Literature DB >> 24030479

SCOPE: a scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe.

J A Kanis1, F Borgström, J Compston, K Dreinhöfer, E Nolte, L Jonsson, W F Lems, E V McCloskey, R Rizzoli, J Stenmark.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The scorecard summarises key indicators of the burden of osteoporosis and its management in each of the member states of the European Union. The resulting scorecard elements were then assembled on a single sheet to provide a unique overview of osteoporosis in Europe.
INTRODUCTION: The scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe (SCOPE) is an independent project that seeks to raise awareness of osteoporosis care in Europe. The aim of this project was to develop a scorecard and background documents to draw attention to gaps and inequalities in the provision of primary and secondary prevention of fractures due to osteoporosis.
METHODS: The SCOPE panel reviewed the information available on osteoporosis and the resulting fractures for each of the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27). The information researched covered four domains: background information (e.g. the burden of osteoporosis and fractures), policy framework, service provision and service uptake e.g. the proportion of men and women at high risk that do not receive treatment (the treatment gap).
RESULTS: There was a marked difference in fracture risk among the EU27. Of concern was the marked heterogeneity in the policy framework, service provision and service uptake for osteoporotic fracture that bore little relation to the fracture burden. For example, despite the wide availability of treatments to prevent fractures, in the majority of the EU27, only a minority of patients at high risk receive treatment for osteoporosis even after their first fracture. The elements of each domain in each country were scored and coded using a traffic light system (red, orange, green) and used to synthesise a scorecard. The resulting scorecard elements were then assembled on a single sheet to provide a unique overview of osteoporosis in Europe.
CONCLUSIONS: The scorecard will enable healthcare professionals and policy makers to assess their country's general approach to the disease and provide indicators to inform future provision of healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030479      PMCID: PMC3880480          DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0144-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  53 in total

Review 1.  Deprescribing Benzodiazepines in Older Patients: Impact of Interventions Targeting Physicians, Pharmacists, and Patients.

Authors:  Brendan J Ng; David G Le Couteur; Sarah N Hilmer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  [Thoracolumbar spinal fractures in the elderly : Classification and treatment].

Authors:  K J Schnake; P Bula; U J Spiegl; M Müller; F Hartmann; B W Ullrich; T R Blattert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds in seven Latin American countries.

Authors:  P Clark; E Denova-Gutiérrez; C Zerbini; A Sanchez; O Messina; J J Jaller; C Campusano; C H Orces; G Riera; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Telementoring: a novel approach to reducing the osteoporosis treatment gap.

Authors:  E M Lewiecki; J F Boyle; S Arora; M F Bouchonville; D H Chafey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  The interactions between municipal socioeconomic status and age on hip fracture risk.

Authors:  C M Oliveira; T Economou; T Bailey; D Mendonça; M F Pina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Osteocrinology.

Authors:  S Kalra; S Bhattacharya; A Joshi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The incidence of hip fractures in Estonia, 2005-2012.

Authors:  M Jürisson; S Vorobjov; R Kallikorm; M Lember; A Uusküla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  C-H Wu; I-J Kao; W-C Hung; S-C Lin; H-C Liu; M-H Hsieh; S Bagga; M Achra; T-T Cheng; R-S Yang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.