Literature DB >> 21555352

Dynamic microbubble contrast-enhanced US to measure tumor response to targeted therapy: a proposed clinical protocol with results from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy.

Ross Williams1, John M Hudson, Brendan A Lloyd, Ahthavan R Sureshkumar, Gordon Lueck, Laurent Milot, Mostafa Atri, Georg A Bjarnason, Peter N Burns.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and implement an evidence-based protocol for characterizing vascular response of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to targeted therapy by using dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) ultrasonography (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional research ethics board; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Seventeen patients (four women; median age, 58 years; range, 42-72 years; 13 men, median age, 62 years; range, 45-81 years) with metastatic RCC were examined by using DCE US before and after 2 weeks of treatment with sunitinib (May 2007 to October 2009). Two contrast agent techniques--bolus injection and disruption-replenishment infusion of microbubbles--were compared. Changes in tumor blood velocity and fractional blood volume were measured with both methods, together with reproducibility and effect of compensation for respiratory motion. Tumor changes were assessed with computed tomography, by using the best response with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and progression-free survival (PFS). Follow-up RECIST measurements were performed at 6-week intervals until progressive disease was detected.
RESULTS: In response to treatment, median tumor fractional blood volume measured with the disruption-replenishment infusion method decreased by 73.2% (interquartile range, 46%-87%) (P < .002), with repeated-measure reproducibility of 9%-15%. Significant decreases were also seen with the bolus method, but with poor correlation of changes in bolus peak (r = 0.46, P = .066) and area under the curve (r = 0.47, P = .058), compared with infusion measurements. Changes in DCE US parameters over 2 weeks did not correlate with PFS and could not be used to predict long-term assessment of best response by using RECIST. Follow-up times ranged 28-501 days; the median was 164 days.
CONCLUSION: DCE US provides reproducible and sensitive assessment of vascular changes in response to antiangiogenic therapy. The disruption-replenishment infusion protocol is a flexible method suitable for many tumor types, but further studies are needed to assess whether this protocol may be predictive of patient outcome. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21555352     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  36 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: role of state-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Venkata S Katabathina; Nathalie Lassau; Ivan Pedrosa; Chaan S Ng; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound assessment of the vascular effects of novel therapeutics in early stage trials.

Authors:  Edward Leen; Michalakis Averkiou; Marcel Arditi; Peter Burns; Daniela Bokor; Thomas Gauthier; Yuko Kono; Olivier Lucidarme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis using real-time motion-compensated contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Marybeth A Pysz; Ismayil Guracar; Kira Foygel; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 9.596

4.  Correlation of ultrasound contrast agent derived blood flow parameters with immunohistochemical angiogenesis markers in murine xenograft tumor models.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Christian C Wilson; Raymond J Ro; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys and adrenals in children.

Authors:  Susan J Back; Patricia T Acharya; Richard D Bellah; Harris L Cohen; Kassa Darge; Annamaria Deganello; Zoltan Harkanyi; Damjana Ključevšek; Aikaterini Ntoulia; Harriet J Paltiel; Maciej Piskunowicz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  Contrast ultrasound imaging for identification of early responder tumor models to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Molly L Flexman; Fotois Vlachos; Jianzhong Huang; Sonia L Hernandez; Hyun Keol Kim; Tessa B Johung; Jeffrey W Gander; Ari R Reichstein; Brooke S Lampl; Antai Wang; Andreas H Hielscher; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Imaging techniques as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Nathan; Anup Vinayan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 8.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Authors:  Michael Ingrisch; Steven Sourbron
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Early prediction of tumor response to bevacizumab treatment in murine colon cancer models using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhou; Huiping Zhang; Huaijun Wang; Amelie M Lutz; Ahmed El Kaffas; Lu Tian; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 9.596

10.  Evaluation of sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kazue Shiozawa; Manabu Watanabe; Yoshinori Kikuchi; Takahide Kudo; Kenichi Maruyama; Yasukiyo Sumino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.