Literature DB >> 24183402

Identifying the microbial communities and operational conditions for optimized wastewater treatment in microbial fuel cells.

Shun'ichi Ishii1, Shino Suzuki, Trina M Norden-Krichmar, Angela Wu, Yuko Yamanaka, Kenneth H Nealson, Orianna Bretschger.   

Abstract

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are devices that exploit microorganisms as "biocatalysts" to recover energy from organic matter in the form of electricity. MFCs have been explored as possible energy neutral wastewater treatment systems; however, fundamental knowledge is still required about how MFC-associated microbial communities are affected by different operational conditions and can be optimized for accelerated wastewater treatment rates. In this study, we explored how electricity-generating microbial biofilms were established at MFC anodes and responded to three different operational conditions during wastewater treatment: 1) MFC operation using a 750 Ω external resistor (0.3 mA current production); 2) set-potential (SP) operation with the anode electrode potentiostatically controlled to +100 mV vs SHE (4.0 mA current production); and 3) open circuit (OC) operation (zero current generation). For all reactors, primary clarifier effluent collected from a municipal wastewater plant was used as the sole carbon and microbial source. Batch operation demonstrated nearly complete organic matter consumption after a residence time of 8-12 days for the MFC condition, 4-6 days for the SP condition, and 15-20 days for the OC condition. These results indicate that higher current generation accelerates organic matter degradation during MFC wastewater treatment. The microbial community analysis was conducted for the three reactors using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Although the inoculated wastewater was dominated by members of Epsilonproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes species, the electricity-generating biofilms in MFC and SP reactors were dominated by Deltaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Within Deltaproteobacteria, phylotypes classified to family Desulfobulbaceae and Geobacteraceae increased significantly under the SP condition with higher current generation; however those phylotypes were not found in the OC reactor. These analyses suggest that species related to family Desulfobulbaceae and Geobacteraceae are correlated with the electricity generation in the biofilm and may be key players for optimizing wastewater treatment rates and energy recovery in applied MFC systems.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA clone analysis; Anode biofilm; Microbial community dynamics; Microbial fuel cell; Potentiostatic operation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183402     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  11 in total

1.  Resilience, Dynamics, and Interactions within a Model Multispecies Exoelectrogenic-Biofilm Community.

Authors:  Anna Prokhorova; Katrin Sturm-Richter; Andreas Doetsch; Johannes Gescher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Influence of anode surface chemistry on microbial fuel cell operation.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Sofia Babanova; Kateryna Artyushkova; Jose A Cornejo; Linnea Ista; Orianna Bretschger; Enrico Marsili; Plamen Atanassov; Andrew J Schuler
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Isolation, selection, and biological characterization research of highly effective electricigens from MFCs for phenol degradation.

Authors:  Guo Wei; Du Xia; Wang Li-Li; Yan Hong
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Competition of two highly specialized and efficient acetoclastic electroactive bacteria for acetate in biofilm anode of microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Veerraghavulu Sapireddy; Krishna P Katuri; Ali Muhammad; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.290

5.  How Comparable are Microbial Electrochemical Systems around the Globe? An Electrochemical and Microbiological Cross-Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Sofia Babanova; Pierangela Cristiani; Kateryna Artyushkova; Plamen Atanassov; Alain Bergel; Orianna Bretschger; Robert K Brown; Kayla Carpenter; Alessandra Colombo; Rachel Cortese; Benjamin Erable; Falk Harnisch; Mounika Kodali; Sujal Phadke; Sebastian Riedl; Luis F M Rosa; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.928

6.  Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review.

Authors:  Carlo Santoro; Catia Arbizzani; Benjamin Erable; Ioannis Ieropoulos
Journal:  J Power Sources       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 9.127

Review 7.  An Overview of Electron Acceptors in Microbial Fuel Cells.

Authors:  Deniz Ucar; Yifeng Zhang; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Microbial metabolic networks in a complex electrogenic biofilm recovered from a stimulus-induced metatranscriptomics approach.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Aaron Tenney; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Kenneth H Nealson; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of storage on mixed-culture biological electrodes.

Authors:  Soroush Saheb Alam; Frank Persson; Britt-Marie Wilén; Malte Hermansson; Oskar Modin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Identification of Cable Bacteria Attached to the Anode of a Benthic Microbial Fuel Cell: Evidence of Long Distance Extracellular Electron Transport to Electrodes.

Authors:  Clare E Reimers; Cheng Li; Michael F Graw; Paul S Schrader; Michael Wolf
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.