Literature DB >> 27708619

Epidemiological and Genomic Landscape of Azole Resistance Mechanisms in Aspergillus Fungi.

Daisuke Hagiwara1, Akira Watanabe1, Katsuhiko Kamei1, Gustavo H Goldman2.   

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis is a life-threatening mycosis caused by the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus. The predominant causal species is Aspergillus fumigatus, and azole drugs are the treatment of choice. Azole drugs approved for clinical use include itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and the recently added isavuconazole. However, epidemiological research has indicated that the prevalence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates has increased significantly over the last decade. What is worse is that azole-resistant strains are likely to have emerged not only in response to long-term drug treatment but also because of exposure to azole fungicides in the environment. Resistance mechanisms include amino acid substitutions in the target Cyp51A protein, tandem repeat sequence insertions at the cyp51A promoter, and overexpression of the ABC transporter Cdr1B. Environmental azole-resistant strains harboring the association of a tandem repeat sequence and punctual mutation of the Cyp51A gene (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A) have become widely disseminated across the world within a short time period. The epidemiological data also suggests that the number of Aspergillus spp. other than A. fumigatus isolated has risen. Some non-fumigatus species intrinsically show low susceptibility to azole drugs, imposing the need for accurate identification, and drug susceptibility testing in most clinical cases. Currently, our knowledge of azole resistance mechanisms in non-fumigatus Aspergillus species such as A. flavus, A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. terreus, A. fischeri, A. lentulus, A. udagawae, and A. calidoustus is limited. In this review, we present recent advances in our understanding of azole resistance mechanisms particularly in A. fumigatus. We then provide an overview of the genome sequences of non-fumigatus species, focusing on the proteins related to azole resistance mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A. flavus; A. niger; Aspergillus fumigatus; Aspergillus section Fumigati; Cdr1B; Cyp51A; azole resistance; tandem repeats

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708619      PMCID: PMC5030247          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The incidence of fungal infection has increased over the past three decades (Denning, 1998; Dasbach et al., 2000; Kousha et al., 2011; Suzuki et al., 2013; Bitar et al., 2014). This is largely due to the increased number of patients at risk who have received hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. Although new antifungals have been developed, fungal infections remain a threat to human health. Among filamentous fungal infections, those caused by Aspergillus species are the most common. The mortality and morbidity associated with such infections are relatively high, and the predominant causal agent is Aspergillus fumigatus (Steinbach et al., 2012). Accordingly, this fungus is regarded as a model pathogen to study many aspects of aspergillosis, such as fungal virulence factors, immune responses, pathology, and drug efficacy. The genome sequence of A. fumigatus was determined in 2005 (Nierman et al., 2005), which accelerated our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathogenicity (Kwon-Chung and Sugui, 2013; Perez-Nadales et al., 2014; Brown and Goldman, 2016). However, there is still much to be elucidated and the issue of drug resistance has only emerged during the past decade. The antifungal drugs currently available for the treatment of aspergillosis fall into four categories: pyrimidine, echinocandin, polyene, and azole drugs. Among these, azoles are the first choice drugs in the management and prophylaxis of aspergillosis. Since the first report of an azole-resistant A. fumigatus strain in 1997 (Denning et al., 1997), resistant isolates have been detected with increasing incidence worldwide (Chen et al., 2005; Verweij et al., 2007; Howard et al., 2009; van der Linden et al., 2015). It is now widely accepted that azole resistance can develop upon prolonged exposure to azoles at a sub-lethal concentration during the therapy of patients with aspergillosis (particularly with chronic aspergillosis), which is supported by the findings of several studies (Howard et al., 2009; Tashiro et al., 2012; Hagiwara et al., 2014). In addition, environmentally-derived resistance mutations have emerged as a major cause of resistance among strains over the last decade (Snelders et al., 2008; Chowdhary et al., 2013). These mutations involve a combination of tandem repeats (TR) in the cyp51A promoter region and amino acid substitution(s) (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A). The strains harboring such resistance mutations were prevalent among both clinical and environmental settings. As azole resistance is correlated with aspergillosis treatment failure (Howard et al., 2009), a number of studies have focused on the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and diagnostic methods relating to this type of resistance. Another emerging issue in the pathology of aspergillosis is that non-fumigatus species are being increasingly identified as causal agents of invasive aspergillosis; these include A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus, and A. calidoustus as well as other Aspergillus species that belong to Aspergillus section Fumigati (Baddley et al., 2009; Balajee et al., 2009; Krishnan et al., 2009; Tashiro et al., 2011). These species show variable drug susceptibility profiles, imposing the need for clinicians to perform accurate identification and drug susceptibility testing of isolates. Conventional culture methods do not provide an adequate level of specificity and/or sensitivity for accurate diagnosis, making species identification and determination of azole-resistance mutations in the cultured isolates a major challenge. The lack of accurate diagnostic techniques also affects management of patients with aspergillosis caused by azole-resistant Aspergillus (Verweij et al., 2015). Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology have yielded several genomes of Aspergillus pathogens and the subsequent detection of sequence variations associated with azole resistance mechanisms. Taken together with epidemiological data, genomic approaches are increasing our understanding of emerging issues in Aspergillus pathogenesis. This review aims to summarize the recent findings on azole resistance in A. fumigatus, as well as in other related Aspergillus pathogens.

How widely has azole-resistant Aspergillus fungi spread?

Epidemiology of clinically isolated Aspergillus fungi

The genus Aspergillus comprises 344 species (Samson et al., 2014), and several species have been reported to be pathogenic in humans and animals. It is clear from epidemiological data that A. fumigatus is the predominant etiological agent isolated from immune-compromised patients. The second leading cause of aspergillosis is reportedly either A. flavus or A. niger. Due to the different sources of isolation (country, region, hospital, or ward), and the different clinical manifestations, comparing the frequencies of isolation among different studies is difficult. However, to gain a generalized overview or a trend of the incidence rates, epidemiological data collected from multicenter studies are valuable. Recently, epidemiology data for invasive aspergillosis (IA) was reported, which included a total of 563 patients from 30 intensive care units (ICUs) in eight countries (Taccone et al., 2015). In this study, A. fumigatus was the most commonly isolated fungus (n = 512, 92%), followed by A. flavus (n = 19, 3%) and A. niger (n = 7, 1%). In a 1-year (April 2011 to April 2012) prospective multicenter (18 Belgian hospitals) cohort study, 192 isolates of the A. fumigatus complex (87.3%), 13 of the A. flavus complex (5.9%), and 10 of the A. niger complex (4.5%) were isolated (Vermeulen et al., 2015). In another study of 29 Spanish hospitals (two periods; October 2010 and May 2011), among 278 Aspergillus isolates, 156 were identified as A. fumigatus (56.1%), 27 were A. flavus (9.7%), 26 were A. terreus (9.4%), 22 were A. tubingensis (7.9%), and 21 were A. niger (7.6%; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013). Prospective cohort studies of transplant-associated fungal infections in the United States carried out by the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) have also revealed that A. fumigatus is the leading cause of aspergillosis, followed by A. flavus, A. niger, and A. terreus (Kontoyiannis et al., 2010; Pappas et al., 2010). Analyzing these data collectively, it is clear that A. fumigatus is the predominant causative agent of aspergillosis, but several non-fumigatus species were also isolated from patients. Recently, cryptic species of Aspergilli have received much attention owing to advances in the molecular tools for identification. Species that cannot be morphologically distinguished from the leading pathogen of their section are defined as “cryptic” species. Aspergillus section Nigri, whose members are known as the black aspergilli, is represented by A. niger, and includes more than 15 species, including A. tubingensis (Abarca et al., 2004). Within the section Nigri, A. niger, and A. tubingensis are the most common etiological agents of otomycosis, onchomycosis, pulmonary aspergillosis, and aspergilloma (Pappas et al., 2010; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2014; Gheith et al., 2014a; Gautier et al., 2016). Aspergillus section Fumigati, comprising more than 60 species, also has important clinical implications, with 15 of its species having been reported to be isolated in clinical specimens (Alcazar-Fuoli et al., 2008a; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2014; Lamoth, 2016). Misidentification within the section Fumigati has been increasingly reported, with A. lentulus, A. viridinutans, A. fumigatiaffinis, A. fumisynnematus, A. pseudofischeri, A. hiratsukae, and A. udagawae frequently being reported as A. fumigatus (Balajee et al., 2005a,b, 2006; Howard, 2014). Indeed, recent reports demonstrated that the cryptic species including A. lentulus and A. udagawae accounted for 3–6% of the collection of Aspergillus section Fumigati isolates (Balajee et al., 2009; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013; Escribano et al., 2013). These cryptic species in section Nigri and section Fumigati sometimes show different drug susceptibility profiles and different levels of pathogenicity from those of A. fumigatus (Vinh et al., 2009; Coelho et al., 2011; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2014). Regarding azole resistance, Aspergillus calidoustus, belonging to section Usti, should be noted, as it shows intrinsic pan-azole resistance. Prior to A. calidoustus being identified by specific sequencing as the only pathogenic species in this section, it was often reported as Aspergillus ustus (Varga et al., 2008). The incidence of infection caused by A. calidoustus was increased in transplant patients under azole prophylaxis (Egli et al., 2012). The TRANSNET study showed that A. calidoustus accounted for 2.7% (6/218) of Aspergillus species isolates (Balajee et al., 2009), while a population-based survey performed in Spain found 1.4% of the 278 Aspergillus species isolates were A. calidoustus (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013). According to these studies, some of these intrinsically azole-resistant A. calidoustus strains emerged in the setting of invasive aspergillosis. The growing recognition of azole-resistant cryptic species highlights the clinical need for full and accurate identification and susceptibility testing. In parallel, more focused studies are required to develop a better understanding of these species in the future.

Prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus species

The predominant pathogen among Aspergillus species, A. fumigatus, is intrinsically susceptible to medical azoles. The epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for three triazoles, determined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution (CLSI BMD) methods, have been proposed by Pfaller et al. (2009): itraconazole (1 mg/L), voriconazole (1 mg/L), and posaconazole (0.25 mg/L). They showed that 0.2, 0.2, and 0.8% of isolates in a large collection of Aspergillus species (n = 637) had itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) above the ECVs. In a subsequent study (n = 1647–2778) by Espinel-Ingroff et al. (2010), the ECVs for A. fumigatus were determined by CLSI method as itraconazole (1 mg/L), voriconazole (1 mg/L), and posaconazole (0.5 mg/L). By these criteria, the rates of isolates with itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole MICs outside of the ECVs were 2.6, 3.1, and 2.2%, respectively. The sample size and regional differences in the collections might affect the prevalence of azole-resistant isolates. This study also proposed the ECVs (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) for other Aspergillus species including A. flavus (1, 1, and 0.25 mg/L), A. terreus (1, 1, and 0.5 mg/L), A. niger (2, 2, and 0.5 mg/L), and A. nidulans (1, 2, and 1 mg/L; Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010). These ECV data could help to characterize Aspergillus isolates and to monitor the emergence of azole-resistant strains by in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing with CLSI BMD method. Over the past decade, ongoing azole resistance surveillance reports have been published by several research groups from different countries. A summary of recent reports on the surveillance of major Aspergillus species is shown in Table 1. The prevalence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus and A. terreus strains appears to be largely consistent between the studies. Based on the ECVs determined in the study by Espinel-Ingroff et al. (2010), the prevalence rates for azole-resistant isolates determined using the CLSI method in these studies are listed in Table 2. In these studies, 0.2–2.6, 0.8–3.1, and 0.2–2.2% of A. fumigatus isolates were resistant to itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively, while 0, 0–3.0, and 0–0.3% of A. terreus isolates were resistant to itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively (Table 2). It is notable that A. flavus, A. niger, and A. tubingensis showed variations in the prevalence of azole resistance between the studies. In particular, high rates of resistance to itraconazole were demonstrated amongst A. niger strains, suggesting intrinsic resistance to itraconazole in this species. However, this remains controversial as the effects of regional and individual laboratory conditional differences between the studies cannot be ruled out. Thus, further studies are necessary to draw definite conclusions.
Table 1

Summary of recent reports on azole-resistant .

ReferencesMethodSpeciesnITCZVRCZPSCZ
MIC90RangeMIC90RangeMIC90Range
Pfaller et al., 2008CLSI M38-A2A. fumigatus55310.12–20.50.06–40.50.03–2
A. flavus7610.12–210.06–10.50.06–2
A. niger59>80.5–>810.12–210.12–2
A. terreus350.50.12–10.50.06–10.250.06–0.5
Baddley et al., 2009CLSI M38-A2A. fumigatus1810.50.125–40.50.125–80.1250.03–1
A. niger2810.25–110.5–10.250.06–0.5
A. flavus270.250.06–0.250.50.125–10.1250.06–0.125
A. terreus220.250.03–0.250.50.25–0.50.060.03–0.06
Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010CLSI M38-A2A. fumigatus1684–281510.03–1610.03–160.25<–0.01–4
A. flavus323–5920.50.03–1610.06–160.250.03–16
A. niger366–52020.03–1620.03–320.50.03–2
A. terreus330–46210.03–110.03–320.50.03–2
A. nidulans131–14310.03–810.03–810.03–8
Shivaprakash et al., 2011CLSI M38-A2A. flavus*11880.250.062–0.520.5–40.250.062–0.25
Al-Wathiqi et al., 2013E-testA. flavus920.250.064–0.250.250.016–0.38
Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013EUCASTA. fumigatus1560.250.12–110.12–210.25–1
A. flavus2710.06–110.12–420.25–4
A. terreus260.250.06–0.2520.5–210.25–2
A. tubingensis2210.03–3220.25–220.25–2
A. niger210.50.06–110.25–220.25–2
Gheith et al., 2014bE-testA. flavus180.830.25–10.250.06–0.50.250.06–0.25
A. niger1720.38–20.130.05–0.120.250.05–0.25
A. tubingensis94.80.25–80.380.064–0.380.250.047–0.25
Lalitha et al., 2014CLSI M38-A2A. flavus3220.25–8
A. fumigatus101.30.25–4
van Ingen et al., 2015EUCASTA. fumigatus952>160.063–>16>160.25–>1610.031–>16
Gautier et al., 2016E-testA. niger36120.25–240.50.064–10.50.047–1
A. tubingensis36320.38–320.750.125–10.50.047–0.75
Badali et al., 2016CLSI M38-A2A. niger (clinical)39>160.25–>16>160.125–>160.1250.016–0.125
A. niger (environmental)33>160.125–>16>160.125–>160.1250.016–0.25
A. tubingensis (clinical)2010.25–110.063–10.1250.016–0.125
A. tubingensis (environmental)29>160.125–>1610.125-20.1250.016–0.125
Khodavaisy et al., 2016CLSI M38-A2A. flavus (clinical)1710.50.031–20.50.031–80.250.008–0.5
A. flavus (environmental)2810.25–110.25–40.1250.047–0.5
Kachuei et al., 2016CLSI M38-A2A. flavus380.50.063–210.031–10.1250.008–0.25
Castanheira et al., 2016CLSI M38-A2A. fumigatus14210.25–40.50.12–20.50.06–1

Contains clinical and environmental isolates.

ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole.

Table 2

Summary of the rates of azole resistance amongst .

SpeciesnCountryMethod>ECV (%)*1References
ITCZVRCZPSCZ
A. fumigatus637WorldwideCLSI M38-A21/637 (0.2)5/637 (0.8)1/637 (0.2)Pfaller et al., 2009
1684–2815WorldwideCLSI M38-A268/2554 (2.6)88/2778 (3.1)37/1647 (2.2)Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010
A. flavus76WorldwideCLSI M38-A21/76 (1.3)0/76 (0)57/76 (25)Pfaller et al., 2008
27The United StatesCLSI M38-A20/27 (0)0/27 (0)0/27 (0)Baddley et al., 2009
323–592WorldwideCLSI M38-A24/536 (0.7)12/590 (2.0)18/321 (5.6)Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010
188India and The NetherlandsCLSI M38-A20/188 (0)49/188 (26.1)0/188 (0)Shivaprakash et al., 2011
171Iran (clinical)CLSI M38-A21/171 (0.6)1/171 (0.6)4/171 (2.4)Khodavaisy et al., 2016
28Iran (environmental)CLSI M38-A21/28 (3.6)1/28 (3.6)1/28 (3.6)Khodavaisy et al., 2016
A. niger59WorldwideCLSI M38-A214/59 (23.7)0/59 (0)9/59 (15.3)Pfaller et al., 2008
28The United StatesCLSI M38-A20/28 (0)0/28 (0)0/28 (0)Baddley et al., 2009
366–520WorldwideCLSI M38-A241/427 (8.8)5/479 (1.0)19/325 (5.2)Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010
39Iran (clinical)CLSI M38-A27/39 (17.9)6/39 (15.4)0/39 (0)Badali et al., 2016
33Iran (environmental)CLSI M38-A214/33 (42.4)11/33 (33.3)0/33 (0)Badali et al., 2016
A. terreus35WorldwideCLSI M38-A20/35 (0)0/35 (0)0/35 (0)Pfaller et al., 2008
22The United StatesCLSI M38-A20/22 (0)0/22 (0)0/22 (0)Baddley et al., 2009
330–462WorldwideCLSI M38-A20/369 (0)14/462 (3.0)1/330 (0.3)Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010
A. tubingensis*220Iran (clinical)CLSI M38-A20/20 (0)0/20 (0)0/20 (0)Badali et al., 2016
29Iran (environmental)CLSI M38-A211/29 (37.9)0/29 (0)0/29 (0)Badali et al., 2016
A. nidulans131–143WorldwideCLSI M38-A29/141 (6.3)2/139 (1.4)3/129 (2.3)Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2010

ECV, epidemiological cutoff values; ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole.

: ECVs proposed by Espinel-Ingroff et al. (.

: ECVs for A. niger were applied as ECVs have not been established for A. tubingensis.

Summary of recent reports on azole-resistant . Contains clinical and environmental isolates. ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole. Summary of the rates of azole resistance amongst . ECV, epidemiological cutoff values; ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole. : ECVs proposed by Espinel-Ingroff et al. (. : ECVs for A. niger were applied as ECVs have not been established for A. tubingensis. In addition to the non-fumigatus species, the MICs for azoles were determined in some species of Aspergillus section Fumigati (Table 3). Isolates of A. lentulus, A. udagawae, and A. viridinutans with high MICs (>1 mg/L) for itraconazole and/or voriconazole were detected in most of these studies. Although these data were suggestive of intrinsic resistance to the azoles in these species, it should not be overlooked that the susceptibilities were variable among isolates. It is particularly noteworthy that posaconazole appears to retain remarkable antifungal activity against these cryptic species, and that novel azole drug isavuconazole also shows significant activity in these species (Datta et al., 2013).
Table 3

Summary of the MICs for .

ReferencesSpeciesnITCZVRCZPSCZ
MIC90RangeMIC90RangeMIC90Range
Tamiya et al., 2015A. fumigatus690.51
A. lentulus828
A. udagawae988
Datta et al., 2013A. lentulus1520.5–220.5–2
N. udagawae1010.25–110.25–1
Escribano et al., 2013A. lentulus61–21–40.5–1
N. udagawae2110.5
A. viridinutans1440.5
Vinh et al., 2009N. udagawae41–41–1160.25–0.5
Gürcan et al., 2013A. lentulus10.250.125
Lago et al., 2014(A. lentulus)*1712–40.125–0.25
(A. fumigatus)*180.25–10.25–0.50.031–0.25
Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2014A. lentulus26160.12–1680.25–160.50.03–1
A. udagawae510.25–142–40.250.12–0.25
Mortensen et al., 2011A. fumigatus1071<–0.03–>40.50.125–20.25<–0.03–>4
A. lentulus1220.5
Balajee et al., 2009A. lentulus40.25–0.51–40.25
A. udagawae30.25–20.25–20.125–0.25
Alcazar-Fuoli et al., 2008aA. lentulus14(0.43–16)*2(3–7.5)*2(0.12–2)*2
A. viridinutans2(14.4–16)*2(4)*2(0.25–0.41)*2

: isolated from the environment.

: Geometric means (GMs) were used.

ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole.

Summary of the MICs for . : isolated from the environment. : Geometric means (GMs) were used. ITCZ, itraconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole. Many surveys focused particularly on A. fumigatus have been conducted, as azole resistance mechanisms have been intensively investigated in this fungus. An overview of the prevalence of azole-resistant strains was presented in two excellent reviews both published in 2013 (Lelièvre et al., 2013; Vermeulen et al., 2013). The literature cited in the review by Vermeulen et al. (2013) revealed that the overall azole resistance rate of A. fumigatus ranged from 0.6 to 27.8% across the studies. Again the prevalence rates varied between studies (countries), likely due to differences in region and disease manifestation in patients. The emergence and spread of “environmental resistance mechanisms” during the past decade might also have affected the prevalence data. Accordingly, a research group from the Netherlands most recently published a survey of azole-resistant A. fumigatus, in which 364 of 952 clinical strains (38.2%) isolated by, or referred to, the laboratory from 2010 to 2013 were resistant to azoles (van Ingen et al., 2015). Among them, 225 (23.6%) and 98 (10.3%) strains possessed the environmental resistance mechanisms TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A, respectively. Another group from the Netherlands reported that 21 azole-resistant strains (20.0%) out of 105 isolates included 13 strains harboring the TR34/L98H allele (12.4%) and three strains harboring the TR46/Y121F/T289A allele (2.9%; Fuhren et al., 2015). The isolation rate of environmentally-derived azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains seems to be constantly increasing, threatening the effectiveness of current frontline antifungal therapy against aspergillosis. A multicenter epidemiological study carried out by the Surveillance Collaboration on Aspergillus Resistance in Europe (SCARE) network provided a more general understanding of the prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus strains (van der Linden et al., 2015). In total, 22 centers from 19 countries participated the study, and 3788 Aspergillus isolates were collected between January 2009 and January 2011. Of these, 2941 isolates (77.6%) belonged to the A. fumigatus complex, 60 of which showed azole resistance. Forty-seven of these azole-resistant isolates were A. fumigatus sensu stricto, and strains with environmental resistance mechanisms TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A accounted for 55.3% (n = 26) of isolates. These strains were recovered from six countries: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, and The Netherlands. Recently, strains containing the TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations have also been identified in the United States, Columbia, Taiwan, and Japan (Wu et al., 2015; Hagiwara et al., 2016; Le Pape et al., 2016; Wiederhold et al., 2016). These reports highlight a global risk for resistant A. fumigatus strains.

Azole resistance mechanisms in A. fumigatus

The basic resistance mechanisms of microbial cells to growth-inhibiting drugs are depicted in Figure 1. The mechanisms are categorized as: (1) reduced interaction affinity of the target protein to the drugs, (2) overexpression of the target protein in the cells, (3) decreased drug concentration by boosted efflux system, (4) intra- or extra-cellular degradation of the drugs, and (5) alternative pathways bypassing the drug effects. The following section summarizes recent advances in our understanding of each of these resistance mechanisms, particularly in regard to A. fumigatus. Furthermore, we review several attempts to reproduce the resistance mutations under laboratory conditions, and new approaches to identifying the responsible mutations by genome comparison.
Figure 1

Basic drug resistance mechanisms and the corresponding azole resistance mechanisms in . Drug resistance mechanisms are categorized into five basic types. The underlying molecular mechanisms identified in A. fumigatus are shown in red text.

Basic drug resistance mechanisms and the corresponding azole resistance mechanisms in . Drug resistance mechanisms are categorized into five basic types. The underlying molecular mechanisms identified in A. fumigatus are shown in red text.

CYP51 proteins

The main mechanisms of azole resistance were elucidated based on the identification of numerous mutations in resistant A. fumigatus isolates. The most frequent mutations detected were related to the target protein Cyp51A: 14α-demethylase. This enzyme is involved in ergosterol biosynthesis and sterol metabolism, and plays an important role in Aspergillus. A. fumigatus has a paralogous protein Cyp51B. Both proteins are capable of complementing the lethality of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae erg11/cyp51 (sterol 14α-demethylase) mutant (Martel et al., 2010), indicating the functionality of the Cyp51 proteins. Neither Cyp51A nor Cyp51B is individually essential for A. fumigatus growth (Garcia-Effron et al., 2005; Mellado et al., 2005), but the attempted inactivation of both genes was lethal (Hu et al., 2007). Azoles interact with and inhibit the Cyp51 proteins (Warrilow et al., 2015), which in turn reduce the ergosterol content and impair sterol metabolism in the cells (Alcazar-Fuoli et al., 2008b), resulting in a fungistatic (under low azole concentrations), or a fungicidal (under high azole concentrations) effect. Single amino acid substitutions at G54, P216, F219, M220, and G448 in the Cyp51A protein have been well-described to confer azole resistance (Mann et al., 2003; Mellado et al., 2004; Camps S. M. et al., 2012; Krishnan-Natesan et al., 2012; Figure 2A). Besides these “hotspots,” amino acid changes at other positions (Y121, G138, and Y431) were also found in the Cyp51A protein of resistant strains (Albarrag et al., 2011; Lescar et al., 2014). These resistance mutations tend to arise during prolonged treatment of chronic aspergillosis with azole drugs. This was well-exemplified by several cases, in which azole-susceptible and azole-resistant isolates were serially isolated from one individual patient (Howard et al., 2009; Hagiwara et al., 2014). It is worth noting that such resistance mutations have never been reported to date in the Cyp51B protein. Instead, high-level induced expression and constitutive overexpression of the cyp51B gene were observed in azole-resistant clinical isolates (Buied et al., 2013). Although these findings await further genetic verification, they raise the possibility of the involvement of Cyp51B in azole resistance as a non-Cyp51A-mediated resistance mechanism in clinical settings.
Figure 2

Known azole resistance mechanisms in . (A) Amino acid substitutions responsible for azole resistance. G54, P216, F219, M220, and G448 show the position at which amino acid changes resulted in azole resistance. The MICs of the strains harboring the change (to the indicated amino acid) are shown in parentheses (Mann et al., 2003; Mellado et al., 2004; Camps S. M. et al., 2012; Krishnan-Natesan et al., 2012). (B) The efflux transporters related to azole resistance. The MIC of the strain with overexpression of the cdr1B gene is shown in parentheses (Fraczek et al., 2013). (C) The tandem repeat sequences in a cyp51A promoter. The none-overlapping bases are shown in italics. The MICs of the strains harboring TR34 or TR46 and/or amino acid change(s) are shown in parentheses (Snelders et al., 2011, 2015). ITCZ, itraconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole.

Known azole resistance mechanisms in . (A) Amino acid substitutions responsible for azole resistance. G54, P216, F219, M220, and G448 show the position at which amino acid changes resulted in azole resistance. The MICs of the strains harboring the change (to the indicated amino acid) are shown in parentheses (Mann et al., 2003; Mellado et al., 2004; Camps S. M. et al., 2012; Krishnan-Natesan et al., 2012). (B) The efflux transporters related to azole resistance. The MIC of the strain with overexpression of the cdr1B gene is shown in parentheses (Fraczek et al., 2013). (C) The tandem repeat sequences in a cyp51A promoter. The none-overlapping bases are shown in italics. The MICs of the strains harboring TR34 or TR46 and/or amino acid change(s) are shown in parentheses (Snelders et al., 2011, 2015). ITCZ, itraconazole; PSCZ, posaconazole; VRCZ, voriconazole.

Efflux transporters

The overexpression of efflux transporters has been well-documented in yeasts. A. fumigatus contains at least 49 genes encoding the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (Lelièvre et al., 2013), among which 12 genes show high homology (>30% identities and >50% positive results for >80% of the query protein sequences) with the S. cerevisiae PDR5 and PDR15 proteins that are involved in azole resistance (Paul and Moye-Rowley, 2014). These 12 transporters are included in a PDR (also called an ABC-G) sub-class of ABC transporters. Among them, Cdr1B was identified to be overexpressed in azole-resistant strains, and deleting the cdr1B gene in one such strain resulted in increased susceptibility to itraconazole (Fraczek et al., 2013; Figure 2B). The other strains with the cdr1B gene deleted showed azole hyper-sensitivity (Paul et al., 2013), which indicated that Cdr1B is responsible for azole resistance in A. fumigatus. Recently, Dr. Sanglard and his colleagues demonstrated that deletion mutants of two distinct ABC transporters (AtrF, AtrI) and a major facilitator superfamily transporter (MdrA) also showed sensitivity to azoles (Meneau et al., 2016). The expression levels of the cdr1B gene (also called abcB) were slightly induced upon voriconazole treatment (Paul et al., 2013), whereas some of the other transporter genes (abcB/Afu1g10390, abcE, mfsA, mfsB, and mfsC) were shown to be upregulated in response to voriconazole (da Silva Ferreira et al., 2006). It therefore appears that other efflux transporters may potentially be involved in clinical azole resistance.

Environmentally-derived resistance mechanisms

During this decade, A. fumigatus azole-resistant strains with a combination of a TR in the promoter region of cyp51A and amino acid mutation(s) (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A) have been increasingly reported. These strains have been isolated from patients regardless of their azole treatment history, as well as from the environment. The strains harboring such mutations were isolated in many countries from several continents (Mellado et al., 2007; Snelders et al., 2008; Vermeulen et al., 2012; Chowdhary et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2015; Hagiwara et al., 2016; Wiederhold et al., 2016). The high incidence of resistant strains reported in the Netherlands is particularly alarming (Fuhren et al., 2015; van Ingen et al., 2015). It is now widely accepted that such resistance mechanisms were derived from exposure to azole fungicides in the environment (Snelders et al., 2008). The molecular mechanisms underlying environmentally-derived mutations were intensively studied by Dr. Melchers's group (Figure 2C). A. fumigatus recombinants with different cyp51A amino acid substitutions and/or a promoter insertion were constructed (Snelders et al., 2011, 2015). The recombinants harboring TR34 or TR46 showed increased expression of the cyp51A gene compared with the parental strains, however, the TR by itself only had a moderate effect on azole susceptibility (itraconazole (ITCZ) MIC: 0.25–0.5 to 0.5–1 mg/L; voriconazole (VRCZ) MIC: 0.25–0.5 to 1–2 mg/L). Site-directed mutagenesis of L98H or Y121F alone also showed a moderate increase in the MICs (ITCZ MIC: 0.25–0.5 to 0.5–1 mg/L; VRCZ MIC: 0.25–0.5 to 1–4 mg/L). Azole resistance levels comparable to those of the clinical isolates (TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A) were achieved by a combination of the TR and an amino acid substitution; the recombinant with TR34/L98H showed MICs >16 mg/L for ITCZ and 2 mg/L for VRCZ, and the recombinant with TR46/Y121F showed MICs >8 mg/L for ITCZ and >8 mg/L for VRCZ. Interestingly, the results suggested that T289A was dispensable for full resistance to azoles. Paul et al. (2012) also evaluated the effect of the TR34 element on cyp51A gene expression using a promoter-luciferase reporter system. The lack of the 34-bp sequence led to a 90% reduction in the expression level compared with the wild-type promoter, indicating that the 34-bp element played a critical role in maintaining wild-type expression of the cyp51A gene. Although repeats of the 34-bp element resulted in a modest increase in expression, the sequence may function as an enhancer element for cyp51A gene expression. Several reports of similar Cyp51 overexpression were also found in plant fungal pathogens (Becher and Wirsel, 2012). The high expression was correlated with the presence of insertions in the promoter region of the cyp51 gene. A five-time TR of a unique 126-bp sequence was found in the cyp51A promoter region in Penicillium digitatum (Hamamoto et al., 2000). Furthermore, 553-, 120-, and 65-bp insertions were found in the cyp51 promoter region in Venturia inaequalis, Mycosphaerella graminicola, and Monilinia fructicola, respectively (Schnabel and Jones, 2000; Luo and Schnabel, 2008; Cools et al., 2012). Changes in the promoter region of the cyp51 gene by the presence of insertions or TRs may frequently occur under certain conditions such as long-term exposure to azole fungicides in environmental niches.

Lessons from in vitro evolution and perspectives

To broaden our knowledge of azole resistance mutations, attempts to evolve drug-resistant A. fumigatus strains in vitro by transferring strains onto plates containing sub-lethal concentration of azoles have been undertaken by several groups. da Silva Ferreira et al. (2004) generated 10 itraconazole-resistant strains (nine showed >16 mg/L of ITCZ MIC and one showed 1 mg/L) by in vitro evolution procedure, three of these possessed a G54R point mutation in the Cyp51A protein, and two possessed a M220I point mutation in this protein. Novel mutations (positions N22, T440, and Y491) were also found in the Cyp51A protein of itraconazole-resistant strains, among which the N22D substitution was shown to confer itraconazole resistance to wild-type A. fumgiatus by genetic transformation. They also demonstrated that these resistant mutants tended to show increased expression levels of efflux transporter genes. Upon voriconazole exposure in another study, six resistant strains were obtained from three different parental strains under laboratory conditions (Krishnan-Natesan et al., 2012). All of these strains harbored a G448S mutation in the Cyp51A protein and showed MICs of 2–8 mg/L for VRCZ, whereas the ITCZ MIC ranged from 0.25 to 2 mg/L and the PSCZ MIC from 0.0625 to 0.15 mg/L. This suggested that G448S is the predominant mutation conferring resistance to voriconazole. Snelders et al. (2012) exposed distinct A. fumigatus strains (wild-type, the strain with TR34, and the strain with L98H) to itraconazole, azole fungicides (bromuconazole, difenoconazole, epoxiconazole, propiconazole, or tebuconazole), or a mixture of the fungicides. In the case of itraconazole exposure, G138C and P216L were identified in the wild-type strain that had evolved by more than three transfers. However, none of the strains gained “environmentally-derived mutations” such as TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A. The authors hypothesized that the development of TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations might be extremely infrequent in the environment. Recent microsatellite genotyping studies showed that less genetic variation was found among strains harboring TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations compared with the set of wild-type isolates (Snelders et al., 2009; Hagiwara et al., 2016). From these studies, it is tempting to speculate that the TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A-containing isolates did not arise in distinct strains in various regions, but might have originated from common ancestors. If this is the case, the rapid spread of these resistant strains across the globe in a short period of time is quite surprising and worrisome. At this moment, however, the possibility that there is a preferential genetic background in which “environmental mutations” occur more frequently cannot be ruled out. More extensive studies, potentially including population genetic analyses, might provide insight into this important issue.

Exploring resistance mutations by whole-genome comparisons

As stated earlier, azole resistance mutations tend to occur during long-term azole treatment (Tashiro et al., 2012). In some cases, multiple strains are serially isolated from one patient at different time points. Resistant isolates theoretically possess the mutation attributed to resistance, which does not exist in the corresponding sensitive isolates. Inspection of the cyp51A gene sequence between these isolates has uncovered several mutations in the Cyp51A protein. Furthermore, to identify novel non-cyp51A resistance mutations, whole-genome comparisons were conducted between azole-sensitive and azole-resistant cognate isolates. Camps S. M. T. et al. (2012) identified a new mutation in the hapE gene by whole-genome comparison and verified its involvement by sexual crossing. HapE encodes a subunit of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor complex, which plays a regulatory role in a wide array of fungal phenotypes. The cyp51A expression level in strains with the hapE mutation was higher than in the corresponding wild-type strain, which suggested that HapE plays a role in regulating cyp51A gene expression. As a presumed CCAAT-box is present in the promoter region of cyp51A, further analysis may uncover the mechanism of regulation of the cyp51A gene. In addition to this novel resistance mutation, they also detected at least 22 mutations in a pair of strains that were recovered 17 weeks apart. Among them, five of these mutations appeared to be in non-coding regions and 11 were synonymous mutations. This indicated that dynamic alterations, likely irrespective of azole resistance, occur in the A. fumigatus genome within its host during infection and treatment. In another study, a large genomic deletion in a region containing 11 genes was identified by whole-genome comparison (Hagiwara et al., 2014). Accordingly, whole-genome comparison analysis can provide interesting insight into genetic variation provoked during infection, and is therefore a powerful tool for further understanding genome-scale azole resistance mechanisms.

Frontiers of azole resistance in non-fumigatus Aspergillus species

As is the case with A. fumigatus, acquired antifungal resistance is potentially able to arise in non-fumigatus species, whether in the environment or within a host. However, reports identifying antifungal resistance in such species are so far limited. Genome data for several Aspergillus species are available in databases, and the genomes of the cryptic species A. lentulus and A. udagawae as well as A. calidoustus were recently added (Kusuya et al., 2015, 2016; Horn et al., 2016). Thus, there is an opportunity to study pathogenic Aspergillus genomes with special reference to azole resistance. The characteristics of pathogenic Aspergillus genomes are shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Features of pathogenic .

SpeciesStrainSize (Mb)GC%Protein-coding genesCyp51 genesCdr1B genesReference database
A. fumigatusAf29329.4249.8984021AspGD
A. flavusNRRL 335736.8948.313,48532NCBI
A. nigerCBS 513.8833.9850.414,05822AspGD
A. tubingensisCBS 134.4835.1549.212,32222JGI
A. terreusNIH262429.3652.810,40123NCBI
A. fischeriNRRL 18131.7749.510,39521NCBI
A. lentulusIFM 5470330.9649.5968021NCBI
A. udagawaeIFM 4697332.1949.6999921NCBI
A. calidoustusSF00650441.1051.115,13922NCBI
Features of pathogenic . The sequences of the Cyp51 and Cdr1B proteins of A. flavus, A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. terreus, A. fischeri, A. lentulus, A. udagawae, A. calidoustus as well as A. fumigatus, were retrieved from the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and AspGD (http://www.aspgd.org/) databases and compared. Phylogenetic trees constructed based on the Cyp51 and Cdr1B protein sequences are depicted in Figures 3A,B, respectively. All of the species listed above, except for A. flavus, possess two Cyp51 proteins, Cyp51A and Cyp51B, which form distinct sub-groups in the phylogenetic tree. The third Cyp51 protein, Cyp51C, is found only in A. flavus, and is relatively similar to Cyp51A (Figure 3A). The Y319H mutation in A. flavus Cyp51C was found specifically in an azole-resistant clinical isolate, suggesting a role in the resistance mechanism (Paul et al., 2015). Through an in vitro evolution experiment, several mutations in Cyp51A (K197N, D282E, M288L, Y132N, and T469S) and Cyp51B (H399P, D411N, T454P, and T486P) were identified in multi-azole-resistant A. flavus, which warranted further study (Krishnan-Natesan et al., 2008). It is interesting to note that intrinsically azole-resistant species A. calidoustus has two Cyp51 proteins. One of these, a Cyp51A-like protein, shows relatively distant homology to A. fumigatus Cyp51A, whereas the other falls into the Cyp51B group (Figure 3A). When the A. calidoustus Cyp51A-like protein was aligned with Cyp51A proteins from other Aspergillus species, the methionine at position 220 in A. fumigatus Cyp51A was replaced with a valine in A. calidoustus Cyp51A (Figure 3C). As M220 in the A. fumigatus Cyp51A protein is involved in azole resistance, this replacement may cause the observed insensitivity to azole drugs in this fungus. It is yet to be confirmed whether the varied azole susceptibility among species is indeed derived from the sequence difference in the Cyp51A protein. Regarding the protein sequences of Cyp51A and Cyp51B in A. lentulus, differences of 16 and 12 amino acids, respectively, were detected compared with the corresponding sequences in A. fumigatus. Mellado et al. showed that heterologous expression of the A. lentulus cyp51A gene in the A. fumigatus cyp51A deletion mutant resulted in an A. lentulus level azole-resistant phenotype (Mellado et al., 2011). This elegantly demonstrated that Cyp51A is responsible for the differences in azole resistance between A. fumgiatus and A. lentulus.
Figure 3

The molecular genetic phylogenetic trees of the Cyp51A and Cdr1B proteins of pathogenic . The sequences were retrieved from the AspGD and NCBI databases according to sequence similarity. The protein sequences of Cyp51A (A) and Cdr1B (B) were aligned using the ClustalW software, and the phylogenetic trees were constructed by the UPGMA method. The trees were drawn using FigTree v1.4.2 software. The IDs shown behind a species name are associated with the database from which the sequences were retrieved. (C) Amino acid sequence alignment of Cyp51A. The sequence surrounding the azole resistance-related amino acids (G54, P216, M220, and G448) is depicted. The numbers indicate amino acid position in the A. fumigatus Cyp51A protein.

The molecular genetic phylogenetic trees of the Cyp51A and Cdr1B proteins of pathogenic . The sequences were retrieved from the AspGD and NCBI databases according to sequence similarity. The protein sequences of Cyp51A (A) and Cdr1B (B) were aligned using the ClustalW software, and the phylogenetic trees were constructed by the UPGMA method. The trees were drawn using FigTree v1.4.2 software. The IDs shown behind a species name are associated with the database from which the sequences were retrieved. (C) Amino acid sequence alignment of Cyp51A. The sequence surrounding the azole resistance-related amino acids (G54, P216, M220, and G448) is depicted. The numbers indicate amino acid position in the A. fumigatus Cyp51A protein. As described above, A. fumigatus has 12 ABC transporters in a PDR sub-group that includes the Cdr1B protein. Likewise, according to sequence similarity, A. flavus and A. niger have 13 and 15 PDR-type ABC transporters, respectively (Table 5). The Cdr1B ortholog is duplicated in A. flavus and A. niger. From the genome sequence data, one Cdr1B protein is present in A. fumigatus, A. fischeri, A. lentulus, and A. udagawae, whereas A. flavus, A. niger, A. tubingensis, and A. calidoustus possess two Cdr1B proteins, and A. terreus has three such proteins (Figure 3B). The distribution of Cdr1B proteins therefore varies among Aspergillus species/complexes.
Table 5

List of the PDR-type ABC transporter genes.

A. fumigatusProtein lengthA. flavusProtein lengthA. nigerProtein length
Gene IDGene IDGene ID
Afu1g14330 (cdr1B)1498AFL2T_016891367An01g039001355
Afu1g174401454AFL2T_032361482An01g087201976
Afu2g151301500AFL2T_033201408An01g12380 (cdr1B1)1540
Afu3g014001425AFL2T_035031468An05g01660 (cdr1B2)1496
Afu3g07300 (atrI)1502AFL2T_05157 (cdr1B1)1495An06g025501336
Afu4g010501350AFL2T_057611520An07g012501442
Afu5g007901472AFL2T_076641491An08g033001456
Afu5g022601470AFL2T_07785 (cdr1B2)1499An08g045001474
Afu5g094601476AFL2T_078451445An11g021101490
Afu6g04360 (atrF)1548AFL2T_079841410An13g030601421
Afu6g080201527AFL2T_094801334An13g035701478
Afu8g026501454AFL2T_105931420An14g026101358
AFL2T_114751518An14g035701433
An15g011301536
An15g029301491
List of the PDR-type ABC transporter genes.

Conclusion and perspectives

Recent genetic and genomic studies have provided important insights into azole resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus. In particular, whole-genome comparison has proven to be a powerful tool for discovering novel mutations responsible for drug resistance. The analysis of genome sequences has also advanced our understanding of the important diversity of Aspergilli. However, there remains much to be investigated in A. flavus and A. niger, the second most frequent causative agents of aspergillosis. A comprehensive investigation of the genes related to azole resistance among a large population of clinical isolates would broaden our knowledge. In addition, the variable drug susceptibility within the cryptic species may form an important focus of future studies. A more complete understanding of the mechanisms underlying azole resistance will aid the development of new therapeutic drugs against azole-resistant Aspergillus fungi/strains.

Author contributions

DH, AW, KK, GG: Designed the study. DH: Wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was also supported in part by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Special Budget for Research Project: The Project on Controlling Aspergillosis and the Related Emerging Mycoses. GG thanks for Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), both from Brazil, for providing resources for the research in his laboratory.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  108 in total

1.  Targeted gene disruption of the 14-alpha sterol demethylase (cyp51A) in Aspergillus fumigatus and its role in azole drug susceptibility.

Authors:  E Mellado; G Garcia-Effron; M J Buitrago; L Alcazar-Fuoli; M Cuenca-Estrella; J L Rodriguez-Tudela
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Contributions of Aspergillus fumigatus ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins to drug resistance and virulence.

Authors:  Sanjoy Paul; Daniel Diekema; W Scott Moye-Rowley
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2013-10-11

3.  Role of Aspergillus lentulus 14-α sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) in azole drug susceptibility.

Authors:  Emilia Mellado; Laura Alcazar-Fuoli; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Juan L Rodriguez-Tudela
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Emergence of Aspergillus calidoustus infection in the era of posttransplantation azole prophylaxis.

Authors:  Adrian Egli; Jeff Fuller; Atul Humar; Dale Lien; Justin Weinkauf; Roland Nador; Ali Kapasi; Deepali Kumar
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Fungal cytochrome P450 sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) and azole resistance in plant and human pathogens.

Authors:  Rayko Becher; Stefan G R Wirsel
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  In vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungal isolates from a corneal ulcer clinical trial.

Authors:  Prajna Lalitha; Catherine Q Sun; N Venkatesh Prajna; Rajarathinam Karpagam; Manoharan Geetha; Kieran S O'Brien; Vicky Cevallos; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus resulting in reduced susceptibility to posaconazole appear to be restricted to a single amino acid in the cytochrome P450 14alpha-demethylase.

Authors:  Paul A Mann; Raulo M Parmegiani; Shui-Qing Wei; Cara A Mendrick; Xin Li; David Loebenberg; Beth DiDomenico; Roberta S Hare; Scott S Walker; Paul M McNicholas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Molecular characterisation of cyp51A and cyp51B genes coding for P450 14alpha-lanosterol demethylases A (CYP51Ap) and B (CYP51Bp) from voriconazole-resistant laboratory isolates of Aspergillus flavus.

Authors:  Suganthini Krishnan-Natesan; Pranatharthi H Chandrasekar; George J Alangaden; Elias K Manavathu
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  Essential gene identification and drug target prioritization in Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Wenqi Hu; Susan Sillaots; Sebastien Lemieux; John Davison; Sarah Kauffman; Anouk Breton; Annie Linteau; Chunlin Xin; Joel Bowman; Jeff Becker; Bo Jiang; Terry Roemer
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Frequency and evolution of Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure.

Authors:  Susan J Howard; Dasa Cerar; Michael J Anderson; Ahmed Albarrag; Matthew C Fisher; Alessandro C Pasqualotto; Michel Laverdiere; Maiken C Arendrup; David S Perlin; David W Denning
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  55 in total

1.  Contributions of both ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter and Cyp51A Proteins Are Essential for Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Sanjoy Paul; Daniel Diekema; W Scott Moye-Rowley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-A2 Microdilution Methods in Determining the Activity of Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, and Posaconazole against Aspergillus Species.

Authors:  Hsuan-Chen Wang; Ming-I Hsieh; Pui-Ching Choi; Chi-Jung Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A Simple Method To Detect Point Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A Gene Using a Surveyor Nuclease Assay.

Authors:  Teppei Arai; Hidetaka Majima; Akira Watanabe; Katsuhiko Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Species Identification and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Aspergillus terreus Species Complex Clinical Isolates from a French Multicenter Study.

Authors:  E Dannaoui; F Botterel; S Imbert; A C Normand; S Ranque; J M Costa; J Guitard; I Accoceberry; C Bonnal; A Fekkar; N Bourgeois; S Houzé; C Hennequin; R Piarroux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In Vitro and In Vivo Study on the Synergistic Effect of Minocycline and Azoles against Pathogenic Fungi.

Authors:  Lujuan Gao; Yi Sun; Mingzhu Yuan; Ming Li; Tongxiang Zeng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Species Distribution and Comparison between EUCAST and Gradient Concentration Strips Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of 112 Aspergillus Section Nigri Isolates.

Authors:  B Carrara; R Richards; S Imbert; F Morio; M Sasso; N Zahr; A C Normand; P Le Pape; L Lachaud; S Ranque; D Maubon; R Piarroux; A Fekkar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Azole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus by Tandem Repeat Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification.

Authors:  Ling-Shan Yu; Jesus Rodriguez-Manzano; Kenny Malpartida-Cardenas; Thomas Sewell; Oliver Bader; Darius Armstrong-James; Matthew C Fisher; Pantelis Georgiou
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Toxoflavin Produced by Burkholderia gladioli from Lycoris aurea Is a New Broad-Spectrum Fungicide.

Authors:  Xiaodan Li; Yikui Li; Ren Wang; Qizhi Wang; Ling Lu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Molecular Tools for the Detection and Deduction of Azole Antifungal Drug Resistance Phenotypes in Aspergillus Species.

Authors:  Anna Dudakova; Birgit Spiess; Marut Tangwattanachuleeporn; Christoph Sasse; Dieter Buchheidt; Michael Weig; Uwe Groß; Oliver Bader
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Lysine acetylation as drug target in fungi: an underexplored potential in Aspergillus spp.

Authors:  Natália Sayuri Wassano; Ariely Barbosa Leite; Franqueline Reichert-Lima; Angelica Zaninelli Schreiber; Nilmar S Moretti; André Damasio
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.