PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the acute dose-response relationship of classroom exercise breaks with executive function and math performance in 9- to 12-year-old children by comparing 5-min, 10-min, or 20-min classroom exercise breaks to 10 min of sedentary classroom activity. METHOD: This study used a within-subjects experimental design conducted in the spring of 2012. Ninety-six 4th- and 5th-grade students in 5 classrooms in South Carolina were randomized to receive each of 4 treatments: 5-min, 10-min, or 20-min exercise breaks or 10 min of a sedentary lesson led by research staff. Students completed the Trail-Making Test, an Operational Digit Recall test, and a math fluency test immediately before and after each condition. Planned linear contrasts were used to compare posttest scores between conditions using a repeated-measures mixed model, adjusted for gender, classroom, and the time-varying pretest scores. Potential effect modifiers were added as interaction terms. RESULTS:Math scores were higher after the 10-min and 20-min exercise breaks compared with the sedentary condition (d = 0.24, p = .04, and d = 0.27, p = .02, respectively), and an interaction was observed with gender, IQ, aerobic fitness, and lower engagement in some of the conditions. There were no improvements in executive function tasks. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-min and 20-min classroom exercise break moderately improved math performance in students compared with a seated classroom lesson.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the acute dose-response relationship of classroom exercise breaks with executive function and math performance in 9- to 12-year-old children by comparing 5-min, 10-min, or 20-min classroom exercise breaks to 10 min of sedentary classroom activity. METHOD: This study used a within-subjects experimental design conducted in the spring of 2012. Ninety-six 4th- and 5th-grade students in 5 classrooms in South Carolina were randomized to receive each of 4 treatments: 5-min, 10-min, or 20-min exercise breaks or 10 min of a sedentary lesson led by research staff. Students completed the Trail-Making Test, an Operational Digit Recall test, and a math fluency test immediately before and after each condition. Planned linear contrasts were used to compare posttest scores between conditions using a repeated-measures mixed model, adjusted for gender, classroom, and the time-varying pretest scores. Potential effect modifiers were added as interaction terms. RESULTS: Math scores were higher after the 10-min and 20-min exercise breaks compared with the sedentary condition (d = 0.24, p = .04, and d = 0.27, p = .02, respectively), and an interaction was observed with gender, IQ, aerobic fitness, and lower engagement in some of the conditions. There were no improvements in executive function tasks. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-min and 20-min classroom exercise break moderately improved math performance in students compared with a seated classroom lesson.
Entities:
Keywords:
academic achievement; children; cognition; school
Authors: Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Erik A Willis; Jaehoon Lee; Charles H Hillman; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2019-06-15
Authors: Andy J Daly-Smith; Stephen Zwolinsky; Jim McKenna; Phillip D Tomporowski; Margaret Anne Defeyter; Andrew Manley Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2018-03-27
Authors: Eivind Aadland; Hege Eikeland Tjomsland; Kjersti Johannessen; Ada Kristine Ofrim Nilsen; Geir Kåre Resaland; Øyvind Glosvik; Osvald Lykkebø; Rasmus Stokke; Lars Bo Andersen; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen; Karin Allor Pfeiffer; Phillip D Tomporowski; Ingunn Størksen; John B Bartholomew; Yngvar Ommundsen; Steven James Howard; Anthony D Okely; Katrine Nyvoll Aadland Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-07-03
Authors: Álvaro Infantes-Paniagua; Ana Filipa Silva; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Hugo Sarmento; Francisco Tomás González-Fernández; Sixto González-Víllora; Filipe Manuel Clemente Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: Vera van den Berg; Rosanne Salimi; Renate H M de Groot; Jelle Jolles; Mai J M Chinapaw; Amika S Singh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 3.390