OBJECTIVE: Conventional inverse-scattering algorithms for microwave breast imaging result in moderate resolution images with blurred boundaries between tissues. Recent 2-D numerical microwave imaging studies demonstrate that the use of a level set method preserves dielectric boundaries, resulting in a more accurate, higher resolution reconstruction of the dielectric properties distribution. Previously proposed level set algorithms are computationally expensive, and thus, impractical in 3-D. In this paper, we present a computationally tractable 3-D microwave imaging algorithm based on level sets. METHODS: We reduce the computational cost of the level set method using a Jacobian matrix, rather than an adjoint method, to calculate Frechet derivatives. We demonstrate the feasibility of 3-D imaging using simulated array measurements from 3-D numerical breast phantoms. We evaluate performance by comparing full 3-D reconstructions to those from a conventional microwave imaging technique. We also quantitatively assess the efficacy of our algorithm in evaluating breast density. RESULTS: Our reconstructions of 3-D numerical breast phantoms improve upon those of a conventional microwave imaging technique. The density estimates from our level set algorithm are more accurate than those of the conventional microwave imaging, and the accuracy is greater than that reported for mammographic density estimation. CONCLUSION: Our level set method leads to a feasible level of computational complexity for full 3-D imaging, and reconstructs the heterogeneous dielectric properties distribution of the breast more accurately than conventional microwave imaging methods. SIGNIFICANCE: 3-D microwave breast imaging using a level set method is a promising low-cost, nonionizing alternative to current breast imaging techniques.
OBJECTIVE: Conventional inverse-scattering algorithms for microwave breast imaging result in moderate resolution images with blurred boundaries between tissues. Recent 2-D numerical microwave imaging studies demonstrate that the use of a level set method preserves dielectric boundaries, resulting in a more accurate, higher resolution reconstruction of the dielectric properties distribution. Previously proposed level set algorithms are computationally expensive, and thus, impractical in 3-D. In this paper, we present a computationally tractable 3-D microwave imaging algorithm based on level sets. METHODS: We reduce the computational cost of the level set method using a Jacobian matrix, rather than an adjoint method, to calculate Frechet derivatives. We demonstrate the feasibility of 3-D imaging using simulated array measurements from 3-D numerical breast phantoms. We evaluate performance by comparing full 3-D reconstructions to those from a conventional microwave imaging technique. We also quantitatively assess the efficacy of our algorithm in evaluating breast density. RESULTS: Our reconstructions of 3-D numerical breast phantoms improve upon those of a conventional microwave imaging technique. The density estimates from our level set algorithm are more accurate than those of the conventional microwave imaging, and the accuracy is greater than that reported for mammographic density estimation. CONCLUSION: Our level set method leads to a feasible level of computational complexity for full 3-D imaging, and reconstructs the heterogeneous dielectric properties distribution of the breast more accurately than conventional microwave imaging methods. SIGNIFICANCE: 3-D microwave breast imaging using a level set method is a promising low-cost, nonionizing alternative to current breast imaging techniques.
Authors: Olga Pawluczyk; Bindu J Augustine; Martin J Yaffe; Dan Rico; Jiwei Yang; Gordon E Mawdsley; Norman F Boyd Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Saskia van Engeland; Peter R Snoeren; Henkjan Huisman; Carla Boetes; Nico Karssemeijer Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Mariya Lazebnik; Leah McCartney; Dijana Popovic; Cynthia B Watkins; Mary J Lindstrom; Josephine Harter; Sarah Sewall; Anthony Magliocco; John H Booske; Michal Okoniewski; Susan C Hagness Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Mariya Lazebnik; Dijana Popovic; Leah McCartney; Cynthia B Watkins; Mary J Lindstrom; Josephine Harter; Sarah Sewall; Travis Ogilvie; Anthony Magliocco; Tara M Breslin; Walley Temple; Daphne Mew; John H Booske; Michal Okoniewski; Susan C Hagness Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Earl Zastrow; Shakti K Davis; Mariya Lazebnik; Frederick Kelcz; Barry D Van Veen; Susan C Hagness Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Karla Kerlikowske; Laura Ichikawa; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Pamela M Vacek; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Bonnie Yankaskas; Patricia A Carney; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 13.506