Literature DB >> 26023242

Variation of Magnetic Particle Imaging Tracer Performance With Amplitude and Frequency of the Applied Magnetic Field.

Asahi Tomitaka1, Richard Matthew Ferguson2, Amit P Khandhar2, Scott J Kemp2, Satoshi Ota3, Kosuke Nakamura3, Yasushi Takemura3, Kannan M Krishnan1.   

Abstract

The magnetic response of magnetic particle imaging (MPI) tracers varies with the slew rate of the applied magnetic field, as well as with the tracer's average magnetic core size. Currently, 25 kHz and 20 mT/μ0 drive fields are common in MPI, but lower field amplitudes may be necessary for patient safety in future designs. We studied how several different sizes of monodisperse MPI tracers behaved under different drive field amplitude and frequency, using magnetic particle spectrometry and ac hysteresis for drive field conditions at 16, 26, and 40 kHz, with field amplitudes from 5 to 40 mT/μ0. We observed that both field amplitude and frequency can influence the tracer behavior, but that the magnetic behavior is consistent when the slew rate (the product of field amplitude and frequency) is consistent. However, smaller amplitudes provide a correspondingly smaller field of view, sometimes resulting in excitation of a minor hysteresis loop.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC hysteresis; MPI tracers; iron oxide nanoparticles; magnetic particle imaging (MPI); magnetic particle spectrometry (MPS)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26023242      PMCID: PMC4443712          DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2341570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Magn        ISSN: 0018-9464            Impact factor:   1.700


  8 in total

1.  Tracer design for magnetic particle imaging (invited).

Authors:  R Matthew Ferguson; Amit P Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Size-dependent ferrohydrodynamic relaxometry of magnetic particle imaging tracers in different environments.

Authors:  Hamed Arami; R M Ferguson; Amit P Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimizing magnetite nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  R Matthew Ferguson; Kevin R Minard; Amit P Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monodisperse magnetite nanoparticle tracers for in vivo magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Amit P Khandhar; R Matthew Ferguson; Hamed Arami; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Magnetostimulation limits in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; George Z Zhang; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  The X-space formulation of the magnetic particle imaging process: 1-D signal, resolution, bandwidth, SNR, SAR, and magnetostimulation.

Authors:  Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Tailored magnetic nanoparticles for optimizing magnetic fluid hyperthermia.

Authors:  Amit P Khandhar; R Matthew Ferguson; Julian A Simon; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Tailoring the magnetic and pharmacokinetic properties of iron oxide magnetic particle imaging tracers.

Authors:  Richard Mathew Ferguson; Amit P Khandhar; Hamed Arami; Loc Hua; Ondrej Hovorka; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.411

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Morphology and magnetic flux distribution in superparamagnetic, single-crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticle rings.

Authors:  Yumu Takeno; Yasukazu Murakami; Takeshi Sato; Toshiaki Tanigaki; Hyun Soon Park; Daisuke Shindo; R Matthew Ferguson; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Dynamic magnetic characterization and magnetic particle imaging enhancement of magnetic-gold core-shell nanoparticles.

Authors:  Asahi Tomitaka; Satoshi Ota; Kizuku Nishimoto; Hamed Arami; Yasushi Takemura; Madhavan Nair
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Benchtop magnetic particle relaxometer for detection, characterization and analysis of magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Nicolas Garraud; Rohan Dhavalikar; Mythreyi Unni; Shehaab Savliwala; Carlos Rinaldi; David P Arnold
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Getting into the brain: Potential of nanotechnology in the management of NeuroAIDS.

Authors:  Madhavan Nair; Rahul Dev Jayant; Ajeet Kaushik; Vidya Sagar
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  A High-Throughput, Arbitrary-Waveform, MPI Spectrometer and Relaxometer for Comprehensive Magnetic Particle Optimization and Characterization.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Patrick W Goodwill; Daniel W Hensley; Laura A Taylor; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.