Albrecht W Popp1, Salome Meer1, Marc-Antoine Krieg2, Romain Perrelet1, Didier Hans2, Kurt Lippuner3. 1. Department of Osteoporosis, University Hospital and University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. 2. Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. Department of Osteoporosis, University Hospital and University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. kurt.lippuner@insel.ch.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of the vertebral trabecular bone score (TBS) alone or in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) with regard to fracture risk. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the relative contribution of BMD [measured at the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS)] and TBS with regard to the risk of incident clinical fractures in a representative cohort of elderly post-menopausal women previously participating in the Swiss Evaluation of the Methods of Measurement of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk study. RESULTS: Complete datasets were available for 556 of 701 women (79 %). Mean age 76.1 years, LS BMD 0.863 g/cm2, and TBS 1.195. LS BMD and LS TBS were moderately correlated (r 2 = 0.25). After a mean of 2.7 ± 0.8 years of follow-up, the incidence of fragility fractures was 9.4 %. Age- and BMI-adjusted hazard ratios per standard deviation decrease (95 % confidence intervals) were 1.58 (1.16-2.16), 1.77 (1.31-2.39), and 1.59 (1.21-2.09) for LS, FN, and TH BMD, respectively, and 2.01 (1.54-2.63) for TBS. Whereas 58 and 60 % of fragility fractures occurred in women with BMD T score ≤-2.5 and a TBS <1.150, respectively, combining these two thresholds identified 77 % of all women with an osteoporotic fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine TBS alone or in combination with BMD predicted incident clinical fracture risk in a representative population-based sample of elderly post-menopausal women.
PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of the vertebral trabecular bone score (TBS) alone or in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) with regard to fracture risk. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the relative contribution of BMD [measured at the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS)] and TBS with regard to the risk of incident clinical fractures in a representative cohort of elderly post-menopausal women previously participating in the Swiss Evaluation of the Methods of Measurement of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk study. RESULTS: Complete datasets were available for 556 of 701 women (79 %). Mean age 76.1 years, LS BMD 0.863 g/cm2, and TBS 1.195. LS BMD and LS TBS were moderately correlated (r 2 = 0.25). After a mean of 2.7 ± 0.8 years of follow-up, the incidence of fragility fractures was 9.4 %. Age- and BMI-adjusted hazard ratios per standard deviation decrease (95 % confidence intervals) were 1.58 (1.16-2.16), 1.77 (1.31-2.39), and 1.59 (1.21-2.09) for LS, FN, and TH BMD, respectively, and 2.01 (1.54-2.63) for TBS. Whereas 58 and 60 % of fragility fractures occurred in women with BMD T score ≤-2.5 and a TBS <1.150, respectively, combining these two thresholds identified 77 % of all women with an osteoporotic fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine TBS alone or in combination with BMD predicted incident clinical fracture risk in a representative population-based sample of elderly post-menopausal women.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis; Trabecular bone score
Authors: Neil Binkley; Gary M Kiebzak; E Michael Lewiecki; Diane Krueger; Ronald E Gangnon; Paul D Miller; John A Shepherd; Marc K Drezner Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-11-16 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Marc-Antoine Krieg; Jacques Cornuz; Christiane Ruffieux; Guy Van Melle; Daniel Büche; Maximilian A Dambacher; Didier Hans; Florian Hartl; Hansjorg J Häuselmann; Marius Kraenzlin; Kurt Lippuner; Maurus Neff; Pierro Pancaldi; Rene Rizzoli; Franco Tanzi; Robert Theiler; Alan Tyndall; Claus Wimpfheimer; Peter Burckhardt Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J A Kanis; F Borgström; J Compston; K Dreinhöfer; E Nolte; L Jonsson; W F Lems; E V McCloskey; R Rizzoli; J Stenmark Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kyla L Naylor; Jerilynn Prior; Amit X Garg; Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Jonathan D Adachi; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Robert G Josse; William D Leslie Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Gail A Greendale; MeiHua Huang; Jane A Cauley; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Arun S Karlamangla Journal: Bone Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Joao Pedro Pinho; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Arnaldo Jose Hernandez; Egidio Lima Dorea; Bruno Mezencio; Liliam Takayama; Jackeline Couto Alvarenga; Julio Cerca Serrao; Alberto Carlos Amadio Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: N C Harvey; C C Glüer; N Binkley; E V McCloskey; M-L Brandi; C Cooper; D Kendler; O Lamy; A Laslop; B M Camargos; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis Journal: Bone Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 4.398