Literature DB >> 26026169

DisVis: quantifying and visualizing accessible interaction space of distance-restrained biomolecular complexes.

G C P van Zundert1, A M J J Bonvin1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We present DisVis, a Python package and command line tool to calculate the reduced accessible interaction space of distance-restrained binary protein complexes, allowing for direct visualization and quantification of the information content of the distance restraints. The approach is general and can also be used as a knowledge-based distance energy term in FFT-based docking directly during the sampling stage.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code with documentation is freely available from https://github.com/haddocking/disvis. CONTACT: a.m.j.j.bonvin@uu.nl SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26026169      PMCID: PMC4576694          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

Structural characterization of protein complexes is of paramount importance for a fundamental understanding of cellular processes, and with major applications in rational drug design. As the quantity of experimentally determined complexes is only a fraction of their total predicted number, complementary computational techniques have been developed for predicting the structure of complexes from their components (Petrey and Honig, 2014; Rodrigues and Bonvin, 2014). Additional low-resolution information in the form of distance restraints can significantly benefit the modeling, with a variety of experimental methods providing such information, such as chemical cross-links detected by mass spectrometry (MS) (Rappsilber, 2011), and distance measurements from electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and FRET (Kalinin ). When two biomolecules are known to interact and no high-resolution model is available, the structure of the complex can naively be any one state where the molecules are in contact. We define the accessible interaction space of the complex as the set of all these states. If a distance restraint is imposed on the complex, the accessible interaction space reduces, depending on the information content of the restraint. The interaction space is further reduced if multiple restraints are included. So far, however, no computational method has been reported that quantifies this reduction or allows to visualize this accessible interaction space. To aid in this task, we have developed DisVis, a GPU-accelerated Python software package and command line tool (disvis) for quantifying and visualizing the accessible interaction space of distance-restrained binary complexes. Disvis takes as input two atomic structures and a file with distance restraints, and outputs the sum of complexes complying with a given number of restraints together with a density showing the maximum number of consistent restraints at every position in space. This indicates whether all data are consistent and can be combined without violations, and allows identification of false positives, quantification of the information content of the restraints and visualization of interesting regions in the interaction space. The method is generic and can easily be incorporated into existing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-accelerated docking programs as a distance-dependent energy function, allowing the ‘marriage made in heaven’ of direct sampling and scoring of FFT-generated docking poses (Vajda ) at a small computational cost.

2 Methods

We discretely sample the accessible interaction space by treating the two biomolecules as rigid bodies and performing a 6 dimensional search over the three translational and three rotational degrees of freedom. We use FFT-techniques to accelerate the translational search using a 1 Å grid spacing (default). These have long been used in the docking field (Katchalski-Katzir ). One chain is fixed in space and considered the receptor molecule, while translational scans are performed for each rotation of the ligand molecule. Two atoms and are considered to be interacting if the distance, , between them is (by default), where is the combined van der Waals radius of the two atoms , and clashing if . A conformation is deemed a complex if the volume of interaction is above- and the volume of clashes below threshold values (300 and 200Å3 by default, respectively). After every translational scan, all conformations that comply with each restraint are determined. Next, disvis counts the number of complexes consistent with each number of restraints, as well as which restraints are violated. This is repeated until the rotational sampling density reaches a pre-set value (default 9.72°, 7416 orientations). During the rotational search, disvis stores the maximum number of consistent restraints found at every scanned position of the ligand’s center of mass, which ultimately results in a discrete ‘density’ map. The output thus consists of the sum of accessible complexes complying with each number of restraints, a percentage of how often each restraint is violated, and a discrete-valued density map. We implemented DisVis in Python2.7, using the OpenCL framework to offload computations to the GPU. The code can be downloaded freely from https://github.com/haddocking/disvis together with documentation and examples.

3 Examples

To illustrate the capabilities of disvis, we applied it on two systems, using MS cross-links data (see the Supplementary Information for details). A fine rotational search (5.27°, 53 256 orientations) was performed using default values. First, we investigated the accessible interaction space of two chains of the RNA polymerase II complex of S. cerevisiae (1WCM, chain A and E) for which 6 BS3 cross-links were available (Chen ; Kahraman ). The allowed distance was set between 0 and 30 Å (Cβ – Cβ) for every restraint. Two false-positive restraints were added with a distance in the crystal structure of 35.7 (FP1) and 42.2 Å (FP2) to test whether they could be identified. Applying disvis shows that none of the 18.9 109 complexes sampled are consistent with all 8 restraints, though a small number are conforming to 7 cross-links (9716 complexes). For the latter, only restraint FP2 is violated. The accessible interaction space consistent with at least 6 restraints is less than 0.03% of the full interaction space (Fig. 1). The density clearly indicates the position of the E-chain. Interestingly, both false-positive restraints are violated in 100% of the complexes consistent with at least six restraints; in contrast, the highest violation percentage of a correct cross-link is only 0.1%. Thus, a high-violation percentage is an indication of a false-positive restraint.
Fig. 1.

(A) The large subunit (purple) and the 27 kDa polypeptide (yellow) of the RNA polymerase II complex. (B) The large subunit and the reduced accessible interaction space of the 27 kDa polypeptide consistent with at least six cross-links in gray. The smooth yellow sphere represents the center of mass of the polypeptide

(A) The large subunit (purple) and the 27 kDa polypeptide (yellow) of the RNA polymerase II complex. (B) The large subunit and the reduced accessible interaction space of the 27 kDa polypeptide consistent with at least six cross-links in gray. The smooth yellow sphere represents the center of mass of the polypeptide Second, we applied disvis on two proteins of the 26 S proteasome of S. pombe, PRE5 (O14250) and PUP2 (Q9UT97), with 7 cross-links available (Leitner ). The acceptable distances for the adipic acid dihydrazide (ADH) and zero-length (ZL) cross-links were set to 23 and 26 Å (Cα − Cα), respectively, as 95% of distances found in a benchmark were shorter (Leitner ). The PRE5-PUP2 complex is significantly smaller than the previous example with the full interaction space consisting of 6.9 109 complexes. Still, the accessible interaction space consistent with all 7 restraints is heavily reduced to less than 0.04% of the full interaction space. The accessible interaction space of the PUP2 chain with respect to PRE5 is overlapping with its center of mass deduced from a homology model (Supplementary Figure S1). The computation for those two examples took 74 and 27 m on 16 AMD Opteron 6344 processors and 76 and 19 m on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 GPU, respectively. However, by increasing the voxel spacing to 2 Å and using a coarser rotational search (9.72°, 7416 orientations) rather similar results can be obtained in only 19 and 8 m, respectively, on a single processor (cf. Supplementary Tables S2 and S4 for example). It should further be noted that the bulk of the time is spent on computing the FFTs and a negligible part on computing the consistent distance restraint space (Supplementary Table S11).

4 Conclusions

We have introduced DisVis, a Python package and command line tool to quantify and visualize the information content of distance restraints, and a powerful aid in detecting the presence of false-positive restraints. Our novel approach can be easily incorporated in FFT-accelerated docking programs, allowing the use of any form of distance-dependent energy function.

Funding

This work was supported by the Dutch Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO) [ECHO grant no.711.011.009]. Conflict of Interest: none declared.
  9 in total

1.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques.

Authors:  E Katchalski-Katzir; I Shariv; M Eisenstein; A A Friesem; C Aflalo; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

3.  A toolkit and benchmark study for FRET-restrained high-precision structural modeling.

Authors:  Stanislav Kalinin; Thomas Peulen; Simon Sindbert; Paul J Rothwell; Sylvia Berger; Tobias Restle; Roger S Goody; Holger Gohlke; Claus A M Seidel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions.

Authors:  João P G L M Rodrigues; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 5.  Structural bioinformatics of the interactome.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  Chemical cross-linking/mass spectrometry targeting acidic residues in proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Alexander Leitner; Lukasz A Joachimiak; Pia Unverdorben; Thomas Walzthoeni; Judith Frydman; Friedrich Förster; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Architecture of the RNA polymerase II-TFIIF complex revealed by cross-linking and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zhuo Angel Chen; Anass Jawhari; Lutz Fischer; Claudia Buchen; Salman Tahir; Tomislav Kamenski; Morten Rasmussen; Laurent Lariviere; Jimi-Carlo Bukowski-Wills; Michael Nilges; Patrick Cramer; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Cross-link guided molecular modeling with ROSETTA.

Authors:  Abdullah Kahraman; Franz Herzog; Alexander Leitner; George Rosenberger; Ruedi Aebersold; Lars Malmström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The beginning of a beautiful friendship: cross-linking/mass spectrometry and modelling of proteins and multi-protein complexes.

Authors:  Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.867

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Histone Interaction Landscapes Visualized by Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry in Intact Cell Nuclei.

Authors:  Domenico Fasci; Hugo van Ingen; Richard A Scheltema; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Accounting for pairwise distance restraints in FFT-based protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Bing Xia; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Integrating Cross-Linking Experiments with Ab Initio Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Devin K Schweppe; Juan D Chavez; Chad R Weisbrod; Sayaka Shibata; Chunxiang Zheng; James E Bruce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Architecture and functional dynamics of the pentafunctional AROM complex.

Authors:  Harshul Arora Verasztó; Maria Logotheti; Reinhard Albrecht; Alexander Leitner; Hongbo Zhu; Marcus D Hartmann
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  The interactome of intact mitochondria by cross-linking mass spectrometry provides evidence for coexisting respiratory supercomplexes.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Philip Lössl; Beverley M Rabbitts; Robert S Balaban; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  TRiC controls transcription resumption after UV damage by regulating Cockayne syndrome protein A.

Authors:  Alex Pines; Madelon Dijk; Matthew Makowski; Elisabeth M Meulenbroek; Mischa G Vrouwe; Yana van der Weegen; Marijke Baltissen; Pim J French; Martin E van Royen; Martijn S Luijsterburg; Leon H Mullenders; Michiel Vermeulen; Wim Vermeulen; Navraj S Pannu; Haico van Attikum
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Flexibility of intrinsically disordered degrons in AUX/IAA proteins reinforces auxin co-receptor assemblies.

Authors:  Michael Niemeyer; Elena Moreno Castillo; Christian H Ihling; Claudio Iacobucci; Verona Wilde; Antje Hellmuth; Wolfgang Hoehenwarter; Sophia L Samodelov; Matias D Zurbriggen; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Andrea Sinz; Luz Irina A Calderón Villalobos
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Reliable identification of protein-protein interactions by crosslinking mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Swantje Lenz; Ludwig R Sinn; Francis J O'Reilly; Lutz Fischer; Fritz Wegner; Juri Rappsilber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Glycan-protein cross-linking mass spectrometry reveals sialic acid-mediated protein networks on cell surfaces.

Authors:  Yixuan Xie; Siyu Chen; Qiongyu Li; Ying Sheng; Michael Russelle Alvarez; Joeriggo Reyes; Gege Xu; Kemal Solakyildirim; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  A Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Approach Defines Protein Interactions in Yeast Mitochondria.

Authors:  Andreas Linden; Markus Deckers; Iwan Parfentev; Ralf Pflanz; Bettina Homberg; Piotr Neumann; Ralf Ficner; Peter Rehling; Henning Urlaub
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.