Peng Fu1, John B MacMillan1. 1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390, United States.
Abstract
Spithioneines A and B (1 and 2), two new bohemamine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids possessing an unusual ergothioneine moiety, were isolated from a marine-derived Streptomyces spinoverrucosus. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic analysis, CD spectra, and chemical degradation and synthesis. Compounds 1 and 2 are rare natural products that incorporate the amino acid ergothioneine.
Spithioneines A and B (1 and 2), two new bohemamine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids possessing an unusual ergothioneine moiety, were isolated from a marine-derived Streptomyces spinoverrucosus. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic analysis, CD spectra, and chemical degradation and synthesis. Compounds 1 and 2 are rare natural products that incorporate the amino acid ergothioneine.
Bacteria are
prolific producers of structurally complex natural products, often
incorporating multiple biosynthetic pathways to produce molecules
of complex structure.[1] Over the past two
decades there has been increased interest in exploiting the complex
chemical diversity from marine bacteria, leading to the discovery
and biological characterization of more than 400 new secondary metabolites
with cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity from this resource.[2] Among these novel structures are the abyssomycins,[3] lomaiviticin,[4] salinosporamide
A,[5] and the marinomycins,[6] all of which have garnered the interest of chemical and
biological investigations into the potential role of these molecules
as therapeutics.In our ongoing research efforts to identify
bioactive metabolites from marine-derived bacteria based on a combination
of structural novelty and biological activity, we have combined our
natural product fraction library with high-throughput screening and
analytical characterization by LC–MS and NMR profiling. In
this process, some bioactive compounds with novel structures have
been identified.[7] Although we are typically
focused on active molecules, we occasionally observe unusual structural
features that are further investigated.As part of these efforts,
we were attracted to a series of olefinic and aromatic 1H NMR signals observed in extracts from the Streptomyces
spinoverrucosus strain SNB-048. Further analysis of the extract
by LC–UV–MS revealed that it contained metabolites with
similar UV absorptions to those of the pyrrolizidine-containing bohemamines
(3 and 4).[8] Chemical
investigation resulted in the isolation of two new bohemamine-type
pyrrolizidine alkaloids, spithioneines A and B (1 and 2) (Figure 1). Structurally, compounds 1 and 2 possess an ergothioneine moiety, which
is rare in natural products.[9]
Figure 1
Structures
of spithioneines (1 and 2) and bohemamines
(3 and 4).
Structures
of spithioneines (1 and 2) and bohemamines
(3 and 4).Spithioneine A (1) was isolated as a colorless
oil that gave a HRESIMS [M + H]+ ion of m/z 492.2274, corresponding to a molecular formula
of C23H33N5O5S (calcd
for C23H34N5O5S, 492.2275).
The IR spectrum showed stretches indicative of an amide group (3409
cm–1) and a α,β-unsaturated ketone (1649
cm–1). The UV spectrum displayed absorptions at
250, 278, and 330 nm, similar to those reported for bohemamines.[8] The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 in DMSO-d6 indicated the presence of
two methyl groups at δ 1.37 (s) and δ 1.30 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), two vinyl methyl groups at δ 2.13 (d, J = 1.3 Hz) and δ 1.87 (d, J = 1.3
Hz), two olefinic proton signals at δ 6.01 (m) and δ 5.52
(s), and an amide exchangeable proton at δ 10.48 (s). Three
methine signals at δ 3.91 (d, J = 1.4 Hz),
δ 3.76 (dd, J = 2.2, 1.4 Hz), and δ 3.89
(qd, J = 6.7, 2.2 Hz) could also be observed. The 13C NMR spectrum in DMSO-d6 showed
two carbonyl signals at δ 201.0 and δ 164.0, assignable
to a ketone and amide, respectively. The NMR signals (Table 1) were consistent with those of bohemamine C (4) and 5-chlorobohemamine C,[8c] indicating
spithioneine A is composed of a pyrrolizidine core.
Table 1
1H (600 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR Data for
Compounds 1 and 2 in DMSO-d6
1
2
no.
δC
δH, mult. (J in Hz)
δC
δH, mult. (J in Hz)
1
201.0, C
200.2, C
2
94.4, CH
5.52, s
94.4, CH
5.51, s
3
166.7,
C
166.2, C
4
61.3, CH
3.89, qd (6.7,
2.2)
54.4, CH
4.44, q (6.7)
5
62.8, CH
3.76, dd (2.2,
1.4)
81.6, CH
3.90, s
6
76.7, CH
3.91, d (1.4)
73.1, CH
3.47, s
7
77.6, C
77.4, C
8
24.6, CH3
1.37, s
23.6, CH3
1.17, s
9
18.6,
CH3
1.30, d (6.7)
19.4, CH3
1.34, d (6.7)
1′
164.0, C
163.9, C
2′
117.7, CH
6.01, m
117.6, CH
6.01, m
3′
156.2,
C
156.5, C
4′
27.3, CH3
1.87, d (1.3)
27.3, CH3
1.90, s
5′
20.0, CH3
2.13, d (1.3)
20.0, CH3
2.15, s
1″
136.4, C
144.2, C
2″
NDa
6.92, s
ND
7.13, s
3″
ND
136.6, C
4″
25.9, CH2
3.11, dd (14.4, 4.0)
25.5, CH2
3.18, dd (14.0, 3.6)
3.02, dd (14.4, 9.6)
3.08, dd (14.0,
10.4)
5″
77.4, CH
3.79, dd (9.5, 4.0)
77.4, CH
3.84,
dd (10.2, 3.8)
6″
167.3,
C
166.7, C
3-NH
10.48, s
10.55, brs
5″-NCH3
51.2, CH3
3.15, s
51.1, CH3
3.15, s
ND: not detected.
Key HMBC, 1H–1H COSY, and NOESY correlations for 1 and 2.The structure of the pyrrolizidine core was supported by
the 13C NMR data (Table 1). Critical
assignments were based on COSY correlations of H-9/H4/H-5/H-6, and
the key HMBC correlations from H-2 to C-1/C-3/C-7, H-4 to C-3/C-9,
H-5 to C-4/C-6/C-7/C-9, H-8 to C-1/C-6/C-7, 3-NH to C-2/C-1′,
H-2′ to C-1′/C-3′, H-4′ to C-2′/C-3′/C-5′,
and H-5′ to C-2′/C-3′/C-4′ (Figure 2). Moreover, the 1H NMR spectrum in DMSO-d6 showed an olefinic proton at δ 6.92
(s), two methylene protons at δ 3.11 (dd, J = 14.4, 4.0 Hz) and δ 3.02 (dd, J = 14.4,
9.6 Hz), a methine proton at δ 3.79 (dd, J =
9.5, 4.0 Hz), and three equivalent singlet methyl protons at δ
3.15. The correlation between methylene (H-4″) and methine
(H-5″) was determined by COSY. The large methyl singlet at
δ 3.15 with a corresponding 13C at δ 51.2 was
highly suggestive of trimethylammonium functionality. The HMBC correlations
from the δ 3.15 singlet to C-5″ (δ 77.4) further
supported the proposed trimethylammonium functional group. The HMBC
correlations from both H-4″ and H-5″ to a carbonyl carbon
C-6″ (δC 167.3) suggested the existence of
an amino acid derivative.
Figure 2
Key HMBC, 1H–1H COSY, and NOESY correlations for 1 and 2.
As not all signals of the 13C NMR spectrum in DMSO-d6 were observable,
an additional set of spectra were obtained in CD3OD. The 13C NMR spectrum in CD3OD (Table
S1) showed two additional olefinic carbons at δ 121.0
and δ 136.6 that corresponded to C-2″ and C-3″.
The HMBC correlations (in CD3OD) from H-4″ to C-2″/C-3″
and H-2″ to C-1″ (δC 138.7)/C-3″
indicated the presence of a hercynine moiety in 1.[10] This moiety shows identical NMR chemical shifts
as those found in ergothioneine,[11] clithioneine,[9a] and JBIR-73.[9b] The
remaining sulfur, the 13C chemical shifts of C-5 and C-1″,
and the HMBC correlation from H-5 to C-1″ established the connection
between the hercynine unit and the bohemamine skeleton.ND: not detected.NOE
correlations between H-5 and H-9, between H-6 and H-8, and between
H-4 and H-8 were observed in the 2D NOESY, suggesting the relative
configuration of 1 as shown (Figure 2) and identical to that of bohemamine (3). NOE
correlations combined with the small coupling constants between H-4
and H-5 (J = 3.4 Hz) and between H-5 and H-6 (J = 2.0 Hz) also indicated the conformation of 1 as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3
CD spectra of 1 and 2 in MeOH. Representation of the octant rule for
the cyclopentenone moiety of 1.
In order to determine
the absolute configuration, we utilized CD spectroscopy. On the basis
of the octant rule for cyclopentenone,[12] the positive Cotton effect at 337 nm (Δε +48.5) for n–π* suggested that the absolute configuration
was (4S,5S,6S,7S), consistent with the core configuration of bohemamines,
such as NP25302, whose absolute configuration has been determined
by total synthesis.[13] However, the absolute
configuration of most bohemamine analogues have not been reported.
The octant rule for cyclopentenone could be an effective method to
determine the absolute configurations of this family of compounds
(Figures 3 and S1).To further confirm the structure and the absolute configuration
of the C-5″, we treated 1 with Raney–Nickel[14] to yield bohemamine C and hercynine (Scheme 1). We were able to isolate sufficient quantities
of bohemamine C (4) for analysis by MS, NMR, and CD (Figure S1). The specific rotation of isolated
hercynine ([α]D23 +40.1) was determined
to be consistent with literature reports for (S)-hercynine
([α]D22 +44.7).[15] Thus, the absolute configuration of C-5″ was determined as S. In addition, compound 1 could be detected
by LC–MS in the reaction mixture of bohemamine and l-ergothioneine under alkaline condition (Scheme 1 and Figure S2).
Scheme 1
Chemical Transformation of 1 and 2
CD spectra of 1 and 2 in MeOH. Representation of the octant rule for
the cyclopentenone moiety of 1.The molecular formula of spithioneine
B (2) was found to be C23H33N5O6S based on the HRESIMS (Supporting
Information), which was only one oxygen more than that of 1. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 2 (Tables 1 and S1) were similar to those of 1 except for some
differences observed for the chemical shifts of C-4, C-5, C-6, and
C-1″, all locations near the sulfide moiety. Thus, we deduced
the sulfide in 1 was oxidized to give the sulfoxide in 2. This was confirmed by treatment of 1 with
oxone in THF/H2O at 0 °C to yield 2 (Scheme 1) and analysis of resultant compound.[16] The configuration of the chiral sulfoxide moiety
was not determined.A plausible biosynthetic pathway for spithioneines
A and B (1 and 2) is postulated (Scheme 2) to originate from amino acid and polyketide biosynthesis. l-Ornithine or l-arginine undergoes oxidation and reduction
to yield intermediate a, which can form intermediate b by condensation with acetate.[17] Formation of the bohemamine core would be generated from intermediate b, which undergoes dual nucleophilic addition of the amine
and dehydration to form the pyrrolizidine ring system (intermediate c). Amidation of intermediate c would give rise
to bohemamine B, which can be converted to the epoxide to yield bohemamine
(3). The sulfur atom of ergothioneine, which is known
to be derived from histidine,[18] would carry
out nucleophilic attack from the backside of the epoxide to give 1, and further oxidize to generate 2. Recently,
the draft genome sequencing of the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. TP-A0873, a producer of bohemamine, was carried out. The genome
contained at least 14 gene clusters for polyketide synthase (PKS)
and nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). However, biosynthetic
gene clusters for bohemamine were not identified.[19]
Scheme 2
Plausible Biosynthetic Pathway of Spithioneines A
and B (1 and 2)
Compounds 1 and 2 showed no
cytotoxicity to the nonsmall cell lung cancer cell lines HCC366, A549,
HCC44, and HCC1171 or antibacterial activities against Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis.In summary, we identified two new bohemamine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids
from a marine-derived Streptomyces spinoverrucosus. Their interest lies in the incorporation of the ergothioneine moiety
into a polyketide. Ergothioneine itself has a variety of interesting
biological activities. Past studies have implicated ergothioneine
to be an inhibitor of oxidative stress,[20] promoter of neuronal differentiation,[21] and metal ion chelator.[22] Ergothioneine
accumulates in higher organisms up to millimolar levels via active
transport with organic cation transporter (OCTN1).[23] The physiological role of ergothioneine has yet to be established.
Authors: Robert H Feling; Greg O Buchanan; Tracy J Mincer; Christopher A Kauffman; Paul R Jensen; William Fenical Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2003-01-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Bojan Bister; Daniel Bischoff; Markus Ströbele; Julia Riedlinger; Andreas Reicke; Falko Wolter; Alan T Bull; Hans Zähner; Hans-Peter Fiedler; Roderich D Süssmuth Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Wen Hu; Heng Song; Ampon Sae Her; Daniel W Bak; Nathchar Naowarojna; Sean J Elliott; Li Qin; Xiaoping Chen; Pinghua Liu Journal: Org Lett Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Shan Wang; William D G Brittain; Qian Zhang; Zhou Lu; Ming Him Tong; Kewen Wu; Kwaku Kyeremeh; Matthew Jenner; Yi Yu; Steven L Cobb; Hai Deng Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Dini Hu; Cheng Gao; Chenghang Sun; Tao Jin; Guangyi Fan; Kai Meng Mok; Simon Ming-Yuen Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hooi-Leng Ser; Uma D Palanisamy; Wai-Fong Yin; Sri N Abd Malek; Kok-Gan Chan; Bey-Hing Goh; Learn-Han Lee Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 5.640