Literature DB >> 26022439

High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stents: image quality and radiation doses for low voltage (100 kVp) and standard voltage (120 kVp) ECG-triggered scanning.

Ji Won Lee1, Chang Won Kim, Han Cheol Lee, Ming-Ting Wu, Lee Hwangbo, Ki Seok Choo, June Hong Kim, Ki-Nam Lee, Jin You Kim, Yeon Joo Jeong.   

Abstract

The noninvasive assessment of coronary stents by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an attractive method. However, the radiation dose associated with CCTA remains a concern for patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiation doses and image qualities of CCTA performed using tube voltages of 100 or 120 kVp for the evaluation of coronary stents. After receiving institutional review board approval, 53 consecutive patients with previously implanted stents (101 stents) underwent 64-slice CCTA. Patients were divided into three different protocol groups, namely, prospective ECG triggering at 100 kVp, prospective ECG triggering at 120 kVp, or retrospective gating at 100 kVp. Two reviewers qualitatively scored the quality of the resulting images for coronary stents and determined levels of artificial lumen narrowing (ALN), stent lumen attenuation increase ratio (SAIR), image noise, and radiation dose parameters. No significant differences were found between the three protocol groups concerning qualitative image quality or SAIR. Coronary lumen attenuation and in-stent attenuation of 100 kVp prospective CCTA (P-CCTA) were higher than in the 120 kVp P-CCTA protocol (all Ps < 0.001). Mean ALN was significantly lower for 100 kVp P-CCTA than for 100 kVp retrospective CCTA (R-CCTA, P = 0.007). The mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower (P < 0.001) for 100 kVp P-CCTA (3.3 ± 0.4 mSv) than for the other two protocols (100 kVp R-CCTA 6.7 ± 1.0 mSv, 120 kVp P-CCTA 4.6 ± 1.2 mSv). We conclude that the use of 100 kVp P-CCTA can reduce radiation doses for patients while maintaining the imaging quality of 100 kVp R-CCTA and 120 kVp P-CCTA for the evaluation of coronary stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26022439     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0686-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  29 in total

1.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; G Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study.

Authors:  W-J Yang; Z-L Pan; H Zhang; L-F Pang; Y Guo; K-M Chen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Martine Gilard; Jean Christophe Cornily; Gilles Rioufol; Gerard Finet; Pierre Yves Pennec; Jacques Mansourati; Jean Jacques Blanc; Jacques Boschat
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Cardiac computed tomography technology and dose-reduction strategies.

Authors:  James P Earls; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Noninvasive quantitative evaluation of coronary artery stent patency using 64-row multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Murrad J Abdelkarim; Naser Ahmadi; Ambarish Gopal; Yasmin Hamirani; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-11-27

7.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  F Pugliese; A C Weustink; C Van Mieghem; F Alberghina; M Otsuka; W B Meijboom; N van Pelt; N R Mollet; F Cademartiri; G P Krestin; M G M Hunink; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-11

10.  High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging: a phantom study.

Authors:  Wen Jie Yang; Ke Min Chen; Li Fang Pang; Ying Guo; Jian Ying Li; Huang Zhang; Zi Lai Pan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent restenosis using model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography: initial experience.

Authors:  Fuminari Tatsugami; Toru Higaki; Hiroaki Sakane; Yuko Nakamura; Makoto Iida; Yasutaka Baba; Chikako Fujioka; Atsuhiro Senoo; Toshiro Kitagawa; Hideya Yamamoto; Yasuki Kihara; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Tiong Wei Siong; Ang Wee Chin; Ng Kwan Hoong; Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in low tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Seyedeh Shokoofeh Mousavi-Gazafroudi; Amirreza Sajjadieh-Khajouei; Maryam Moradi; Seyedeh Shabnam Mousavi-Gazafroudi; Ghasem Yadegarfar; Mohammad Bagher Tavakoli
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2019-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.