| Literature DB >> 26018448 |
Cristina Valente1,2, Luis Alvarez3, Sarah J Marks4, Ana M Lopez-Parra5, Walther Parson6,7, Ockie Oosthuizen8, Erica Oosthuizen9, António Amorim10,11, Cristian Capelli12, Eduardo Arroyo-Pardo13, Leonor Gusmão14,15, Maria J Prata16,17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the most important dietary shifts underwent by human populations began to occur in the Neolithic, during which new modes of subsistence emerged and new nutrients were introduced in diets. This change might have worked as a selective pressure over the metabolic pathways involved in the breakdown of substances extracted from food. Here we applied a candidate gene approach to investigate whether in populations with different modes of subsistence, diet-related genetic adaptations could be identified in the genes AGXT, PLRP2, MTRR, NAT2 and CYP3A5.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26018448 PMCID: PMC4445807 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0212-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Derived allele frequencies
| POPULATION | c.32C > T | c.1074G > A ( | c.1130A > G ( | c.191G > A ( | c.341 T > C ( | c.590G > A ( | c.857G > A ( | c.219-237G > A ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANG | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.3261 ± 0.0691 | 0.5294 ± 0.0856 | 0.1522 ± 0.0530 | 0.2046 ± 0.0748 | 0.3636 ± 0.0725 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.2400 ± 0.0604 |
| EQG | 0.0482 ± 0.0166 | 0.3214 ± 0.0360 | 0.3563 ± 0.0363 | 0.0977 ± 0.0225 | 0.3588 ± 0.0536 | 0.1786 ± 0.0296 | 0.0233 ± 0.0115 | 0.1429 ± 0.0270 |
| MOZ | 0.0370 ± 0.0257 | 0.2333 ± 0.0546 | 0.5500 ± 0.0642 | 0.1429 ± 0.0540 | 0.2500 ± 0.0884 | 0.2857 ± 0.0697 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.1167 ± 0.0414 |
| UGN | 0.0727 ± 0.01751 | 0.3945 ± 0.0331 | 0.3835 ± 0.0339 | 0.0699 ± 0.0187 | 0.3902 ± 0.0575 | 0.3085 ± 0.0337 | 0.0055 ± 0.0055 | 0.2336 ± 0.0289 |
| BPY | 0.0147 ± 0.0146 | 0.18912 ± 0.0455 | 0.3846 ± 0.0551 | 0.0263 ± 0.0184 | 0.1842 ± 0.0536 | 0.2568 ± 0.0508 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.1447 ± 0.0404 |
| KNA | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0242 ± 0.0138 | 0.1371 ± 0.0309 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0656 ± 0.0239 | 0.0484 ± 0.0193 | 0.0968 ± 0.0266 | 0.2097 ± 0.0366 |
| PTG | 0.1915 ± 0.0406 | 0.5106 ± 0.0516 | 0.1383 ± 0.0356 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.5000 ± 0.0903 | 0.2021 ± 0.0414 | 0.0532 ± 0.0232 | 0.9022 ± 0.03010 |
Populations’ abbreviations as referred in material and methods section
Fig. 1Allele frequencies and MDS plot for PLRP2. P values of ANOVA One-Way test in (A) African + Eurasian and (B) African populations’ group; MDS plot of pairwise genetic distances between populations (C). In the MDS plot different colors represent distinct lifestyles: hunter-gatherers (orange), herders (blue) and farmers populations (black). *populations addressed in this study. Populations’ abbreviations are referred in Material and Methods section
Fig. 2Allele frequencies for NAT2. P values of ANOVA One-Way test in (A) worldwide and (B) African populations’ group hunter-gatherers (orange), herders (blue) and farmers populations (black), *populations addressed in this study. Populations’ abbreviations are referred in material and methods section
Fig. 3Distribution of CYP3A5*3 in Africa and Eurasia and correlation with latitude. Correlation plot between latitude and allele frequencies in African (open dots), European (black dots) and Asian populations (grey dots) (A). Map representing the distribution of CYP3A5*3 across Africa and Eurasia (B). ancestral allele frequency (light pie) and the derived allele (dark pie); hunter-gatherers (orange pie), herders (blue pie) and farmers populations (black pie), *populations addressed in this study
AMOVA analysis under different criteria
| c.32C > T ( |
| c.1074G > A ( |
| c.1130A > G ( |
| c.590G > A ( |
| c.219-237G > A ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.6 | 0.8793 |
|
| 4.9 | 0.0542 |
|
| 0.4 | 0.1478 |
|
| −0.2 | 0.4712 |
|
| 2.5 | 0.1004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.2 | 0.2149 |
| 0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant differences are highlighted in bold
Fig. 4Joint distribution of F ST vs. Scaled Heterozygosity expected under two neutral models. Joint distributions in African + Eurasian (A) and African populations (B) under Island Model (IM); and joint distributions in African + Eurasian (C) and African populations (D) under Hierarquical Island Model (HIM). It is represented the 99 % confidence regions of the null distribution. Black dots represent the observed measures in the studied genes, referred for simplicity as uniquely by their gene symbols; significant differences after Bonferroni’s correction for multiple tests are highlighted in bold
Linkage Disequilibrium including D’ and r parameters
| Gene (target SNP) | Non-synonymous SNP |
|
| Gene location | DNA changes | Functional consequences | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| rs2305204 | 1.0 | 0.036 |
| c.1242G > C | - | [ |
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| rs1049125 | 0.884 | 0.052 |
| c.1382 T > C | - | [ | |
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| rs4751996 | 0.981 | 0.962 |
| c.1084G > A | - | [ | |
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
|
| rs1801280 | n.d. | n.d. |
| c.341 T > C | Associated with slow acetylator due to N-acetyltransferase enzyme variant (acetylation slow phenotype) | [ |
| 1.0 | 0.142 | [ | |||||
| n.d. | n.d. | [ | |||||
| rs1208 | n.d. | n.d. |
| c.803G > A | [ | ||
| 1.0 | 0.360 | [ | |||||
| n.d. | n.d. | [ |
n.d. no data available