| Literature DB >> 26034655 |
Soukeina Gheith1, Fatma Saghrouni2, Wadiaa Bannour3, Yosra Ben Youssef4, Abderrahim Khelif4, Anne-Cécile Normand5, Renaud Piarroux5, Moncef Ben Said2, Mansour Njah6, Stéphane Ranque5.
Abstract
The resistance of Aspergillus species to antifungal is increasingly reported and the knowledge of the local epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility pattern is pivotal to define adequate treatment policies. Our study aimed to: 1) describe the in vitro antifungal susceptibility profile of the Aspergillus species isolated from patients with haematological malignancies in Tunisia; 2) compare the E-test and Sensititre Yeast-One assays for the detection of paradoxical growth and trailing effect, both phenotypes commonly exhibited by Aspergillus spp. upon exposure to caspofungin and 3) to evaluate the mortality rate in patients according to the causative Aspergillus species and the antifungal treatment. We tested amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and caspofungin against 48 Aspergillus isolates (17, A. niger; 18, A. flavus; 9, A. tubingensis; 1, A. westerdijkiae; and 1, A. ochraceus) with the E-test. Minimal inhibition concentrations were above the epidemiological cut-off values for amphotericin B in 67% of A. flavus strains; for caspofungin in 22% of A. flavus strains; and for itraconazole in 22% of A. tubingensis strains, voriconazole and posaconazole MICs were below the epidemiological cut-off values for all strains. When exposed to caspofungin, 42% of the strains exhibited trailing effect and 38% paradoxical growth. Trailing effect occurred in 61% of A. flavus strains and paradoxical growth in 62% of Aspergillus section Nigri strains. E-test and Sensititre Yeast-One assays were only fairly concordant for the detection of these phenotypes. Repeatability of both assays was high for trailing effect but poor for paradoxical growth. The relatively high frequency of amphotericin B resistant strains makes voriconazole best adapted as a first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis from amphotericin B to voriconazole in this hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Amphotericin B; Antifungal drugs; Aspergillus; Caspofungin; Haematological malignancies; In vitro susceptibility; In vitro susceptibility testing; Invasive aspergillosis; Itraconazole; MIC; Paradoxical growth; Posaconazole; Trailing effect; Voriconazole
Year: 2014 PMID: 26034655 PMCID: PMC4447766 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Epidemiological cut-off values for amphotericin, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and caspofungin according to the species
| Species | AMB a (mg/l) | ITR b (mg/l) | VOR c (mg/l) | POS d (mg/l) | CS e (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 |
|
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
|
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
|
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 |
|
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
aamphotericin; bitraconazole; cvoriconazole; dposaconazole; ecaspofungin.
MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 of the 48 clinical isolates
| MIC (mg/l) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Antifungal agent | Range | MIC 50 | MIC 90 | % > ECV f |
|
|
| 0.04–1.5 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 0 |
|
| 0.38–2 | 0.98 | 2 | 0 | |
|
| 0.05–0.12 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0 | |
|
| 0.05–0.25 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.008–0.12 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0 | |
|
|
| 0.5–0.32 | 6 | 20.8 | 66.6 |
|
| 0.25–1 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 0 | |
|
| 0.06–0.5 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.06–0.25 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.004–32 | 0.064 | 32 | 22.2 | |
|
|
| 0.09–0.5 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 0 |
|
| 0.25–8 | 0.19 | 4.8 | 22.2 | |
|
| 0.064–0.38 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0 | |
|
| 0.047–0.25 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.008–0.012 | 0.01 | 0.012 | 0 | |
|
|
| 3–6 | NRg | NR | NR |
|
| 0.8–0.5 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.06–0.13 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.06–0.13 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.06–0.06 | 0.064 | NR | NR | |
|
|
| 3–24 | NR | NR | NR |
|
| 0.38–1 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.04–0.06 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.09–0.25 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
| 0.023–0.13 | NR | NR | NR | |
|
|
| 0.04–32 | 0.63 | 13.2 | 25 |
|
| 0.25–8 | 0.5 | 2 | 4.1 | |
|
| 0.04–0.5 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.05–0.25 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0 | |
|
| 0.004–32 | 0.023 | 0.125 | 8.3 | |
aamphotericin; bitraconazole; cvoriconazole; dposaconazole; ecaspofungin; fepidemiologic cut-off value; gnot relevant.
Figure 1Caspofungin testing phenotypes of spp. with the Sensititre Yeast-One (SYO, Trek Diagnostic Systems) and the E-test (bioMérieux) assays. Clear end point (A. tubingensis, panel A1, SYO; panel A2, E-test), Paradoxical growth (A. niger, panel B1, SYO; panel B2, E-test) and Trailing effect (A. flavus, panel C1, SYO; panel C2, E-test).
Caspofungin E-test susceptibility testing phenotypes in 48 isolates
| Clear end point | Trailing effect | Paradoxical growth | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | (6%) | 4 | (23.5%) | 12 | (70.5%) |
|
| 4 | (44.5%) | 1 | (11%) | 4 | (44.5%) |
|
| 5 | (28%) | 11 | (61%) | 2 | (11%) |
|
| 0 | 2 | (100%) | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | (100%) | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | (100%) | 0 | ||
|
| 10 | (21%) | 20 | (42%) | 18 | (38%) |
Repeatability of triplicate caspofungin E-test and SYO susceptibility testing results
| Isolate | Species | E-test | SYO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear end point | Trailing effect | Paradoxical growth | Clear end point | Trailing effect | Paradoxical growth | ||
| 1 |
| 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 |
| 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 |
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 9 |
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 10 |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Univariate analysis of the patients’ outcome according to the species and antifungal treatment
| Death | Survival | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6 (33%) | 12 (40%) | 0.81 | |
|
| 10 (56%) | 16 (53%) | ||
|
| 2 (11%) | 2 (11%) | ||
|
|
| 7 (39%) | 3 (10%) | 0.02 |
|
| 2 (11%) | 12 (40%) | ||
|
| 9 (50%) | 15 (50%) | ||