Literature DB >> 26020577

Cognitive Interviewing: Revising the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory for Use In the Nursing Home.

Kim Curyto, Kimberly S Van Haitsma, Gail L Towsley.   

Abstract

A valid tool is needed to assess preferences that are relevant and important to nursing home (NH) residents. Originally developed for older adults receiving home care services, the authors adapted the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) for use with NH residents. Content validity was initially established using a panel of experts in long-term care. PELI items were cognitively interviewed with 31 Veteran and 39 non-Veteran participants (N = 70). Responses from cognitive interviewing guided substantial revisions of the PELI (>25% of items) to include language that NH residents use and understand, reducing potential measurement error and ensuring the preferences assessed are relevant to NH residents. Future work will further adapt the PELI for use with more diverse groups and health care settings, and assess its psychometric properties. Using the PELI will help move clinical teams closer to the goal of providing person-centered care informed by individual preferences. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020577      PMCID: PMC7990027          DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20150522-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs        ISSN: 1938-2464            Impact factor:   1.571


  30 in total

1.  Effects of individualized versus classical "relaxation" music on the frequency of agitation in elderly persons with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

Authors:  L A Gerdner
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.878

2.  The psychosocial preferences of older adults: a pilot examination of content and structure.

Authors:  B D Carpenter; K Van Haitsma; K Ruckdeschel; M P Lawton
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2000-06

Review 3.  A review of satisfaction instruments used in long-term care settings.

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2007

4.  What the resident meant to say: use of cognitive interviewing techniques to develop questionnaires for nursing home residents.

Authors:  Patricia Housen; George R Shannon; Barbara Simon; Maria Orlando Edelen; Mary P Cadogan; Linda Sohn; Malia Jones; Joan L Buchanan; Debra Saliba
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2008-04

5.  What matters most to nursing home elders: quality of life in the nursing home.

Authors:  Orah R Burack; Audrey S Weiner; Joann P Reinhardt; Rachel A Annunziato
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  The preferences for everyday living inventory: scale development and description of psychosocial preferences responses in community-dwelling elders.

Authors:  Kimberly Van Haitsma; Kimberly Curyto; Abby Spector; Gail Towsley; Morton Kleban; Brian Carpenter; Katy Ruckdeschel; Penny Hollander Feldman; Mary Jane Koren
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-08-30

7.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination.

Authors:  E L Teng; H C Chui
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 8.  Appreciating the 'person' in long-term care.

Authors:  Brendan McCormack; Tonya Roberts; Julienne Meyer; Debra Morgan; Veronique Boscart
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.115

9.  Dressing and grooming: preferences of community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Barbara Jensen
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  Quality of life in nursing homes: results of a qualitative resident survey.

Authors:  Liane Schenk; Roger Meyer; Anja Behr; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Martin Holzhausen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  15 in total

1.  Honoring the Everyday Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Perceived Choice and Satisfaction With Care.

Authors:  Lauren R Bangerter; Allison R Heid; Katherine Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  A Machine Learning Recommender System to Tailor Preference Assessments to Enhance Person-Centered Care Among Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Gerald C Gannod; Katherine M Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Nathan Martindale; Alexandra Heppner
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based advance care plan for dementia.

Authors:  Liza L Behrens; Brianna Morgan; Emily Summerhayes; Sonia Talwar; Vanessa L Burshnic-Neal; Mary Ersek; Nancy Hodgson
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.525

4.  Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Nytasia M Hicks; Allison R Heid; Katherine M Abbott; Kendall Leser; Kimberly VanHaitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  The Change in Nursing Home Residents' Preferences Over Time.

Authors:  Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Morton Kleban; Michael J Rovine; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  "We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.

Authors:  Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  The impact of nursing home residents' characteristics on ratings of importance of autonomy preferences in daily care over time.

Authors:  Allison R Heid; Katherine M Abbott; Morton Kleban; Michael J Rovine; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.658

8.  Preference Consistency: Veteran and Non-Veteran Nursing Home Resident Self-Reported Preferences for Everyday Living.

Authors:  Kimberly Curyto; Leah M Dockler; Kimberly S Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 1.254

9.  Delivering Person-Centered Care: Important Preferences for Recipients of Long-term Services and Supports.

Authors:  Katherine M Abbott; Rachel Klumpp; Kendall A Leser; Jane K Straker; Gerald C Gannod; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.669

10.  Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?

Authors:  Yinfei Duan; Tetyana P Shippee; Weiwen Ng; Odichinma Akosionu; Mark Woodhouse; Haitao Chu; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Joseph E Gaugler; Beth A Virnig; John R Bowblis
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.