Literature DB >> 16524084

Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.

Saskia van Engeland1, Peter R Snoeren, Henkjan Huisman, Carla Boetes, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

A method is presented for estimation of dense breast tissue volume from mammograms obtained with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The thickness of dense tissue mapping to a pixel is determined by using a physical model of image acquisition. This model is based on the assumption that the breast is composed of two types of tissue, fat and parenchyma. Effective linear attenuation coefficients of these tissues are derived from empirical data as a function of tube voltage (kVp), anode material, filtration, and compressed breast thickness. By employing these, tissue composition at a given pixel is computed after performing breast thickness compensation, using a reference value for fatty tissue determined by the maximum pixel value in the breast tissue projection. Validation has been performed using 22 FFDM cases acquired with a GE Senographe 2000D by comparing the volume estimates with volumes obtained by semi-automatic segmentation of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The correlation between MRI and mammography volumes was 0.94 on a per image basis and 0.97 on a per patient basis. Using the dense tissue volumes from MRI data as the gold standard, the average relative error of the volume estimates was 13.6%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16524084     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.862741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  68 in total

1.  Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences.

Authors:  Daniel H-E Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Muqing Lin; Shadfar Bahri; Hon J Yu; Rita S Mehta; Ke Nie; David J B Hsiang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel J Serie; Fang-Fang Wu; Marilyn J Morton; Beth A Schueler; Fergus J Couch; Janet E Olson; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique.

Authors:  Jacob D Shea; Panagiotis Kosmas; Susan C Hagness; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.

Authors:  Said Pertuz; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Authors:  Thomas R Nelson; Laura I Cerviño; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Template-based automatic breast segmentation on MRI by excluding the chest region.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen; Xiaoyong Wang; Siwa Chan; Siping Chen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Consistency of breast density measured from the same women in four different MR scanners.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Yi-Jui Liu; Dah-Cherng Yeh; Chih-Kai Chang; Li-Kuang Chen; Wei-Fan Pan; Chih-Chen Kuo; Muqing Lin; Daniel H E Chang; Peter T Fwu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reproducing two-dimensional mammograms with three-dimensional printed phantoms.

Authors:  Andreu Badal; Matthew Clark; Bahaa Ghammraoui
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-07-12

10.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Man-Kwun I Chau; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Tiffany Tseng; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.