Literature DB >> 26025340

Influence of anode surface chemistry on microbial fuel cell operation.

Carlo Santoro1, Sofia Babanova2, Kateryna Artyushkova2, Jose A Cornejo2, Linnea Ista3, Orianna Bretschger4, Enrico Marsili5, Plamen Atanassov6, Andrew J Schuler7.   

Abstract

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) modified gold anodes are used in single chamber microbial fuel cells for organic removal and electricity generation. Hydrophilic (N(CH3)3(+), OH, COOH) and hydrophobic (CH3) SAMs are examined for their effect on bacterial attachment, current and power output. The different substratum chemistry affects the community composition of the electrochemically active biofilm formed and thus the current and power output. Of the four SAM-modified anodes tested, N(CH3)3(+) results in the shortest start up time (15 days), highest current achieved (225 μA cm(-2)) and highest MFC power density (40 μW cm(-2)), followed by COOH (150 μA cm(-2) and 37 μW cm(-2)) and OH (83 μA cm(-2) and 27 μW cm(-2)) SAMs. Hydrophobic SAM decreases electrochemically active bacteria attachment and anode performance in comparison to hydrophilic SAMs (CH3 modified anodes 7 μA cm(-2) anodic current and 1.2 μW cm(-2) MFC's power density). A consortium of Clostridia and δ-Proteobacteria is found on all the anode surfaces, suggesting a synergistic cooperation under anodic conditions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anode biofilm analysis; Bioelectrocatalysis; Microbial fuel cells; Self assembled monolayer; Surface modification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025340      PMCID: PMC4894060          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2015.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  43 in total

1.  Experimental and theoretical examination of surface energy and adhesion of nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria using self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Mohiuddin Md Taimur Khan; Linnea K Ista; Gabriel P Lopez; Andrew J Schuler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Procedure for determining maximum sustainable power generated by microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Joseph Menicucci; Haluk Beyenal; Enrico Marsili; Raajaraajan Angathevar Veluchamy; Goksel Demir; Zbigniew Lewandowski
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Mediating electron transfer from bacteria to a gold electrode via a self-assembled monolayer.

Authors:  Scott R Crittenden; Christian J Sund; James J Sumner
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 4.  Microbial ecology meets electrochemistry: electricity-driven and driving communities.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; Jorge Rodríguez; Linda L Blackall; Jurg Keller; Pamela Gross; Damien Batstone; Willy Verstraete; Kenneth H Nealson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  A comparison of methods for total community DNA preservation and extraction from various thermal environments.

Authors:  Kendra R Mitchell; Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  Identifying the microbial communities and operational conditions for optimized wastewater treatment in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Angela Wu; Yuko Yamanaka; Kenneth H Nealson; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output.

Authors:  Matthieu Picot; Laure Lapinsonnière; Michael Rothballer; Frédéric Barrière
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  Experimental and theoretical demonstrations for the mechanism behind enhanced microbial electron transfer by CNT network.

Authors:  Xian-Wei Liu; Jie-Jie Chen; Yu-Xi Huang; Xue-Fei Sun; Guo-Ping Sheng; Dao-Bo Li; Lu Xiong; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Feng Zhao; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  How Comparable are Microbial Electrochemical Systems around the Globe? An Electrochemical and Microbiological Cross-Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Sofia Babanova; Pierangela Cristiani; Kateryna Artyushkova; Plamen Atanassov; Alain Bergel; Orianna Bretschger; Robert K Brown; Kayla Carpenter; Alessandra Colombo; Rachel Cortese; Benjamin Erable; Falk Harnisch; Mounika Kodali; Sujal Phadke; Sebastian Riedl; Luis F M Rosa; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.928

2.  Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Catia Arbizzani; Benjamin Erable; Ioannis Ieropoulos
Journal:  J Power Sources       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 9.127

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.