Literature DB >> 26020439

Three-dimensional Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US Imaging for Early Antiangiogenic Treatment Assessment in a Mouse Colon Cancer Model.

Huaijun Wang1, Dimitre Hristov1, Jiale Qin1, Lu Tian1, Jürgen K Willmann1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) ultrasonographic (US) imaging by using a clinical matrix array transducer to assess early antiangiogenic treatment effects in human colon cancer xenografts in mice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal studies were approved by the Institutional Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care at Stanford University. Three-dimensional DCE US imaging with two techniques (bolus and destruction-replenishment) was performed in human colon cancer xenografts (n = 38) by using a clinical US system and transducer. Twenty-one mice were imaged twice to assess reproducibility. Seventeen mice were scanned before and 24 hours after either antiangiogenic (n = 9) or saline-only (n = 8) treatment. Data sets of 3D DCE US examinations were retrospectively segmented into consecutive 1-mm imaging planes to simulate two-dimensional (2D) DCE US imaging. Six perfusion parameters (peak enhancement [PE], area under the time-intensity curve [AUC], time to peak [TTP], relative blood volume [rBV], relative blood flow [rBF], and blood flow velocity) were measured on both 3D and 2D data sets. Percent area of blood vessels was quantified ex vivo with immunofluorescence. Statistical analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon rank test by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and by using Pearson correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Reproducibility of both 3D DCE US imaging techniques was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73-0.86). PE, AUC, rBV, and rBF significantly decreased (P ≤ .04) in antiangiogenic versus saline-treated tumors. rBV (r = 0.74; P = .06) and rBF (r = 0.85; P = .02) correlated with ex vivo percent area of blood vessels, although the statistical significance of rBV was not reached, likely because of small sample size. Overall, 2D DCE-US overestimated and underestimated treatment effects from up to 125-fold to170-fold compared with 3D DCE US imaging. If the central tumor plane was assessed, treatment response was underestimated up to threefold or overestimated up to 57-fold on 2D versus 3D DCE US images.
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional DCE US imaging with a clinical matrix array transducer is feasible and reproducible to assess tumor perfusion in human colon cancer xenografts in mice and allows for assessment of early treatment response after antiangiogenic therapy. © RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020439      PMCID: PMC4627439          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Christian Greis
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion.

Authors:  C F Dietrich; M A Averkiou; J-M Correas; N Lassau; E Leen; F Piscaglia
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic parametric perfusion imaging in the evaluation of antiangiogenic tumor treatment.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Zhou; Wei Zheng; Long-Hui Cao; Min Liu; Rong-Zhen Luo; Feng Han; Pei-Hong Wu; An-Hua Li
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Quantitative mapping of tumor vascularity using volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt; Anna Sorace; Reshu Saini
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jaafar Bennouna; Javier Sastre; Dirk Arnold; Pia Österlund; Richard Greil; Eric Van Cutsem; Roger von Moos; Jose Maria Viéitez; Olivier Bouché; Christophe Borg; Claus-Christoph Steffens; Vicente Alonso-Orduña; Christoph Schlichting; Irmarie Reyes-Rivera; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Thierry André; Stefan Kubicka
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Response evaluation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: RECIST version 1.1 versus modified CT criteria.

Authors:  Woo-Suk Chung; Mi-Suk Park; Sang Joon Shin; Song-Ee Baek; Yeo-Eun Kim; Jin Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with conventional and antiangiogenetic chemotherapy: evaluation with liver computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Michele Anzidei; Alessandro Napoli; Fulvio Zaccagna; Gaia Cartocci; Luca Saba; Guendalina Menichini; Beatrice Cavallo Marincola; Beatrice Cavallo Marincola; Eugenio Marotta; Luisa Di Mare; Carlo Catalano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Dynamic microbubble contrast-enhanced US to measure tumor response to targeted therapy: a proposed clinical protocol with results from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Ross Williams; John M Hudson; Brendan A Lloyd; Ahthavan R Sureshkumar; Gordon Lueck; Laurent Milot; Mostafa Atri; Georg A Bjarnason; Peter N Burns
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Three-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Anush Sridharan; Priscilla Machado; Hongjia Zhao; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Jaydev K Dave; Ji-Bin Liu; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Kirk Wallace; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Quantitative assessment of tumor blood flow changes in a murine breast cancer model after adriamycin chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced destruction-replenishment sonography.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Wang; Wei Zheng; Yao Chen; Long-Hui Cao; Rong-Zhen Luo; An-Hua Li; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  13 in total

1.  Intra-Animal Comparison between Three-dimensional Molecularly Targeted US and Three-dimensional Dynamic Contrast-enhanced US for Early Antiangiogenic Treatment Assessment in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Amelie M Lutz; Dimitre Hristov; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Assessment of angiogenesis in rabbit orthotropic liver tumors using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with two-dimensional DCE-US.

Authors:  Qiao Zheng; Jian-Chao Zhang; Zhu Wang; Si-Min Ruan; Wei Li; Fu-Shun Pan; Li-Da Chen; Yu-Chen Zhang; Wen-Xin Wu; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Quan-Yuan Shan; Wei Wang
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Early prediction of tumor response to bevacizumab treatment in murine colon cancer models using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhou; Huiping Zhang; Huaijun Wang; Amelie M Lutz; Ahmed El Kaffas; Lu Tian; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 9.596

4.  In vitro characterization and in vivo ultrasound molecular imaging of nucleolin-targeted microbubbles.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Elizabeth S Ingham; M Karen J Gagnon; Lisa M Mahakian; Jingfei Liu; Josquin L Foiret; Juergen K Willmann; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Multimodal Genetic Approach for Molecular Imaging of Vasculature in a Mouse Model of Melanoma.

Authors:  Giselle A Suero-Abreu; Orlando Aristizábal; Benjamin B Bartelle; Eugenia Volkova; Joe J Rodríguez; Daniel H Turnbull
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Use of 3-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Evaluate Tumor Microvasculature After Nanoparticle-Mediated Modulation.

Authors:  Jihun Kwon; Rajalekha M Rajamahendiran; Needa A Virani; Sijumon Kunjachan; Erin Snay; Max Harlacher; Marios Myronakis; Shinichi Shimizu; Hiroki Shirato; Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Ryan Gessner; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Colorectal Liver Metastases as an Imaging Modality for Early Response Prediction to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marie Benzon Mogensen; Martin Lundsgaard Hansen; Birthe Merete Henriksen; Thomas Axelsen; Ben Vainer; Kell Osterlind; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-12

8.  Biodegradable nanotheranostics with hyperthermia-induced bubble ability for ultrasound imaging-guided chemo-photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Changsong Xu; Feng Gao; Jianrong Wu; Shiwei Niu; Fan Li; Lifang Jin; Qiusheng Shi; Lianfang Du
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-09-03

9.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: First-In-Human Pilot Study in Patients with Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Rosa Maria Silveira Sigrist; George Fisher; Sunitha Bachawal; Joy Liau; Huaijun Wang; Alexander Karanany; Isabelle Durot; Jarrett Rosenberg; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Spatial Characterization of Tumor Perfusion Properties from 3D DCE-US Perfusion Maps are Early Predictors of Cancer Treatment Response.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Assaf Hoogi; Jianhua Zhou; Isabelle Durot; Huaijun Wang; Jarrett Rosenberg; Albert Tseng; Hersh Sagreiya; Alireza Akhbardeh; Daniel L Rubin; Aya Kamaya; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.