Literature DB >> 26010593

Peripheral processing of gaze.

Joseph Florey1, Colin W G Clifford2, Steven C Dakin3, Isabelle Mareschal1.   

Abstract

When looking at someone, we combine information about their head orientation and eye deviation to judge their direction of gaze. What remains unknown, however, is how these cues combine when we are not looking directly at the person, but rather are using our peripheral vision. Given that peripheral vision helps direct future attention, understanding how we perceive other people's gaze is key to determining their future actions. To examine this, we asked participants to categorize gaze direction in faces whose heads were turned in different directions, and which were viewed using either central or peripheral vision. We report that the weight given to head orientation increases in the periphery, in which forward-facing heads were categorized as "direct" over a wider range of eye deviations than when viewed centrally. When peripheral heads were turned, the number of "direct" responses fell for all gaze deviations with no consistent shift in left-right responses toward the head rotation. For centrally presented heads, head orientation typically repulsed the perceived direction of gaze, and our finding of no consistent shift in responses indicates that such effects are reduced in the periphery. This is not simply the result of poorer spatial resolution in the periphery-other influences, such as crowding and priors for gaze or head direction, may play a role. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010593     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perceiving gaze from head and eye rotations: An integrative challenge for children and adults.

Authors:  Diana Mihalache; Huanghao Feng; Farzaneh Askari; Peter Sokol-Hessner; Eric J Moody; Mohammad H Mahoor; Timothy D Sweeny
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-07-25

3.  The center of attention: Metamers, sensitivity, and bias in the emergent perception of gaze.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A bias-minimising measure of the influence of head orientation on perceived gaze direction.

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assumptions about the positioning of virtual stimuli affect gaze direction estimates during Augmented Reality based interactions.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Tianchang Cheng; Isabelle Mareschal; Duncan Brumby; Simon Julier; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Deconstructing eye contact perception: Measuring perceptual precision and self-referential tendency using an online psychophysical eye contact detection task.

Authors:  Carly A Lasagna; Merranda M McLaughlin; Wisteria Y Deng; Erica L Whiting; Ivy F Tso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

8.  How ubiquitous is the direct-gaze advantage? Evidence for an averted-gaze advantage in a gaze-discrimination task.

Authors:  Eva Riechelmann; Matthias Gamer; Anne Böckler; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Spatial limitations in averaging social cues.

Authors:  Joseph Florey; Colin W G Clifford; Steven Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  How wide is the cone of direct gaze?

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.