Tiffany P Hennedige1, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan1, Fiona P Leung1,2, Lynette Li San Teo1, Sridhar Iyer3, Gang Wang1,4, Stephen Chang3, Krishna Kumar Madhavan3, Aileen Wee5, Sudhakar K Venkatesh6. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 2. South West Radiology, Liverpool, NSW, Australia. 3. Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 4. University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200, First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. venkatesh.sudhakar@mayo.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant and benign focal liver lesions (FLLs). METHODS: Seventy-nine subjects with 124 FLLs (44 benign and 80 malignant) underwent both MRE and DWI. MRE was performed with a modified gradient-echo sequence and DWI with a free breathing technique (b = 0.500). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and stiffness maps were generated. FLL mean stiffness and ADC values were obtained by placing regions of interest over the FLLs on stiffness and ADC maps. The accuracy of MRE and DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant FLL was compared using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between stiffness and ADC (r = -0.54, p < 0.0001) of FLLs. Malignant FLLs had significantly higher mean stiffness (7.9kPa vs. 3.1kPa, p < 0.001) and lower mean ADC (129 vs. 200 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p < 0.001) than benign FLLs. The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value for differentiating malignant from benign FLLs with MRE (cut-off, >4.54kPa) and DWI (cut-off, <151 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s) were 96.3/95.5/97.5/93.3% (p < 0.001) and 85/81.8/88.3/75% (p < 0.001), respectively. ROC analysis showed significantly higher accuracy for MRE than DWI (0.986 vs. 0.82, p = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: MRE is significantly more accurate than DWI for differentiating benign and malignant FLLs. KEY POINTS: • MRE is superior to DWI for differentiating benign and malignant focal liver lesions. • Benign lesions with large fibrous components may have higher stiffness with MRE. • Cholangiocarcinomas tend to have higher stiffness than hepatocellular carcinomas. • Hepatocellular adenomas tend to have lower stiffness than focal nodular hyperplasia. • MRE is superior to conventional MRI in differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.
OBJECTIVES: Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant and benign focal liver lesions (FLLs). METHODS: Seventy-nine subjects with 124 FLLs (44 benign and 80 malignant) underwent both MRE and DWI. MRE was performed with a modified gradient-echo sequence and DWI with a free breathing technique (b = 0.500). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and stiffness maps were generated. FLL mean stiffness and ADC values were obtained by placing regions of interest over the FLLs on stiffness and ADC maps. The accuracy of MRE and DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant FLL was compared using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between stiffness and ADC (r = -0.54, p < 0.0001) of FLLs. Malignant FLLs had significantly higher mean stiffness (7.9kPa vs. 3.1kPa, p < 0.001) and lower mean ADC (129 vs. 200 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s, p < 0.001) than benign FLLs. The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value for differentiating malignant from benign FLLs with MRE (cut-off, >4.54kPa) and DWI (cut-off, <151 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s) were 96.3/95.5/97.5/93.3% (p < 0.001) and 85/81.8/88.3/75% (p < 0.001), respectively. ROC analysis showed significantly higher accuracy for MRE than DWI (0.986 vs. 0.82, p = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: MRE is significantly more accurate than DWI for differentiating benign and malignant FLLs. KEY POINTS: • MRE is superior to DWI for differentiating benign and malignant focal liver lesions. • Benign lesions with large fibrous components may have higher stiffness with MRE. • Cholangiocarcinomas tend to have higher stiffness than hepatocellular carcinomas. • Hepatocellular adenomas tend to have lower stiffness than focal nodular hyperplasia. • MRE is superior to conventional MRI in differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.
Authors: Shahid M Hussain; Türkan Terkivatan; Pieter E Zondervan; Esmée Lanjouw; Sjoerd de Rave; Jan N M Ijzermans; Rob A de Man Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Frank H Miller; Nancy Hammond; Aheed J Siddiqi; Sagar Shroff; Gaurav Khatri; Yi Wang; Laura B Merrick; Paul Nikolaidis Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Philip A Araoz; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tejas Parikh; Stephen J Drew; Vivian S Lee; Samson Wong; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Jean-Luc Daire; Mathilde Wagner; Helena Leitao; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrea Agostini; Moritz F Kircher; Richard K G Do; Alessandra Borgheresi; Serena Monti; Andrea Giovagnoni; Lorenzo Mannelli Journal: Semin Roentgenol Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 0.800
Authors: Scott M Thompson; Jin Wang; Vishal S Chandan; Kevin J Glaser; Lewis R Roberts; Richard L Ehman; Sudhakar K Venkatesh Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tianying Zheng; Hanyu Jiang; Yi Wei; Zixing Huang; Jie Chen; Ting Duan; Bin Song Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.087