Literature DB >> 30836011

The impact of nursing home residents' characteristics on ratings of importance of autonomy preferences in daily care over time.

Allison R Heid1, Katherine M Abbott2, Morton Kleban3, Michael J Rovine4, Kimberly Van Haitsma3,5.   

Abstract

Objective: Nursing home (NH) residents' preferences for everyday living are the foundation for delivering individualized care. Yet, work has not examined the impact of demographic and clinical characteristics of NH residents on the stability of their preferences over time.Method: This study examined the rate of change in reports of importance of 27 autonomy-related everyday preferences from the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory over 3-months and the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with change for nursing home residents (N = 255). Descriptive frequencies and tests of mean difference were utilized to examine differences between individuals reporting change in importance over time compared to those that did not report change.
Results: Autonomy preferences in daily care remained stable over 3-months for the majority of residents. For residents that did report change on autonomy preferences, no systematic associations of demographic or clinical characteristics were found to be associated with change. Rather, change was associated with differential characteristics based on the preference.
Conclusion: This study indicates that knowing a person's demographic or clinical characteristics in care will not uniformly inform a caretaker's understanding of the individual's reports of importance for autonomy related preferences over time. Future work should explore the role of care environment on change in preference ratings over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Person-centered care; autonomy; everyday preferences; nursing home residents

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30836011      PMCID: PMC7138142          DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1584875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Ment Health        ISSN: 1360-7863            Impact factor:   3.658


  32 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Evidence-based guideline. Individualized music for elders with dementia.

Authors:  Linda A Gerdner; Deborah Perry Schoenfelder
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.254

3.  Measuring the values and preferences for everyday care of persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Carol J Whitlatch; Lynn Friss Feinberg; Shandra S Tucke
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-06

4.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

Review 5.  Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Catherine L Auriemma; Christina A Nguyen; Rachel Bronheim; Saida Kent; Shrivatsa Nadiger; Dustin Pardo; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Development and initial validation of a self-report assessment tool for anxiety among older adults: the Geriatric Anxiety Scale.

Authors:  Daniel L Segal; Andrea June; Matthew Payne; Frederick L Coolidge; Brian Yochim
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2010-05-31

7.  "We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.

Authors:  Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 8.  Continence restoration in the cognitively impaired adult.

Authors:  D L Thompson; D A Smith
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.361

9.  Preferences for Everyday Living: Understanding the Impact of Cognitive Status on Preference Importance Ratings in Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Christopher J Carey; Allison R Heid; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.

Authors:  Kimberly Van Haitsma; Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Brian Carpenter; Kimberly Curyto; Morton Kleban; Karen Eshraghi; Christina I Duntzee; Abby Spector
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.254

View more
  3 in total

1.  Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Nytasia M Hicks; Allison R Heid; Katherine M Abbott; Kendall Leser; Kimberly VanHaitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 2.  Wishes and Needs of Nursing Home Residents: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Roxana Schweighart; Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan; Malte Klemmt; Andrea Teti; Silke Neuderth
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?

Authors:  Yinfei Duan; Tetyana P Shippee; Weiwen Ng; Odichinma Akosionu; Mark Woodhouse; Haitao Chu; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Joseph E Gaugler; Beth A Virnig; John R Bowblis
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.802

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.