Literature DB >> 26034343

How Distinctive Processing Enhances Hits and Reduces False Alarms.

R Reed Hunt1, Rebekah E Smith1.   

Abstract

Distinctive processing is a concept designed to account for precision in memory, both correct responses and avoidance of errors. The principal question addressed in two experiments is how distinctive processing of studied material reduces false alarms to familiar distractors. Jacoby (Jacoby, Kelley, & McElree, 1999) has used the metaphors early selection and late correction to describe two different types of control processes. Early selection refers to limitations on access whereas late correction describes controlled monitoring of accessed information. The two types of processes are not mutually exclusive, and previous research has provided evidence for the operation of both. The data reported here extend previous work to a criterial recollection paradigm and to a recognition memory test. The results of both experiments show that variables that reduce false memory for highly familiar distracters continue to exert their effect under conditions of minimal post-access monitoring. Level of monitoring was reduced in the first experiment through test instructions and in the second experiment through speeded test responding. The results were consistent with the conclusion that both early selection and late correction operate to control accuracy in memory.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26034343      PMCID: PMC4447709          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  22 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.

Authors:  Amanda C G Hege; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson; Amanda C G Hege
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Yujiro Shimizu; Karen A Daniels; Matthew G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  D L Schacter; D L Cendan; C S Dodson; E R Clifford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.

Authors:  J P Toth; E M Reingold; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.