Literature DB >> 26025556

The time course of explicit and implicit categorization.

J David Smith1, Alexandria C Zakrzewski2, Eric R Herberger2, Joseph Boomer2, Jessica L Roeder3, F Gregory Ashby3, Barbara A Church2.   

Abstract

Contemporary theory in cognitive neuroscience distinguishes, among the processes and utilities that serve categorization, explicit and implicit systems of category learning that learn, respectively, category rules by active hypothesis testing or adaptive behaviors by association and reinforcement. Little is known about the time course of categorization within these systems. Accordingly, the present experiments contrasted tasks that fostered explicit categorization (because they had a one-dimensional, rule-based solution) or implicit categorization (because they had a two-dimensional, information-integration solution). In Experiment 1, participants learned categories under unspeeded or speeded conditions. In Experiment 2, they applied previously trained category knowledge under unspeeded or speeded conditions. Speeded conditions selectively impaired implicit category learning and implicit mature categorization. These results illuminate the processing dynamics of explicit/implicit categorization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Category learning; Cognitive neuroscience; Explicit cognition; Implicit cognition; Response deadlines

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025556      PMCID: PMC4607559          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0933-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  44 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

4.  A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; John M Ennis; Brian J Spiering
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

6.  Classification and perceptual development: exploring issues about integrality and differential sensitivity.

Authors:  J R Aschkenasy; R D Odom
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1982-12

7.  Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic.

Authors:  J David Smith; F Gregory Ashby; Mark E Berg; Matthew S Murphy; Brian Spiering; Robert G Cook; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  Children and adults learn family-resemblance categories analytically.

Authors:  T B Ward; E Vela; S D Hass
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1990-06

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Selective attention in rat visual category learning.

Authors:  Matthew B Broschard; Jangjin Kim; Bradley C Love; Edward A Wasserman; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Single-session label training alters neural competition between objects and faces.

Authors:  Gabriella Silva; Harold A Rocha; Ethan Kutlu; Maeve R Boylan; Lisa S Scott; Andreas Keil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.