Literature DB >> 26029283

Disseminating results: community response and input on Kisumu breastfeeding study.

K Ondenge1, E McLellan-Lemal2, E Awuonda1, F Angira1, L A Mills3, T Thomas2.   

Abstract

Communicating findings to study participants and their communities is a practice that often gets overlooked or receives low prioritization by research investigators, but is crucially important. The purpose of this study was to describe the process and community response to the dissemination of results from the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study (KiBS), specifically in terms of (1) community research knowledge and expectations and (2) impressions of result dissemination efforts. A qualitative evaluation was completed for 10 result dissemination events using focus group discussions (FGDs) (n = 10; total number of participants = 98). An inductive, thematic qualitative data analysis was completed in NVivo 8.0. Overall, FGD participants expressed great appreciation for being given information on the study results. Participants had a good understanding of what research entails and had specific expectations for the process, including that the community receive information about the study, not only at the end of the study but also at regular intervals throughout the study's conduct. They also wanted to receive the communications from a credible source, the principal investigator preferably. Other expectations centered on better community and research interactions and development and the use of community collaborators. Impressions of KiBS result dissemination events were positive, but suggestions for the future included having the event in a larger area, inviting more people, having more written materials, and putting the information in an entertaining format such as skits or movies. Sharing study findings with local community members is essential and beneficial to the researchers' long-term engagement with communities and importantly, the successful implementation of study findings when appropriate. It is imperative that dissemination of results be embedded as an integral part of research project planning and development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Community feedback; Dissemination; FGDs; KiBS; Study results

Year:  2015        PMID: 26029283      PMCID: PMC4444705          DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0303-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Peggy G Chen; Nitza Diaz; Georgina Lucas; Marjorie S Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research.

Authors:  James V Lavery; Paulina O Tinadana; Thomas W Scott; Laura C Harrington; Janine M Ramsey; Claudia Ytuarte-Nuñez; Anthony A James
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  Towards a science of community engagement.

Authors:  Peter A Newman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results.

Authors:  Howard Mann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Voices and paradigms: perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing.

Authors:  J C Campbell; S Bunting
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.824

7.  Reporting the findings of clinical trials: a discussion paper.

Authors:  D Ghersi; M Clarke; J Berlin; Am Gülmezoglu; R Kush; P Lumbiganon; D Moher; F Rockhold; I Sim; E Wager
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Conducting an assessment of health needs and resources in a racial/ethnic minority community.

Authors:  M Lillie-Blanton; S C Hoffman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.

Authors:  Rachel G Tabak; Elaine C Khoong; David A Chambers; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Ethics in practice: the state of the debate on promoting the social value of global health research in resource poor settings particularly Africa.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Lairumbi; Parker Michael; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Michael C English
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  2 in total

1.  Not the last word: dissemination strategies for patient-centred research in nursing.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Karen Schmidt; Guyanna R Ackison; Megan Murphy; Jennifer R Jones
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  Engagement of community stakeholders to develop a framework to guide research dissemination to communities.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Tilicia Mayo-Gamble; Yolanda Vaughn; Jim Hawk; Mike Helms; Claudia Barajas; Yvonne Joosten
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.