among non-Hispanic blacks than Mexican Americans for measles and rubella (P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). Non-Hispanic whites had higher measles seroprevalence than Mexican Americans but lower mumps seroprevalence (P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). There was no difference in rubella seroprevalence between non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans. US-born persons had lower mumps seroprevalence compared to non-US born persons (86.6% vs 92.3%; P < .001), but no differences were observed for measles and rubella. Trends by birth cohorts were similar for measles, mumps, and rubella, with the highest seroprevalence among those born during 1999–2004 and lowest among those born during 1967–1976 (Figure 1). There was a significant linear increase in all 3 outcomes from the 1967–1976 to the 1999–2004 birth cohort (P < .001). However, the 1999–2004 birth cohort rubella seroprevalence estimate was unstable.
Figure 1.

Seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and varicella antibodies by birth cohorts: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010. *For MMR: P < .001 for the test for linear trend from the 1967–1976 birth cohort to the 1999–2004 birth cohort; †Estimate for Rubella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1999–2004 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 51% and it is based on 6 seronegative samples; ^Estimate for Varicella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1957–1966 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 43% and it is based on 5 seronegative samples; ϕEstimate for Varicella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1999–2004 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 50%.

Seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and varicella antibodies by birth cohorts: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2010. *For MMR: P < .001 for the test for linear trend from the 1967–1976 birth cohort to the 1999–2004 birth cohort; †Estimate for Rubella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1999–2004 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 51% and it is based on 6 seronegative samples; ^Estimate for Varicella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1957–1966 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 43% and it is based on 5 seronegative samples; ϕEstimate for Varicella seroprevalence for birth cohort 1999–2004 may be unstable. Relative standard error = 50%.

Seroprevalence of Varicella Antibody

Varicella seroprevalence was 97.8% (95% CI, 97.1%–98.3%) and consistently high across all age groups. Seroprevalence was lower among non-Hispanic blacks than non-Hispanic whites (P < .01) and Mexican Americans (P = .05) (96.3%, 98.5%, and 97.8%, respectively). Seroprevalence was higher in US-born than non-US born persons (98.2% vs 95.6%; P < .01). There was little variability across birth cohorts (Figure 1). However, estimates for the 1957–1966 and 1999–2004 birth cohorts were unstable.

DISCUSSION

Overall seroprevalence remains high for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella antibodies in the US population aged 6–49 years during 2009–2010. Seroprevalence was highest among those aged 6–11 years, a group likely to have been vaccinated recently. Lower estimates in older age groups (birth cohort 1967–1976) for MMR is consistent with findings from previous NHANES and could be a result of lower vaccination levels, changes in vaccine policy, and declining disease prevalence, and immunosenescence [9, 10]. US-born persons had lower mumps and higher varicella seroprevalence than non-US born persons. Lower seroprevalence among some subgroups may indicate populations at increased risk for transmission and outbreaks of these vaccine-preventable diseases. High measles seroprevalence reflects high vaccine coverage nationally; however, 8% of persons aged 6–49 years were found to be susceptible. Susceptibility is likely to be even higher if we considered children aged <12 months. Susceptible persons remain at risk for measles in the US, primarily due to importation. During 2001–2011, 88% of the 911 reported measles cases were import-associated [15]. As long as measles remains endemic in other countries, importations will continue with the risk for sustained outbreaks among unvaccinated populations. Seroprevalence was lower for mumps than measles and rubella. Lower seroprevalence may be explained by the lower effectiveness of the mumps component of the MMR vaccine estimated at 88% (range, 66–95%) compared with 97% (range, 67%–100%) for measles and 97% (range, 94%–100%) for rubella [1]. However, although antibody measurements are often used as surrogate measures of immunity, no serologic tests that reliably predict immunity are available for mumps. Although recent mumps outbreaks occurred in populations with high 2-dose coverage, they were limited to intense exposure settings, with limited spread outside these settings [4, 5]. To maintain control of mumps, it remains important to ensure appropriate MMR vaccination among children and persons in settings with the potential for intense exposure and transmission of mumps (eg, schools, colleges, correctional facilities, congregate living facilities, or healthcare settings) [1]. Rubella seroprevalence was high (>93%) in all subgroups. As a result, few rubella and only 4 CRS cases have been reported through national surveillance during 2005–2011 [1, 15]. The higher rubella seroprevalence during 2009–2010 in women than men likely reflects continued efforts to vaccinate susceptible women of child-bearing age as part of the efforts to maintain CRS elimination. During 2009–2010, varicella seroprevalence was high across all age groups. Age group-specific estimates were similar to estimates from NHANES 1999–2004, except children aged 6–11 years, where seroprevalence increased from 88.9% to 98.0% [12]. Considering the low varicella incidence among children in the last decade, this increase could be directly attributed to the successful implementation of routine varicella vaccination in the US starting in 1996. By 2008, 1-dose varicella vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months reached 91% [16]. Fewer children will enter adolescence and adulthood susceptible to varicella and at risk of severe disease. Similar to previous studies, seroprevalence was lower in those born outside compared with inside the US [12]. Providers should continue to assess evidence of immunity for all non-US born adults, irrespective of age. This study has several limitations. Sample sizes for subgroup estimates were limited or unstable because data was only available for 2 survey years. Hence, results for these subgroups should be interpreted with caution. Second, ELISA testing methods for measles and rubella differed from NHANES 1999–2004; therefore, the 2 survey periods were not directly comparable. Finally, NHANES does not collect disease or vaccination history so we were unable to distinguish between seropositivity due to infection versus vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from NHANES 2009–2010 indicate high seroprevalence to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in the civilian non-institutionalized US population aged 6–49 years and provides evidence to support sustained maintenance of elimination of measles, rubella, and CRS, and low mumps and varicella incidence in the US. Measles and rubella remain endemic in much of the world with ongoing risk for importation to the US. Monitoring seroprevalence is an important component of understanding risks for these diseases in the US.
  15 in total

1.  The evidence for the elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in the United States: a public health achievement.

Authors:  Susan E Reef; Stephen L Cochi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Seroprevalence of measles antibody in the US population, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Terri B Hyde; Bagher Forghani; William Bellini; Gustavo H Dayan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Varicella seroprevalence in the U.S.: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Meredith A Reynolds; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Aisha Jumaan; D Scott Schmid; Geraldine M McQuillan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Elimination of endemic measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome from the Western hemisphere: the US experience.

Authors:  Mark J Papania; Gregory S Wallace; Paul A Rota; Joseph P Icenogle; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Gregory L Armstrong; Susan E Reef; Susan B Redd; Emily S Abernathy; Albert E Barskey; Lijuan Hao; Huong Q McLean; Jennifer S Rota; William J Bellini; Jane F Seward
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Recent resurgence of mumps in the United States.

Authors:  Gustavo H Dayan; M Patricia Quinlisk; Amy A Parker; Albert E Barskey; Meghan L Harris; Jennifer M Hill Schwartz; Kae Hunt; Carol G Finley; Dennis P Leschinsky; Anne L O'Keefe; Joshua Clayton; Lon K Kightlinger; Eden G Dietle; Jeffrey Berg; Cynthia L Kenyon; Susan T Goldstein; Shannon K Stokley; Susan B Redd; Paul A Rota; Jennifer Rota; Daoling Bi; Sandra W Roush; Carolyn B Bridges; Tammy A Santibanez; Umesh Parashar; William J Bellini; Jane F Seward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Changing varicella epidemiology in active surveillance sites--United States, 1995-2005.

Authors:  Dalya Guris; Aisha O Jumaan; Laurene Mascola; Barbara M Watson; John X Zhang; Sandra S Chaves; Paul Gargiullo; Dana Perella; Rachel Civen; Jane F Seward
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Impact of a routine two-dose varicella vaccination program on varicella epidemiology.

Authors:  Stephanie R Bialek; Dana Perella; John Zhang; Laurene Mascola; Kendra Viner; Christina Jackson; Adriana S Lopez; Barbara Watson; Rachel Civen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Prevention of measles, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome, and mumps, 2013: summary recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Authors:  Huong Q McLean; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Jonathan L Temte; Gregory S Wallace
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2013-06-14

9.  Prevention of varicella: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Authors:  Mona Marin; Dalya Güris; Sandra S Chaves; Scott Schmid; Jane F Seward
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2007-06-22

10.  Mumps outbreak in Orthodox Jewish communities in the United States.

Authors:  Albert E Barskey; Cynthia Schulte; Jennifer B Rosen; Elizabeth F Handschur; Elizabeth Rausch-Phung; Margaret K Doll; Kisha P Cummings; E Oscar Alleyne; Patricia High; Jacqueline Lawler; Andria Apostolou; Debra Blog; Christopher M Zimmerman; Barbara Montana; Rafael Harpaz; Carole J Hickman; Paul A Rota; Jennifer S Rota; William J Bellini; Kathleen M Gallagher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  27 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Varicella Susceptibility Among Refugees to Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Geneviève Cadieux; Vanessa Redditt; Daniela Graziano; Meb Rashid
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

2.  Varicella Vaccination Among US Adolescents: Coverage and Missed Opportunities, 2007-2014.

Authors:  Jessica Leung; Sarah Reagan-Steiner; Adriana Lopez; Jenny Jeyarajah; Mona Marin
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 May/Jun

3.  Seroprevalence and durability of rubella virus antibodies in a highly immunized population.

Authors:  Stephen N Crooke; Iana H Haralambieva; Diane E Grill; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Richard B Kennedy; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  The Clinical Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination to Prevent Measles Importations Among International Travelers From the United States.

Authors:  Emily P Hyle; Naomi F Fields; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Allison Taylor Walker; Paul Gastañaduy; Sowmya R Rao; Edward T Ryan; Regina C LaRocque; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Measles in our time: the US experience.

Authors:  Anne Schuchat
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 1.831

6.  Seropositivity of measles antibodies in the Israeli population prior to the nationwide 2018 - 2019 outbreak.

Authors:  Ravit Bassal; Victoria Indenbaum; Rakefet Pando; Tal Levin; Eilat Shinar; Doron Amichay; Mira Barak; Anat Ben-Dor; Adina Bar Haim; Ella Mendelson; Dani Cohen; Tamy Shohat
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Carrier Cells for Delivery of Oncolytic Measles Virus into Tumors: Determinants of Efficient Loading.

Authors:  Chun Xu; Mao Xia; Gang Meng; Chunyan Li; Aiqin Jiang; Jiwu Wei
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.327

8.  The declining antibody level of measles virus in China population, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Ying Hu; Peishan Lu; Xiuying Deng; Hongxiong Guo; Minghao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Varicella immunization requirements for US colleges: 2014-2015 academic year.

Authors:  Jessica Leung; Mona Marin; Victor Leino; Susan Even; Stephanie R Bialek
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2016-01-30

10.  Risk of Absence of Measles Antibody in Healthcare Personnel and Efficacy of Booster Vaccination.

Authors:  Chung-Jong Kim; Ji-Yun Bae; Kang-Il Jun; Hae-Sun Chung; Aeyeon Kim; Jihee Kim; Hee-Jung Son; Miae Lee; Hee-Jung Choi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.