Literature DB >> 26028369

Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.

Elizabeth S Heller Murray1, Gabrielle L Hands2, Carolyn R Calabrese2, Cara E Stepp3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High voice users (individuals who demonstrate excessive or loud vocal use) are at risk for developing voice disorders. The objective of this study was to examine, both acoustically and perceptually, vocal changes in healthy speakers after an acute period of high voice use.
METHODS: Members of a university women's volleyball team (n = 12) were recorded a week before (pre) and week after (post) the 10-week spring season; n = 6 control speakers were recorded over the same time period for comparison. Speakers read four sentences, which were analyzed for relative fundamental frequency (RFF). Eight naïve listeners participated in an auditory-perceptual visual sort and rate (VSR) task, in which they rated each voice sample's overall severity and strain.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found as a function of time point in the VSR ratings for the volleyball group. Onset cycle 1 RFF values were significantly lower (P = 0.04) in the postrecordings of the volleyball participants compared with prerecordings, but there was no significant difference (P = 0.20) in offset cycle 10 RFF values. Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated moderate sensitivity and specificity of onset cycle 1 RFF for discrimination between the volleyball and control participants. Changes were not apparent in the control group as a function of time for either, onset cycle 1 RFF, offset cycle 10 RFF, or either vocal attribute.
CONCLUSIONS: Onset cycle 1 RFF may be an effective marker for detecting vocal changes over an acute high voice use period of time before perceptual changes are noted.
Copyright © 2016 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic analysis; Auditory-perceptual judgment; Dysphonia; High voice use; Relative fundamental frequency; Strain

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028369      PMCID: PMC4662926          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  34 in total

1.  Review: occupational risks for voice problems.

Authors:  K Verdolini; L O Ramig
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.487

2.  Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; K Precoda; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

3.  Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report.

Authors:  I R Titze; J Lemke; D Montequin
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Vocal problems among aerobic instructors and aerobic participants.

Authors:  S E Heidel; J K Torgerson
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 5.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research.

Authors:  J Kreiman; B R Gerratt; G B Kempster; A Erman; G S Berke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

6.  Effect of hydration treatments on laryngeal nodules and polyps and related voice measures.

Authors:  K Verdolini-Marston; M Sandage; I R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level.

Authors:  K Verdolini; I R Titze; A Fennell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-10

Review 8.  Treatment efficacy: voice disorders.

Authors:  L O Ramig; K Verdolini
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Voice problems and risk factors among aerobics instructors.

Authors:  J Long; H N Williford; M S Olson; V Wolfe
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices.

Authors:  Nelson Roy; Ray M Merrill; Susan Thibeault; Steven D Gray; Elaine M Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relative Fundamental Frequency in Children With and Without Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Roxanne K Segina; Geralyn Harvey Woodnorth; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic Model of Perceived Overall Severity of Dysphonia in Adductor-Type Laryngeal Dystonia.

Authors:  Daniel P Buckley; Manuel Diaz Cadiz; Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Manuel Díaz Cádiz; Kathleen F Nagle; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.

Authors:  Mara R Kapsner-Smith; Amanda Opuszynski; Cara E Stepp; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.