Literature DB >> 24588898

Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions.

João P G L M Rodrigues1, Alexandre M J J Bonvin.   

Abstract

Protein interactions define the homeostatic state of the cell. Our ability to understand these interactions and their role in both health and disease is tied to our knowledge of the 3D atomic structure of the interacting partners and their complexes. Despite advances in experimental method of structure determination, the majority of known protein interactions are still missing an atomic structure. High-resolution methods such as X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy struggle with the high-throughput demand, while low-resolution techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy or small-angle X-ray scattering provide data that are too coarse. Computational structure prediction of protein complexes, or docking, was first developed to complement experimental research and has since blossomed into an independent and lively field of research. Its most successful products are hybrid approaches that combine powerful algorithms with experimental data from various sources to generate high-resolution models of protein complexes. This minireview introduces the concept of docking and docking with the help of experimental data, compares and contrasts the available integrative docking methods, and provides a guide for the experimental researcher for what types of data and which particular software can be used to model a protein complex.
© 2014 FEBS.

Keywords:  3D structure; complexes; data-driven docking; integrative modeling; interface prediction; protein docking; protein interactions; restraints; sampling; scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24588898     DOI: 10.1111/febs.12771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  36 in total

1.  Cryo-EM Data Are Superior to Contact and Interface Information in Integrative Modeling.

Authors:  Sjoerd J de Vries; Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne; Christina E M Schindler; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Substrate channeling between the human dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase.

Authors:  Nuo Wang; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry to determine the subunit interaction network in a recombinant human SAGA HAT subcomplex.

Authors:  Nha-Thi Nguyen-Huynh; Grigory Sharov; Clément Potel; Pélagie Fichter; Simon Trowitzsch; Imre Berger; Valérie Lamour; Patrick Schultz; Noëlle Potier; Emmanuelle Leize-Wagner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Weak protein complexes: challenging to study but essential for life.

Authors:  Jun Qin; Angela M Gronenborn
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.542

5.  Performance and enhancement of the LZerD protein assembly pipeline in CAPRI 38-46.

Authors:  Charles Christoffer; Genki Terashi; Woong-Hee Shin; Tunde Aderinwale; Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya; Lenna Peterson; Jacob Verburgt; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Updates to the Integrated Protein-Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Iain H Moal; Anna Vangone; Brian G Pierce; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Raphael Chaleil; Brian Jiménez-García; Paul A Bates; Juan Fernandez-Recio; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Computational prediction of protein interfaces: A review of data driven methods.

Authors:  Li C Xue; Drena Dobbs; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 9.  Beyond history and "on a roll": The list of the most well-studied human protein structures and overall trends in the protein data bank.

Authors:  Zhen-Lu Li; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Structural prediction of protein models using distance restraints derived from cross-linking mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Orbán-Németh; Rebecca Beveridge; David M Hollenstein; Evelyn Rampler; Thomas Stranzl; Otto Hudecz; Johannes Doblmann; Peter Schlögelhofer; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.