Literature DB >> 26019225

CD15 Expression Does Not Identify a Phenotypically or Genetically Distinct Glioblastoma Population.

Emma Kenney-Herbert1, Talal Al-Mayhani2, Sara G M Piccirillo2, Joanna Fowler2, Inmaculada Spiteri2, Philip Jones2, Colin Watts1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: : Recent research has focused on the hypothesis that the growth and regeneration of glioblastoma (GB) is sustained by a subpopulation of self-renewing stem-like cells. This has led to the prediction that molecular markers for cancer stem cells in GB may provide a treatment target. One candidate marker is CD15: we wanted to determine if CD15 represented a credible stem cell marker in GB. We first demonstrated that CD15-positive (CD15+) cells were less proliferative than their CD15-negative (CD15-) counterparts in 10 patient GB tumors. Next we compared the proliferative activity of CD15+ and CD15- cells in vitro using tumor-initiating primary GB cell lines (TICs) and found no difference in proliferative behavior. Furthermore, TICs sorted for CD15+ and CD15- were not significantly different cytogenetically or in terms of gene expression profile. Sorted single CD15+ and CD15- cells were equally capable of reconstituting a heterogeneous population containing both CD15+ and CD15- cells over time, and both CD15+ and CD15- cells were able to generate tumors in vivo. No difference was found in the phenotypic or genomic behavior of CD15+ cells compared with CD15- cells from the same patient. Moreover, we found that in vitro, cells were able to interconvert between the CD15+ and CD15- states. Our data challenge the utility of CD15 as a cancer stem cell marker. SIGNIFICANCE: The data from this study contribute to the ongoing debate about the role of cancer stem cells in gliomagenesis. Results showed that CD15, a marker previously thought to be a cancer stem-like marker in glioblastoma, could not isolate a phenotypically or genetically distinct population. Moreover, isolated CD15-positive and -negative cells were able to generate mixed populations of glioblastoma cells in vitro. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD15; Cancer; Glioblastoma; Hierarchy; SSEA1; Stem cell

Year:  2015        PMID: 26019225      PMCID: PMC4479614          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  77 in total

Review 1.  An 'oligarchy' rules neural development.

Authors:  David H Rowitch; Q Richard Lu; Nicoletta Kessaris; William D Richardson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Rapid immunocytochemical analysis of acute leukemias.

Authors:  R D Hammer; R D Collins; S Ebrahimi; T T Casey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Howard Colman; Li Zhang; Erik P Sulman; J Matthew McDonald; Nasrin Latif Shooshtari; Andreana Rivera; Sonya Popoff; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis; J Gregory Cairncross; Mark R Gilbert; Heidi S Phillips; Minesh P Mehta; Arnab Chakravarti; Christopher E Pelloski; Krishna Bhat; Burt G Feuerstein; Robert B Jenkins; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  CD133, CD15/SSEA-1, CD34 or side populations do not resume tumor-initiating properties of long-term cultured cancer stem cells from human malignant glio-neuronal tumors.

Authors:  Cristina Patru; Luciana Romao; Pascale Varlet; Laure Coulombel; Eric Raponi; Josette Cadusseau; François Renault-Mihara; Cécile Thirant; Nadine Leonard; Alain Berhneim; Maria Mihalescu-Maingot; Jacques Haiech; Ivan Bièche; Vivaldo Moura-Neto; Catherine Daumas-Duport; Marie-Pierre Junier; Hervé Chneiweiss
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Dominik Sturm; Hendrik Witt; Volker Hovestadt; Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; David T W Jones; Carolin Konermann; Elke Pfaff; Martje Tönjes; Martin Sill; Sebastian Bender; Marcel Kool; Marc Zapatka; Natalia Becker; Manuela Zucknick; Thomas Hielscher; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Marina Ryzhova; Steffen Albrecht; Karine Jacob; Marietta Wolter; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Timothy van Meter; Michael C Frühwald; Holger Hauch; Arnulf Pekrun; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Tim Niehues; Gregor von Komorowski; Matthias Dürken; Andreas E Kulozik; Jenny Madden; Andrew Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Rachid Drissi; Maryam Fouladi; Wolfram Scheurlen; Andreas von Deimling; Camelia Monoranu; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Christof M Kramm; Jörg Felsberg; Christian Hartmann; Benedikt Wiestler; Wolfgang Wick; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Anders M Lindroth; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Damien Faury; Adam Fleming; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Pawel P Liberski; Krzysztof Zakrzewski; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Sorana Morrissy; Florence Cavalli; Michael D Taylor; Peter van Sluis; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Richard Volckmann; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Guido Reifenberger; V Peter Collins; Jacek Majewski; Andrey Korshunov; Peter Lichter; Christoph Plass; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution.

Authors:  Mark Shackleton; Elsa Quintana; Eric R Fearon; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Tumor growth need not be driven by rare cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Priscilla N Kelly; Aleksandar Dakic; Jerry M Adams; Stephen L Nutt; Andreas Strasser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  CD44 mediates human glioma cell adhesion and invasion in vitro.

Authors:  A Merzak; S Koocheckpour; G J Pilkington
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Correlation between the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index and the MIB-1 and Ki-67 proliferating cell indices in cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  K Onda; R L Davis; M Shibuya; C B Wilson; T Hoshino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  A review of the role of stem cells in the development and treatment of glioma.

Authors:  Richard M Heywood; Hani J Marcus; David J Ryan; Sara G M Piccirillo; Talal M Fael Al-Mayhani; Colin Watts
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  9 in total

1.  TGFβ-Responsive HMOX1 Expression Is Associated with Stemness and Invasion in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Dhiman Ghosh; Ilya V Ulasov; LiPing Chen; Lualhati E Harkins; Karolina Wallenborg; Parvinder Hothi; Steven Rostad; Leroy Hood; Charles S Cobbs
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Their Potential Application in Transplantation.

Authors:  Joseph R Scalea; Young Suk Lee; Eduardo Davila; Jonathan S Bromberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Temozolomide-induced increase of tumorigenicity can be diminished by targeting of mitochondria in in vitro models of patient individual glioblastoma.

Authors:  Doreen William; Madlin Walther; Björn Schneider; Michael Linnebacher; Carl Friedrich Classen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stem cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment.

Authors:  Anne Dirkse; Anna Golebiewska; Thomas Buder; Petr V Nazarov; Arnaud Muller; Suresh Poovathingal; Nicolaas H C Brons; Sonia Leite; Nicolas Sauvageot; Dzjemma Sarkisjan; Mathieu Seyfrid; Sabrina Fritah; Daniel Stieber; Alessandro Michelucci; Frank Hertel; Christel Herold-Mende; Francisco Azuaje; Alexander Skupin; Rolf Bjerkvig; Andreas Deutsch; Anja Voss-Böhme; Simone P Niclou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Understanding Glioblastoma Biomarkers: Knocking a Mountain with a Hammer.

Authors:  Malak Hassn Mesrati; Amir Barzegar Behrooz; Asmaa Y Abuhamad; Amir Syahir
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  The adaptive transition of glioblastoma stem cells and its implications on treatments.

Authors:  Zeyu Wang; Hao Zhang; Shengchao Xu; Zhixiong Liu; Quan Cheng
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-03-23

7.  Phenotyping clonal populations of glioma stem cell reveals a high degree of plasticity in response to changes of microenvironment.

Authors:  James A Innes; Andrew S Lowe; Raquel Fonseca; Natasha Aley; Tedani El-Hassan; Myrianni Constantinou; Joanne Lau; Ayad Eddaoudi; Silvia Marino; Sebastian Brandner
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 8.  Opportunities and challenges of glioma organoids.

Authors:  Xiangdong Xu; Lingfei Li; Linting Luo; Lingling Shu; Xiaoli Si; Zhenzhen Chen; Wenqing Xia; Jinyu Huang; Yang Liu; Anwen Shao; Yiquan Ke
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 9.  Cancer cell heterogeneity and plasticity: A paradigm shift in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yahaya A Yabo; Simone P Niclou; Anna Golebiewska
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 13.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.