Literature DB >> 26008228

Ribosome-inactivating and related proteins.

Joachim Schrot1, Alexander Weng2, Matthias F Melzig3.   

Abstract

Ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) are toxins that act as N-glycosidases (EC 3.2.2.22). They are mainly produced by plants and classified as type 1 RIPs and type 2 RIPs. There are also RIPs and RIP related proteins that cannot be grouped into the classical type 1 and type 2 RIPs because of their different sizes, structures or functions. In addition, there is still not a uniform nomenclature or classification existing for RIPs. In this review, we give the current status of all known plant RIPs and we make a suggestion about how to unify those RIPs and RIP related proteins that cannot be classified as type 1 or type 2 RIPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N-glycosidase; RIP 1; RIP 2; RIPs; classification of RIPs; nomenclature of RIPs; ribosome-inactivating proteins; type 1 RIP; type 2 RIP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26008228      PMCID: PMC4448163          DOI: 10.3390/toxins7051556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxins (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6651            Impact factor:   4.546


1. Introduction

Because of their N-glycosidase activity, ribosome-inactivating proteins inhibit protein synthesis by cleaving a specific adenine residue (A4324) from the 28S ribosomal RNA of the large 60S subunit of rat ribosomes followed by cell death [1]. In addition, certain RIPs can remove adenine from DNA and other polynucleotides for which reason they are also known as polynucleotide adenosine glycosidases [2]. PAP, an RIP from Phytolacca americana, can cleave not only adenine, but also guanine from the rRNA of Escherichia coli [3]. There are mainly two different types of RIPs: type 1 RIPs (RIP 1) and type 2 RIPs (RIP 2). Type 1 RIPs are single chain proteins, whereas type 2 RIPs consist of two polypeptide chains (A- and B-chain) that are usually linked through a disulfide bridge. The A-chain contains the enzymatic function and the B-chain has lectin properties enabling these proteins to bind to galactose residues on the cell surface. This facilitates the A-chain to enter the cell. Beside these different types of RIPs, there was the proposal to categorize an additional group of RIPs as type 3 RIPs including a protein from maize (b-32) and from barley (JIP60). The protein from maize, b-32, is synthesized as an inactive proenzyme, which is activated after the removal of an internal peptide segment obtaining two segments of 16.5 kDa and 8.5 kDa [4] that seem to act together as N-glycosidase. JIP60 consists of an amino-terminal domain resembling type 1 RIPs linked to a carboxyl-terminal domain, which has a similarity to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E [5,6]. Due to their different structures, these two proteins cannot be grouped into the classical type 1 RIPs. However, the necessity of denominating a new group of RIPs for only these two proteins is not realistic. Therefore, the suggestion was made to consider these two proteins as peculiar type 1 RIPs [7,8]. Beside the N-glycosidases, there is a second kind of RIPs belonging to the RNA hydrolase [9,10]. Both kinds of RIPs strongly inhibit the protein synthesis but show different mechanisms of action. The RNA hydrolases, like α-sarcin as the best-known representative, catalytically cleave a phosphodiester bond between G4325 and A4326 of the rat 28S rRNA. With the exception of crotin II, another representative of the RNA hydrolases (see Section 3.5), these kinds of RIPs are not described in detail in this review. RIPs have mostly been found in plants, but the hypothesis that RIPs are ubiquitous should be discarded, because a gene encoding for an RIP has not been detected in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana [11]. On the other hand, there are plants in which several RIPs occur simultaneously, and recently, it was shown that there are 31 genes in the rice genome encoding for type 1 RIPs [12]. Beside the plant RIPs, a type 1 RIP was also found from the species algae Saccharina japonica, which were denominated as lamjapin [13]. In addition, researchers are also aware of some type 1 RIPs from fungi, such as pleuturegin from Pleurotus tuberregium [14], lyophyllin from Lyophyllum shimeji [15], flammutin and velutin from Flammulina velutipes [16], hypsin and marmorin from Hypsizygus marmoreus [17,18], and volvarin from Volvariella volvaceae [19]. There are also two type 1 RIPs from bacteria: shiga toxin from Shigella dysenteria [20], and verotoxin 1 (shiga-like toxin) from Escherichia coli [21]. At last, adenine glycosylase activity was even found in some mammalian tissues [2]. RIPs show several enzymatic activities, such as chitinase activity [22], superoxide dismutase activity [23], DNase activity [24], and lipase activity [25]. Due to the N-glycosidase activity on viral RNA, RIPs have an antiviral effect, which is considered as a physiological function. But the enzymatic activity could also be related to a role in the defense of plants against predators and fungi [7,8,26]. Because of the N-glycosidase activity on genomic plant DNA, it is also believed that RIPs could play an undefined role in plant senescence [27]. RIPs might also give the plants evolutionary advantages as a kind of protection under unfavorable situations [28]. Anyway, no precise biological role has yet been assigned to RIPs [29], but most of the authors favor the antiviral role. Thus, in agriculture, research was performed to increase the resistance against viruses by using DNA recombinant technology (reviewed in [11]). In medicine, research for treatment of HIV diseases was performed leading to phase II study [30]. But most research of the use of RIPs is aimed at anti-cancer therapy in leading RIPs selectively to malignant tumor cells to be eliminated. Therefore, type 1 RIPs and the A-chains of type 2 RIPs are coupled to antibodies or other targeting moieties like growth factors, other hormones or smaller peptides generating targeted toxins [31,32,33]. These conjugates, however, contain highly potent toxins with a high potential of side effects, because they are partly taken up non-specifically by macrophages or other somatic cells. Another issue regarding the application of these conjugates in an anti-cancer therapy is the response of the immune system, because they are antigens. To reduce at least the high potential of side effects, it is necessary to begin the dosage of these conjugates as low as possible. That seemed to be possible since a synergistic effect of saponins and type 1 RIPs increasing the toxic effect of type 1 RIPs drastically [34,35,36] has been discovered. For that, the saponins must consist of certain molecule units [37], and it has been found that the synergistic effect is not based on stimulating phagocytosis [38], but increasing the endosomal escape in a certain way [39,40]; thus, the type 1 RIPs enter the cytosol. In the last decade, several reviews about RIPs were published setting the focus on the chemical and biological properties and activities, distribution in nature or possible use of the RIPs (e.g., [8,11,41,42,43,44]). There is one review that contains a table of all hitherto known RIPs [7]. During our investigations, we found that this table needs to be added with several more RIPs and RIP related proteins. Moreover, we found that some proteins were designated with different terms, e.g., nigrin b from Sambucus nigra or sieboldin-b from Sambucus sieboldiana were also designated as SNA-V or SSA-b-2, respectively. In addition, in some cases, the same term was used to designate different proteins, e.g., the term momordin II was used for a protein from Momordica balsamina as well as for a protein from Momordica charantia or the term MAP was used for a protein (MAP 30) from Momorica charantia and for a protein from Mirabilis jalapa (MAP = Mirabilis antiviral protein). These examples are intended to illustrate that there is still no unambiguous nomenclature for the RIPs. There are also ambiguities about the classification of some proteins, whether they are type 2 RIPs or just lectins, because no assay concerning the toxicity was performed or there was no information given about the structure: SGSL from Trichosanthes anguina, TCSL from Trichosanthes cucumerina, TKL-1 from Trichosanthes kirilowii, TDSL from Tichosanthes dioica, and BDA from Bryonia dioica. At least since the knowledge that RIPs and lectins evolved from common ancestral genes [29], it is very likely that there are a number of other RIPs not detected to date. This assumption is corroborated by the investigation of several Adenia species, in which some new lectins were found, some of which may be referred to as type 2 RIP [45]. Therefore, with this review we created a summary table (Table 1) with all known RIPs and those proteins, which probably can be classified as RIPs, and we listed all terms that were used for the designation of these proteins. Since there is a phylogenetic relationship between RIPs and lectins, as mentioned above, we also listed the lectins from those plants, which are members of families that are known to include plants that synthesize one or more RIPs. For this, we focused on RIPs from plants, whereas other RIPs from algae, bacteria, and fungi are not considered further.
Table 1

Summary table of ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) and RIP related proteins from plants.

FamilySpecies 1ProteinClassific.Mw 2IC50 3SourceReferences
AdoxaceaeSambucus ebulus L.Ebulitin αRIP 132 kDa10 ng/mLleaves[46]
Ebulitin βRIP 129 kDa10 ng/mLleaves[46]
Ebulitin γRIP 129 kDa10 ng/mLleaves[46]
Ebulin fRIP 256 kDa96 ng/mL; 0.3 nM (A) 5green fruits[29,47]
Ebulin lRIP 256 kDa8.5 ng/mL; 0.15 nM (A) 5leaves[29,48,49]
Ebulin r1RIP 256 kDa2.3 ng/mLrhizomes[49]
Ebulin r2RIP 256 kDa2.3 ng/mLrhizomes[49]
SEARIP 2135,630 Da1 nMbark[50]
SEAIIlectin33.5 kDa-rhizomes[49]
SELfdlectin68 kDa820 ng/mLgreen fruits[47]
SELldlectin67,906 Da-leaves[51,52]
SELlmlectin34,239 Da-young shoots[53]
Sambucus nigra L.α-NigritinRIP 129 kDa2.44–34 ng/mLleaves[54]
β-NigritinRIP 140 kDa2.44–34 ng/mLleaves[54]
γ-NigritinRIP 127.5 kDa2.44–34 ng/mLleaves[54]
Nigritin f1RIP 124,095 Da100 ng/mLgreen and mature fruits[55]
Nigritin f2RIP 123,565 Da100 ng/mLmature fruits[55]
basic Nigrin bRIP 263,469 Da18 pg/mL; 0.3 pM (A) 5bark[56]
Nigrin b = SNA-VRIP 2120 kDa261 pM; 0.03 nM (A) 5bark[29,57,58,59]
Nigrin f = SNA-VfRIP 2120 kDa1.9 ng/mL; 1.8 ng/mL; 0.03 nM (A) 5fruits[29,60,61,62]
Nigrin l1RIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4leaves[63]
Nigrin l2RIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4leaves[63]
Nigrin sRIP 257 kDa~1 µg/mLseeds[64]
SNA-IRIP 2240 kDa150 ng/mL; 600 pMbark[58,65,66,67,68]
SNA-I’RIP 2120 kDa150 ng/mLbark[67,69]
SNA-IfRIP 2240 kDan.a. 4fruits[69,70]
SNAflu-IRIP 2subunits of 30–33 kDan.a. 4inflorescen-ces[71,72]
AdoxaceaeSambucus nigra L.SNLRP1RIP 262 kDa0.5 µg/mL; 5.74 nM (A) 5bark[29,73,74]
SNLRP2RIP 260–62 kDan.a. 4bark[74]
SNA-ldlectinn.a. 4-leaves[63]
SNA-lmlectinn.a. 4-leaves[63]
SNA-IIlectin60 kDa-bark[58,68,75]
SNA-IIIlectin50 kDa-seeds[58,76]
SNA-IV = SNA-IVflectin60 kDa-fruits[58,62,77,78]
SNA-IVllectinn.a. 4-leaves[63]
SNApol-Ilectinsubunits of 26 kDa-pollen[71]
SNApol-IIlectinsubunits of 20 kDa-pollen[71]
TrSNA-Ilectin22 kDa-bark[70]
TrSNA-Iflectin22 kDa-fruits[70]
Sambucus racemosa L.basic racemosin bRIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4bark[72]
SRARIP 2120 kDan.a. 4bark[72,79]
SRLbm = SRAbmlectin30 kDa-bark[72,80]
Sambucus sieboldiana (Miq.) Blume ex Graebn.SSA = SSA-b-1RIP 2160 kDa985 ng/mL; 16.4 nM (A) 5bark[81,82,83]
Sieboldin-b = SSA-b-2RIP 259.4 kDa0.9 ng/mL; 0.015 nM (A) 5bark[29,83,84]
SSA-b-3lectin34,262 Da20–30 µg/mLbark[83]
SSA-b-4lectin32,333 Da20–30 µg/mLbark[83]
AizoaceaeMesembryanthe-mum crystallinum L.RIP1RIP 131.6 kDan.a. 4leaves[85]
AmaranthaceaeAmaranthus caudatus L.Amaranthin = ACAlectin63.5 kDa-seeds[86,87,88]
Amaranthus cruentus L.ACLlectin66 kDa-seeds[89]
Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. [Syn.: Amaranthus leucocarpus S. Watson]A. leucocarpus lectinlectin45 kDa-seeds[90]
Amaranthus mangostanus L.AmaramanginRIP 129 kDan.a. 4seeds[91]
Amaranthus tricolor L.AAP-27RIP 127 kDan.a. 4leaves[92]
AmaranthaceaeAmaranthus viridis L.AmaranthinRIP 130 kDa25 pMleaves[93,94]
Beta vulgaris L.Beetin-27 = BE27RIP 127,592 Da1.15 ng/mLleaves[95,96,97]
Beetin-29 = BE29RIP 129 kDan.a. 4leaves[95,96,97]
BetavulginRIP 130 kDan.a. 4seedlings[98]
Celosia argentea L. [Syn.: Celosia cristata L.]CCP-25RIP 125 kDan.a. 4leaves[99,100]
CCP-27RIP 127 kDa25 ng/mLleaves[99,100,101]
Chenopodium album L.CAP30RIP 130 kDa2.26 pMleaves[102,103]
Spinacia oleracea L.SoRIP1 = BP31RIP 131 kDan.a. 4cell cultures[104,105,106,107]
SoRIP2RIP 1 candidate36 kDan.a. 4cell cultures[106,107]
AraliaceaeAralia elata (Miq.) Seem.AralinRIP 262 kDan.a. 4shoots[108,109]
Panax ginseng C.A.MeyPanaxaginpeculiar RIP 1 candidate/RNase52 kDa0.28 nMroots[110]
Panax quinquefolius L.Quinqueginsinpeculiar RIP 1 candidate/RNase53 kDa0.26 nMroots[111]
AsparagaceaeAsparagus officinalis L.Asparin 1RIP 130.5 kDa0.27 nMseeds[112,113]
Asparin 2RIP 129.8 kDa0.15 nMseeds[112,113]
Drimia maritima (L.) Stearn [Syn.: Charybdis maritima (L.) Speta]CharybdinRIP 129 kDa27.2 nMbulbs[114]
Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex BakerMusarmin 1RIP 128,708 Da7 ng/mLbulbs[115]
Musarmin 2RIP 130,003 Da9.5 ng/mLbulbs[115]
Musarmin 3RIP 127,626 Da4 ng/mLbulbs[115]
Musarmin 4RIP 128 kDa1.4–8.2 ng/mL; 50–280 nMrecomb. 6[116]
Polygonatum multiflorum (L.) All.PMRIPmRIP 260 kDan.a. 4leaves[117]
PMRIPtRIP 2240 kDan.a. 4leaves[117]
Yucca gloriosa var. tristis Carrière [Syn.: Yucca recurvifolia Salisb.]Yucca leaf protein = YLPRIP 123 kDan.a. 4leaves[118,119]
BasellaceaeBasella rubra L.Basella RIP 2aRIP 130.6 kDa1.70 ng/mLseeds[120]
Basella RIP 2bRIP 131.2 kDa1.70 ng/mLseeds[120]
Basella RIP 3RIP 131.2 kDa1.66 ng/mLseeds[120]
CaryophyllaceaeAgrostemma githago L.Agrostin 2RIP 130.6 kDa0.6 nMseeds[121,122]
Agrostin 5RIP 129.5 kDa0.47 nMseeds[121,122]
Agrostin 6RIP 129.6 kDa0.57 nMseeds[121,122]
AgrostinRIP 127 kDan.a. 4seeds[123]
Dianthus barbatus L.Dianthin 29RIP 129 kDa1.5 nMleaves[124]
Dianthus caryophyllus L.Dianthin 30RIP 129.5 kDa9.15 ng/mL; 0.3 nMleaves[122,125,126]
Dianthin 32RIP 131.7 kDa3.6 ng/mL; 0.12 nMleaves[125,126]
Dianthus chinensis L. [Syn.: Dianthus sinensis Link]D. sinensis RIPRIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4recomb. 6[127]
Gypsophila elegans M.Bieb.GypsophilinRIP 128 kDan.a. 4leaves[128]
Silene chalcedonica (L.) E.H.L.Krause [Syn.: Lychnis chalcedonica L.]LychninRIP 126,131 Da0.17 nMseeds[113,129,130]
Silene glaucifolia Lag. [Syn.: Petrocoptis glaucifolia (Lag.) Boiss.]Petroglaucin 1RIP 126.7 kDa6 ng/mLwhole plants[131]
Petroglaucin 2RIP 127.5 kDa0.7 ng/mLwhole plants[132]
Silene laxipruinosa Mayol & Rosselló [Syn.: Petrocoptis grandiflora Rothm.]PetrograndinRIP 128.6 kDa6.6 ng/mLwhole plants[131]
Saponaria ocymoides L.OcymoidinRIP 130.2 kDa46 pM; 4.8 ng/mLseeds[133,134]
Saponaria officinalis L.Saporin-L1 = SO-L1RIP 131.6 kDa0.25 nMleaves[135,136,137,138]
Saporin-L2 = SO-L2RIP 131.6 kDa0.54 nMleaves[135]
Saporin-L3 = SO-L3RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4leaves[135]
Saporin-l = SO-l = SO-4RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4leaves[139]
Saporin-R1 = SO-R1RIP 130.2 kDa0.86 nMroots[135]
Saporin-R2 = SO-R2RIP 130.9 kDa0.47 nMroots[135]
CaryophyllaceaeSaponaria officinalis L.Saporin-R3 = SO-R3RIP 130.9 kDa0.48 nMroots[135]
SO3aRIP 122.5 kDan.a. 4seeds[140]
SO3bRIP 119.4 kDan.a. 4seeds[140]
Saporin-S5 = Saporin 5 = SO-S5RIP 130.5 kDa0.05 nM; 10.3 ng/mLseeds[112,135,141]
Saporin-S6 = Saporin 6 = SO-6 = SO-S6RIP 128,577 Da0.06 nM; 0.6 ng/mLseeds[112,135,139,141,142,143,144,145]
Saporin-S8 = SO-S8RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[135]
Saporin-S9 = Saporin 9 = SO-S9RIP 128,495 Da0.037 nMseeds[112,122,135,146]
SAP-CRIP 128.5 kDa125 pMrecomb. 6[147]
SAP-SRIP 128,560 Da12 pMseeds[147]
Myosoton aquaticum (L.) Moench [Syn.: Stellaria aquatica (L.) Scop.]StellarinRIP 125 kDa0.04 nMleaves[148]
Stellaria media (L.) Vill.RIP Q3RIP 128.2 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[149]
Vaccaria hispanica (Mill.) Rauschert [Syn.: Vaccaria pyramidata Medik.]PyramidatinRIP 128.0 kDa89 pM; 3.6 ng/mLseeds[133]
CucurbitaceaeBenincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn.HispinRIP 121 kDa165 pMseeds[150]
α-benincasinsRIP 112 kDa20 pM; 0.22 ng/mLseeds[151]
β-benincasinsRIP 112 kDa320 pM; 3.4 ng/mLseeds[151]
Bryonia cretica subsp. dioica (Jacq.) Tutin. [Syn.: Bryonia dioica L.]Bryodin 1 = BD1RIP 129 kDa0.12 nM; 3.6 ng/mL; 7 pMroots[152,153]
Bryodin 2RIP 127 kDa9 pMroots[153]
Bryodin-LRIP 128.8 kDa0.09 nMleaves[113]
Bryodin-RRIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[154,155]
BDAlectin/RIP 2 like61 kDa>1500 nmroots[73,156]
CucurbitaceaeCitrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad.Colocin 1RIP 126.3 kDa0.04 nMseeds[113]
Colocin 2RIP 126.3 kDa0.13 nMseeds[113]
Cucurbita foetidissima KunthFoetidissiminpeculiar RIP 263 kDa25.9 nMroots[157]
Foetidissimin IIRIP 261 kDa251.6 nMroots[158]
Cucumis ficifolius A.Rich. [Syn.: Cucumis figarei Delile ex Naudin]Cucumis figarei RIP = CF-RIPRIP 1 candidaten.a. 4n.a. 4recomb. 6[159]
Cucurbita maxima DuchesneCucurmoschinsRIP 1 candidate9 kDa1.2 µMseeds[160]
Cucurbita moschata Duchesne [Syn.: Cucurbita moschata (Duchesne ex Lam.) Duchesne ex Poir.]CucurmosinRIP 127–28 kDan.a. 4sarcocarp[161,162,163]
Cucurmosin 2RIP 127,183 Dan.a. 4sarcocarp[164,165]
C. moschata RIPRIP 130,665 Da0.035 nM; 1.08 ng/mLskinned fruit[155]
MoschatinRIP 129 kDa0.26 nMseeds[166]
PRIP 1RIP 131 kDa0.82 nMleaves[167]
PRIP 2RIP 130.5 kDa0.79 nMleaves[167]
α-moschinsRIP 1 candidate12 kDa17 µMseeds[168]
β-moschinsRIP 1 candidate12 kDa300 nMseeds[168]
Cucurbita pepo L.PepocinRIP 126 kDa15.4 pMsarcocarp[169]
Cucurbita pepo var. texana (Scheele) D.S.Decker [Syn.: Cucurbita texana (Scheele) A. Gray]TexaninRIP 129.7 kDan.a. 4fruits[158]
Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) MakinoGynostemminRIP 127 kDan.a. 4leaves and stems[170]
Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.LageninRIP 1 candidate20 kDa0.21 nMseeds[171]
Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb.Luffaculin-1RIP 128 kDa3.6 ng/mL; 124 pMseeds[172,173]
Luffaculin-2RIP 128 kDan.a. 4seeds[173]
LuffangulinsRIP 15.6 kDa3.5 nMseeds[174]
Luffa acutangula fruit lectinlectin48 kDa-fruits[175]
CucurbitaceaeLuffa cylindrica (L.) M.Roem [Syn.: Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.]LuffinRIP 126 kDa0.42 ng/mLseeds[176]
Luffin-aRIP 127,021 Da1.64 ng/mLseeds[177,178]
Luffin-bRIP 127,275 Da0.84 ng/mLseeds[177,178]
α-luffinRIP 128 kDa10 ng/mL; 34.1 pM (recomb. 6)seeds[179,180,181]
β-luffinRIP 129 kDa50 ng/mLseeds[180,182]
LRIPRIP 130 kDa8 pMseeds[183]
LuffacylinsRIP 17.8 kDa0.14 nMseeds[184]
Luffin P1sRIP 15226.1 Da0.88 nMseeds[185]
Luffin-SsRIP 1 candidate10 kDa0.34 nMseeds[186]
LuffinS(1)sRIP 1 candidate8 kDa130 nMseeds[187]
LuffinS(2) = luffin S2sRIP 1 candidate7.8 kDa10 nMseeds[187,188]
LuffinS(3)sRIP 1 candidate8 kDa630 nMseeds[187]
Marah oreganus (Torr. & A. Gray) HowellMOR-IRIP 127,989 Da0.063 nMseeds[189]
MOR-IIRIP 127,632 Da0.071 nMseeds[189]
Momordica balsamina L.BalsaminRIP 128.6 kDa90.6 ng/mLseeds[190]
MbRIP-1RIP 130 kDan.a. 4seeds[191,192]
Momordin IIRIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4recomb. 6[193]
Momordica charantia L.MAP 30RIP 130 kDa3.3 nMseeds and fruits[194,195]
α-momorcharin = α-MC = α-MMCRIP 128,625–28,795 Da0.23 nMseeds[196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204]
β-momorcharin = β-MC = β-MMCRIP 129,074–29,076 Da0.19 nMseeds[196,197,198,200,201,202,203]
γ-momorcharin = γ-MMCsRIP 111.5 kDa55 nMseeds[205]
δ-momorcharin = δ-MMCRIP 130 kDa0.15 nMseeds[203]
ε-momorcharinRIP 1 candidate24 kDa170 nMfruits[203]
MomordinRIP 131 kDan.a. 4seeds[206]
Momordin = Momordica charantia inhibitorRIP 123–24 kDa1.8 ng/mLseeds[207,208,209,210,211,212]
Momordin IIRIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[213]
CucurbitaceaeMomordica charantia L.Momordin-aRIP 129.4 kDan.a. 4seeds[214,215]
Momordin-bRIP 129.4 kDan.a. 4seeds[214]
CharantinsRIP 19.7 kDa400 nMseeds[216]
MCL = M. charantia lectinlectin12.4 kDa-seeds[217]
MCL = Momordica charantia seed lectin = Momordica charantia lectinRIP 2115–124 kDa1.74 µg/mL; 5 µg/mLseeds[207,218,219,220]
MCL1RIP 260,993 Da1.9 nMseeds[221]
anti-H Lectinlectin150 kDa-seeds[222]
Momordica agglutininlectin30 kDa-seeds[223]
Momordinlectin22–23 kDa-seeds[223]
protein fraction 1lectin49 kDa-seeds[224]
protein fraction 2lectin49 kDa-seeds[224]
Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng.Cochinin BRIP 128 kDa0.36 nMseeds[225]
MomorcochinRIP 132 kDan.a. 4tubers[200,226]
Momorcochin-SRIP 130 kDa0.12 nMseeds[225,227]
Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle) C.Jeffrey ex A.M.Lu & Zhi Y.Zhang [Syn.: Momordica grosvenorii Swingle]MomorgrosvinRIP 127.7 kDa0.3 nMseeds[228]
Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.SechiuminRIP 127 kDa0.7 nMseeds[229]
Sechium edule fruit lectinlectin44 kDa-fruits[230]
Trichosanthes anguina L.TrichoanguinRIP 135 kDa0.08 nMseeds[231]
SGSLlectin/RIP 2 like62 kDan.a. 4seeds[232,233,234]
Trichosanthes cordata Roxb.TCA-Ilectin59 kDan.a. 4seeds[235]
TCA-IIlectin52 kDan.a. 4seeds[235]
CucurbitaceaeTrichosanthes cucumerina L.TCSLlectin/RIP 2 candidate69 kDan.a. 4seeds[236]
Trichosanthes cucumeroides (Ser.) Maxim.β-trichosanthin = β-TCSRIP 128 kDa2.8 ng/mL; 0.1 nMroot tubers[200,237,238]
Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim.α-kirilowinRIP 128.8 kDa1.2-1.8 ng/mL; 0.044–0.066 mMseeds[239]
β-kirilowinRIP 127.5 kDa1.8 ng/mLseeds[240]
TAP 29RIP 129 kDa3.7 nMroot tubers[241,242]
TK-35RIP 135,117 Da2.45 nMcell cultures[243]
TrichobitacinRIP 127,228 Dan.a. 4root tubers[244,245,246]
TrichokirinRIP 127 kDa0.06–0.13 nMseeds[247]
Trichomislin = TCMRIP 127,211 Da2.26 nMrecomb. 6[248]
Trichosanthin = Trichosanthes antiviral protein = TAP = TCS = α-trichosanthin = α-TCS = GLQ223RIP 126–28 kDa6.1 ng/mL; 0.23 nM; 0.36 ng/mL; 1.31 nMroot tubers[198,200,238,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256]
TrichosanthinRIP 125 kDan.a. 4root tubers[257]
β-trichosanthin = β-TCSRIP 126 kDa7 ng/mLroot tubers[255]
γ-trichosanthin = γ-TCSRIP 126 kDa12 ng/mLroot tubers[255]
Trichokirin S1sRIP 111,426 Da0.7 nMseeds[258]
S-TrichokirinsRIP 18 kDa115 pMseeds[259]
TrichosanthripsRIP 110,964 Da1.6 ng/mLseeds[256]
TKL-1 = Trichosanthes kirilowii lectin-1lectin/RIP 2 candidate60 kDan.a. 4root tubers[260,261]
TK-Ilectinn.a. 4-root tubers[262,263]
TK-IIlectinn.a. 4-root tubers[262,263]
TK-IIIlectinn.a. 4-root tubers[262,263]
Trichosanthes kirilowii lectinlectin57 kDa-seeds[264]
CucurbitaceaeTrichosanthes kirilowii Maximoviczvar. japonica (Miquel) KitamuraKarasurin-ARIP 127,215 Da0.1–0.3 ng/mLroot tubers[265,266,267,268]
Karasurin-BRIP 127,214 Da0.1–0.3 ng/mLroot tubers[267]
Karasurin-CRIP 127,401 Da0.1–0.3 ng/mLroot tubers[267]
Trichosanthes lepiniateTrichomaglinRIP 124,673 Da10.1 nMroot tuber[269]
Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.TDSLlectin/RIP 2 candidate55 kDan.a. 4seeds[270]
Trichosanthes sp. Bac Kan 8-98TrichobakinRIP 127 kDa3.5 pMleaves[271]
CupressaceaeThuja occidentalis L.Arborvitae RIPRIP candidaten.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[272]
EuphorbiaceaeCroton tiglium L.Crotin IRIP 1 candidate40 kDan.a. 4seeds[273,274,275]
Crotin 2RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[276,277,278]
Euphorbia characias L.E. characias lectinlectin80 kDa-latex[279]
Suregada multiflora (A.Juss.) Baill. [Syn.: Gelonium multiflorum A.Juss.]Gelonin = GAP 31RIP 130–31 kDa0.406 ng/mL; 0.32 nMseeds[126,280,281,282,283]
Hura Crepitans L.Hura crepitans RIPRIP 128 kDan.a. 4latex, leaves[27,112]
Hura crepitans RIP-5RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4latex[284]
Hura crepitans latex lectinRIP 2112 kDa-latex[279]
Crepitinlectinn.a. 4n.a. 4latex[285,286]
Hurinlectin70 kDa-seeds[287,288]
Hura crepitans seed lectinlectin120 kDa-seeds[286]
Jatropha curcas L.CurcinRIP 128.2 kDa0.42 nMseeds[273,289]
Curcin 2RIP 130.1 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[290,291]
Curcin-LRIP 132 kDa4 µg/mLleaves[292,293]
Jc-SCRIPRIP 138,938 Dan.a. 4seed coat[294]
Manihot palmata Müll. Arg.MapalminRIP 132.3 kDa0.05 nMseeds[113]
EuphorbiaceaeManihot esculenta Crantz. [Syn.: Manihot utilissima Pohl]Manutin 1RIP 1n.a. 40.05 nMseeds[284,295]
Manutin 2RIP 1n.a. 40.12 nMseeds[295]
Ricinus communis L.Ricin = crystalline Ricin = Ricin DRIP 262.8 kDa0.14 nM (A) 5; 814 pM; 5.5 ng/mLseeds[59,281,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309]
Ricin ERIP 264 kDan.a. 4seeds[310,311,312]
RCA = Ricinus communis agglutinin = RCAI = RCA120 = R. communis hemagglutinin = RCB-PHA IRIP 2118–130 kDan.a. 4seeds[303,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321]
RCAII = RCA60 = RCB-PHA IIRIP 260 kDan.a. 4seeds[313,314,316,317]
Ricinus communis, USARicin 1RIP 266 kDan.a. 4seeds[303,322]
Ricin 2RIP 266 kDan.a. 4seeds[303,322]
Ricin 3RIP 266 kDan.a. 4seeds[303,322]
Ricinus communis, IndiaRicin IRIP 264 kDan.a. 4seeds[322,323]
Ricin IIRIP 264 kDan.a. 4seeds[322,323]
Ricin IIIRIP 264 kDan.a. 4seeds[322,323]
Ricinus sanguienus, FranceRicin11RIP 257,805 Dan.a. 4seeds[322,324]
Ricin12RIP 262,163 Dan.a. 4seeds[322,324]
Ricin2RIP 263,116 Dan.a. 4seeds[322,324]
FabaceaeAbrus precatorius L.AbrinRIP 2260 kDa0.5 nM (A) 5seeds[29,307,315,323,325,326,327,328,329,330]
Abrin-a = Abrin C = Abrin-IIIRIP 263–65.5 kDa60 pM (A) 5seeds[331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340]
Abrin-bRIP 267 kDan.a. 4seeds[333,334,335,338]
Abrin-c = Abrin A = Abrin-IRIP 260.1–62.5 kDan.a. 4seeds[331,332,334,335,336,337]
Abrin-dRIP 267 kDan.a. 4seeds[334,335,338]
Abrin-IIRIP 263 kDan.a. 4seeds[337]
FabaceaeAbrus precatorius L.APA = Abrus precatorius agglutinin = Abrus lectin = AAGRIP 2126–134 kDa3.5 nMseeds[315,334,341,342,343,344,345]
APA-IRIP 2130 kDan.a. 4seeds[337,346]
APA-IIRIP 2128 kDan.a. 4seeds[337]
Abrus pulchellus ThwaitesPulchellinRIP 262 kDan.a. 4seeds[347,348,349]
Pulchellin PIRIP 261.5–63 kDan.a. 4seeds[350]
Pulchellin PIIRIP 261.5–63 kDan.a. 4seeds[350]
Pulchellin PIIIRIP 261.5–63 kDan.a. 4seeds[350]
Pisum sativum subsp. sativum L. [Syn.: Pisum sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir.]α-pisavinRIP 120.5 kDa0.5 nMseeds[351]
β-pisavinRIP 118.7 kDa0.5 nMseeds[351]
Pisum sativum var. macrocarponSativinRIP 1 candidate38 kDa14 µMlegumes[352]
IridaceaeIris hollandica var. Professor BlaauwIrisRIP = IRIPRIP 128 kDa0.1–0.16 nMbulbs[353,354]
IrisRIP.A1RIP 129 kDa0.16 nMbulbs[353]
IrisRIP.A2RIP 129 kDa0.12 nMbulbs[353]
IrisRIP.A3RIP 129 kDa0.10 nMbulbs[353]
IRARIP 260.4 kDan.a. 4bulbs[355]
IRAbRIP 265 kDan.a. 4bulbs[356,357]
IRArRIP 265 kDan.a. 4bulbs[356]
LamiaceaeClerodendrum aculeatum (L.) Schltdl.CA-SRIRIP 1 candidate34 kDa<0.01 nMleaves[358,359]
Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn.CIP-29RIP 129 kDa0.548 nM; 16 ng/mLleaves[360,361]
CIP-34RIP 1 candidate34 kDa87.4 nM; 3 µg/mLleaves[360,361]
Leonurus japonicus Houtt.LeonurinRIP candidaten.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[362]
LauraceaeCinnamomum bodinieri H. Lév.BodinierinRIP 265 kDa1.2 nM (A) 5kernel[363]
LauraceaeCinnamomum camphora (L.) J.PreslCamphorinRIP 123 kDa0.098 nMseeds[364,365]
CinnamominRIP 261 kDa9.7 nM (A) 5seeds[364,365,366,367]
Cinnamomin 1RIP 261 kDan.a. 4seeds[364]
Cinnamomin 2RIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[364]
Cinnamomin 3RIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[364]
CinphorinsRIP 246 kDa1.2 nMseeds[367,368]
Cinnamomum parthenoxylon (Jack) Meisn. [Syn.: Cinnamomum porrectum (Roxb.) Kosterm.]PorrectinRIP 264.5 kDa0.11 µMseeds[369]
MalvaceaeAbelmoschus esculentus (L.) MoenchAbelesculinRIP 130 kDan.a. 4seeds[370]
NyctaginaceaeBoerhaavia diffusa L.Boerhaavia inhibitorRIP 1 candidate16–20 kDan.a. 4roots[371,372,373]
Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd.BAP IRIP 128 kDan.a. 4roots[374]
Bouganin = Bougainvillea RIP IRIP 126.2 kDa10.5 ng/mLleaves[120,375]
Bougainvillea × buttiana cv. Enid LancesterBBP-24RIP 124 kDan.a. 4leaves[376,377]
BBP-28RIP 128 kDan.a. 4leaves[376,377]
Bougainvillea × buttiana cv. MaharaBBAP1RIP 135.49 kDan.a. 4leaves[378,379]
Mirabilis expansa (Ruiz & Pav.) Standl.ME1RIP 129,208 Dan.a. 4roots[380,381]
ME2RIP 127 kDan.a. 4roots[380]
Mirabilis jalapa L.MAPRIP 127,788 Da5.4 ng/mLroots/seeds[373,382,383]
MAP-2RIP 130,412 Da41.4 ng/mLseeds[383]
MAP-3RIP 129,771 Da13.3 ng/mLseeds[383]
MAP-4RIP 129,339 Da15.3 ng/mLseeds and leaves[383]
MAP-SRIP 127,789 Dan.a. 4seeds[146]
OlacaceaeMalania oleifera Chun & S. K. LeeMalaninlectin/RIP 2 candidate61875 Dan.a. 4seeds[384]
OlacaceaeXimenia americana L.Riproximin = RpxRIP 256 kDan.a. 4fruit kernels[385,386]
Rpx-IRIP 250 kDan.a. 4fruit kernels[386]
Rpx-IIRIP 253 kDan.a. 4fruit kernels[386]
PassifloraceaeAdenia digitata (Harv.) Engl.Modeccin = Modeccin 4BRIP 257–63 kDa4 µg/mL; 2.52 µg/mL; 66 ng/mL (A) 5roots[387,388,389,390]
Modeccin 6BRIP 257 kDa0.31 µg/mLroots[390]
Adenia ellenbeckii HarmsA. ellenbeckii lectinRIP 2 candidate60 kDa10.1 µg/mL; 1.2 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia fruticosa Burtt DavyA. fruticosa lectinlectin30 kDa>100 µg/mLcaudex[45]
Adenia glauca SchinzA. glauca lectinRIP 2 candidaten.a. 4>10 µg/mL; >5 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia goetzei Harms (unresolved name)A. goetzei lectinRIP 260 kDa55.1 µg/mL; 0.7 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia keramanthus HarmsA. keramanthus lectinRIP 2 candidate60–65 kDa10.0 µg/mL; 1.1 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia lanceolata Engl.LanceolinRIP 260 kDa5.2 µg/mL; 1.1 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45,391,392]
Adenia racemosa W. J. de WildeA. racemosa lectinlectin30 kDa>400 µg/mLcaudex[45]
Adenia spinosa Burtt DavyA. spinosa lectinRIP 2 candidaten.a. 44.7 µg/mL; 0.8 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia stenodactyla HarmsStenodactylinRIP 260 kDa5.6 µg/mL; 0.5 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45,391,392]
Adenia venenata Forssk.A. venenata lectinRIP 2 candidate60 kDa2.4 µg/mL; 0.4 µg/mL (A) 5caudex[45]
Adenia volkensii HarmsVolkensinRIP 262 kDa5 µg/mL; 84 nM; 0.37 nM (A) 5 22 ng/mL (A) 5; 7.5 µg/mL; 0.66 µg/mL (A) 5roots[45,393,394,395]
PhytolaccaceaePhytolacca americana L.α-PAPRIP 133,068 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[396,397]
PAP = Phytolacca americana protein = pokeweed antiviral proteinRIP 129–30 kDa0.29 nMleaves[29,398,399,400,401,402,403]
PAP-IRIP 130 kDa2 pMspring leaves[404]
PAP-IIRIP 130–31 kDa4 pMearly summer leaves[399,400,404,405]
PAP-IIIRIP 130 kDa3 pMlate summer leaves[404]
PAP-CRIP 129 kDa0.062 nM; 2 ng/mLcell cultures[406]
PAP-HRIP 129.5 kDan.a. 4hairy roots[407]
PAP-RRIP 129.8 kDa0.05 nMroots[113]
PAP-SRIP 130 kDa36-83 nM; 1.09–2.5 ng/mLseeds[399,408]
PAP-S1RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4recomb. 6[397]
PAP-S2RIP 1n.a. 4n.a. 4recomb. 6[397]
Phytolacca dioica L.Diocin 1RIP 130,047 Da19.74 ng/mL; 0.658 nMleaves of young plants[409]
Diocin 2RIP 129,910 Da6.85 ng/mL; 0.229 nMleaves of young plants[409]
PD-L1RIP 132,715 Da102 pM; 3.32 ng/mL; 8.5 pMleaves[410,411]
PD-L2RIP 131,542 Da110 pM; 3.46 ng/mLleaves[410,412]
PD-L3RIP 130,356 Da228 pM; 6.93 ng/mLleaves[410,412]
PD-L4RIP 129185 Da134 pM; 3.92 ng/mLleaves[410,413]
PD-S1RIP 130.9 kDa0.12 nMseeds[414]
PD-S2RIP 129,586 Da0.06 nMseeds[414,415]
PD-S3RIP 132 kDa0.08 nMseeds[414]
PhytolaccaceaePhytolacca dodecandra L’Hér.DodecandrinRIP 129 kDan.a. 4leaves[416,417]
Dodecandrin CRIP 131–32 kDan.a. 4cell cultures[417]
Phytolacca heterotepala H. WalterHeterotepalin 4RIP 129,326 Da82 pMleaves[418]
Heterotepalin 5bRIP 130,477 Da52 pMleaves[418]
Phytolacca insularis NakaiInsularin = PIP = Phytolacca insularis antiviral proteinRIP 131 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[7,419]
PIP2 = P. insularis antiviral protein 2RIP 129.6 kDa0.04 nMrecomb. 6[420]
PoaceaeHordeum vulgare L.Barley toxin = Barley translation inhibitor = Barley Protein Synthesis Inhibitor = BPSI = RIP 30RIP 130 kDa0.47 nMseeds[281,421,422,423,424]
Barley toxin I = Barley translation inhibitor IRIP 130 kDa25 ng/mLseeds[422]
Barley toxin II = Barley translation inhibitor II = Barley Protein Synthesis Inhibitor II = BPSI IIRIP 129,836 Da25 ng/mLseeds[281,421,422,425]
Barley toxin III = Barley translation inhibitor IIIRIP 130 kDa15 ng/mLseeds[281,422]
JIP60RIP 3/peculiar RIP 160 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[5,426]
PoaceaeOryza sativa L.Oryza sativa RIPRIP 127 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[427]
Secale cereale L.RPSIRIP 130,171 Da0.42 µg/mLseeds[421,428]
Triticum aestivum L.TritinRIP 130 kDan.a. 4germ[421,429,430,431]
Tritin 1RIP 130 kDa250 ng/mLwhole wheat[432]
Tritin 2RIP 130 kDa250 ng/mLwhole wheat[432]
Tritin 3RIP 130 kDa250 ng/mLwhole wheat[432]
Tritin-SRIP 132.1–32.8 kDan.a. 4seeds[433]
Tritin-LRIP 137.0–37.9 kDan.a. 4leaves[433]
Zea mays L.b-32 = maize RIP = maize proRIP1RIP 3/peculiar RIP 134 kDa28–60 pM; 0.7–1.5 ng/mL; 0.065 nMseeds[4,434,435,436,437,438]
Maize proRIP2RIP 3/peculiar RIP 131.1 kDan.a. 4recomb. 6[436,437]
RanunculaceaeEranthis hyemalis (L.) Salisb.EHLRIP 262 kDan.a. 4root tubers[439,440]
SantalaceaePhoradendron californicum Nutt.PCLRIP 269 kDan.a. 4n.n[441]
Viscum album L. (Himalayan mistletoe)HmRipRIP 265 kDan.a. 4leaves[442,443,444]
HmRip 1RIP 265 kDan.a. 4leaves[442,443,444]
HmRip 2RIP 265 kDan.a. 4leaves[442,443,444]
HmRip 3RIP 265 kDan.a. 4leaves[442,443,444]
HmRip 4RIP 265 kDan.a. 4leaves[442,443,444]
Viscum album L. (European mistletoe)ML-I = Mistletoe lectin I = Viscumin = Eu-ML = EML-1 = VAA-IRIP 2115–125 kDa2.6 µg/mL; 0.21 µg/mL (A) 5; 3.7 pM (A) 5leaves[234,445,446,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454]
ML-II = Mistletoe lectin II = VAA-IIRIP 260–64 kDan.a. 4leaves[448,450,451,452]
ML-III = Mistletoe lectin III = VAA-IIIRIP 250–61 kDan.a. 4leaves[448,450,451,452]
SantalaceaeViscum articulatum Burm. f.Articulatin-DRIP 266 kDan.a. 4whole plant[455]
Viscum coloratum (Kom.) Nakai [Syn.: Viscum album subsp. coloratum Kom.]KMLRIP 2n.a. 4n.a. 4leaves[456]
KML-CRIP 259.5 kDan.a. 4leaves[454,457]
KML-IILRIP 260 kDan.a. 4leaves[457]
KML-IIURIP 264 kDan.a. 4leaves[457]
VCARIP 260 kDan.a. 4leaves[458,459]
SolanaceaeNicotiana tabacum L.CIP31RIP-like protein31 kDan.a. 4leaves[460]
TRIPRIP 1 candidate26 kDa100 ng/mLleaves[461]
ThymelaeaceaePhaleria macrocarpa (Scheff.) Boerl.P. macrocarpa RIPRIP candidaten.a. 4n.a. 4seeds[462]

1 For the botanical name of the plant species we chose the current accepted name from www.theplantlist.org. In some cases, there is also given a synonym, because the protein/RIP is derived from that synonym that is given in the corresponding reference; 2 For the values of molecular weight (Mw) we listed the latest values from the native unreduced proteins obtained from gel filtration or from SDS-PAGE. If there were too many different values from different authors, we listed a range. We listed the exact value obtained from MALDI-TOF, ESI-TOF or Q-TOF, if this was available; 3 IC50 is the half minimal inhibitory concentration (50%) of the protein, which inhibits translation from a cell free system using rabbit reticulocyte lysate. For the IC50 values, we listed the values of the molar mass or concentration in mg/mL. In some cases, there were many different values from different laboratories that led us to list a range; 4 n.a. = not available; in the case of IC50 values there are several reasons for n.a.: 1. The translation-inhibitory assay was not performed; 2. The translation-inhibitory assay was performed by using another system than the cell free system with rabbit reticulocyte lysate, e.g., cancer cells; 3. The IC50 values were specified with another unit, e.g., mg/kg; 5 (A) = A-chain; the IC50 value followed by (A) is for the reduced type 2 RIP; 6 recomb. = recombinant; Proteins obtained through biotechnological procedures.

Summary table of ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) and RIP related proteins from plants. 1 For the botanical name of the plant species we chose the current accepted name from www.theplantlist.org. In some cases, there is also given a synonym, because the protein/RIP is derived from that synonym that is given in the corresponding reference; 2 For the values of molecular weight (Mw) we listed the latest values from the native unreduced proteins obtained from gel filtration or from SDS-PAGE. If there were too many different values from different authors, we listed a range. We listed the exact value obtained from MALDI-TOF, ESI-TOF or Q-TOF, if this was available; 3 IC50 is the half minimal inhibitory concentration (50%) of the protein, which inhibits translation from a cell free system using rabbit reticulocyte lysate. For the IC50 values, we listed the values of the molar mass or concentration in mg/mL. In some cases, there were many different values from different laboratories that led us to list a range; 4 n.a. = not available; in the case of IC50 values there are several reasons for n.a.: 1. The translation-inhibitory assay was not performed; 2. The translation-inhibitory assay was performed by using another system than the cell free system with rabbit reticulocyte lysate, e.g., cancer cells; 3. The IC50 values were specified with another unit, e.g., mg/kg; 5 (A) = A-chain; the IC50 value followed by (A) is for the reduced type 2 RIP; 6 recomb. = recombinant; Proteins obtained through biotechnological procedures.

3. Exceptions Prove the Rule

To be classified as “classical” type 1 or type 2 RIP, a protein needs both the structure and the N-glycosidase activity including the conserved amino acid residues, which are believed to be present in all RIPs, of the putative active site region [94,101,463]. This active site region is also known as shiga/ricin toxic domain [106]. Beside the peculiar type 1 RIPs, b-32 and JIP60, there is a certain amount of other proteins that cannot be grouped into the classical type 1 or type 2 RIPs, because of structural and functional differences.

3.1. Small RIPs

First of all, there are “small type 1 RIPs” (sRIP 1; Table 2), which are single chain proteins exhibiting N-glycosidase activity with a smaller molecular weight than the classical type 1 RIPs. Interestingly, all known small type 1 RIPs are synthesized by plants belonging to the family Cucurbitaceae. α-luffin and β-luffin from Luffa cylindrica indeed have the same size as the other small type 1 RIPs, but because of their lower toxicity of 17 µM and 300 nM, respectively, and due to the unknown mechanism of action, they are classified as “small type 1 RIP candidates” (Table 3). Also luffin-S, luffinS(1), luffinS(2), and luffinS(3) have similar sizes as the other small type 1 RIPs and all of them inhibit protein synthesis in a cell-free system, but it was not analyzed, whether the translation-inhibitory is due to the N-glycosidase activity or not. In addition, a different mechanism of action was found for luffin-S [186]. For this reason, the luffinSs are considered as small type 1 RIP candidates (Table 3). Another small type 1 RIP candidate is cucurmoschin that was designated as an antifungal protein by the authors [160]. Cucurmoschin indeed inhibits protein synthesis in a cell-free system, but there was no homology with other type 1 RIPs or small type 1 RIPs concerning the amino acid sequence specified, but the fact that the N-glycosidase activity was neither verified nor excluded led us to the decision to classify cucurmoschin as a small type 1 RIP candidate. Lagenin, α-pisavin and β-pisavin have molecular weights of 20 kDa, 20.5 kDa and 18.7 kDa, respectively; thus, they differ from the classical type 1 RIPs as well as from the small type 1 RIPs. Lagenin inhibits cell-free translation in a rabbit reticulocyte system, but it was not clarified whether this is due to the N-glycosidase activity [171]. Because the size of lagenin is closer to the classical type 1 RIPs than to the biggest known small type 1 RIPs (α-benincasin and β-benincasin, both of them 12 kDa), lagenin should be classified as a type 1 RIP candidate. α-pisavin and β-pisavin have molecular weights that are also closer to the classical type 1 RIPs than to the small type 1 RIPs, but compared with lagenin, they both have the N-glycosidase activity and, in addition, show amino acid similarity with other type 1 RIPs. For that reason, α-pisavin and β-pisavin are considered type 1 RIPs.
Table 2

Small RIPs.

ProteinSourceMwClassificationReferences
α-benincasinBenincasa hispida (Cucurbitaceae)12 kDasRIP 1[151]
β-benincasinBenincasa hispida (Cucurbitaceae)12 kDasRIP 1[151]
CharantinMomordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)9.7 kDasRIP 1[216]
CinphorinCinnamomum camphora (Lauraceae)46 kDasRIP 2[367,368]
LuffacylinLuffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)7.8 kDasRIP 1[184]
LuffangulinLuffa acutangula (Cucurbitaceae)5.6 kDasRIP 1[174]
Luffin P1Luffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)5226.1 DasRIP 1[185]
γ-momorcharinMomordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)11.5 kDasRIP 1[205]
S-trichokirinTrichosanthes kirilowii (Cucurbitaceae)8 kDasRIP 1[259]
Trichokirin S1Trichosanthes kirilowii (Cucurbitaceae)11426 DasRIP 1[258]
TrichosanthripTrichosanthes kirilowii (Cucurbitaceae)10964 DasRIP 1[256]
Table 3

RIP candidates and RIP-like proteins.

ProteinSourceMwIC50ClassificationReferences
A. ellenbeckii lectinAdenia ellenbeckii (Passifloraceae)60 kDa10.1 µg/mL; 1.2 µg/mLRIP 2 candidate[45]
A. glauca lectinAdenia glauca (Passifloraceae)n.a.>10 µg/mL; >5 µg/mLRIP 2 candidate[45]
A. keramanthus lectinAdenia keramanthus (Passifloraceae)60–65 kDa10.0 µg/mL; 1.1 µg/mLRIP 2 candidate[45]
A. spinosa lectinAdenia spinosa (Passifloraceae)n.a.4.7 µg/mL; 0.8 µg/mLRIP 2 candidate[45]
A. venenata lectinAdenia venenata (Passifloraceae)60 kDa2.4 µg/mL; 0.4 µg/mLRIP 2 candidate[45]
Arborvitae RIPThuja occidentalis (Cupressaceae)n.a.n.a.RIP candidate[272]
BDABryonia cretica subsp. dioica (Cucurbitaceae)61 kDa>1500 nmRIP 2-like lectin[73,156]
Boerhaavia inhibitorBoerhaavia diffusa (Nyctaginaceae)16–20 kDan.a.RIP 1 candidate[371,372,373]
CA-SRIClerodendrum aculeatum (Lamiaceae)34 kDa<0.01 nMRIP 1 candidate[358,359]
CF-RIPCucumis ficifolius (Cucurbitaceae)n.a.n.a.RIP 1 candidate[159]
CIP-34Clerodendrum inerme (Lamiaceae)34 kDa87.4 nM; 3 µg/mLRIP 1 candidate[360,361]
CIP31Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae)31 kDan.a.RIP 1-like protein[460]
Crotin ICroton tiglium (Euphorbiaceae)40 kDan.a.RIP 1 candidate[273,275]
CucurmoschinCucurbita maxima (Cucurbitaceae)9 kDa1.2 µMsmall RIP 1 candidate[160]
FoetidissiminCucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae)63 kDa25.9 nMpeculiar RIP 2[157]
LageninLagenaria siceraria (Cucurbitaceae)20 kDa0.21 nMRIP 1 candidate[171]
LeonurinLeonurus japonicus (Laminariaceae)n.a.n.a.RIP candidate[362]
Luffin-SLuffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)10 kDa0.34 nMsmall RIP 1 candidate[186]
LuffinS(1)Luffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)8 kDa130 nMsmall RIP 1 candidate[187]
LuffinS(2) = luffin S2Luffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)7.8 kDa10 nMsmall RIP 1 candidate[187,188]
LuffinS(3)Luffa cylindrica (Cucurbitaceae)8 kDa630 nMsmall RIP 1 candidate[187]
MalaninMalania oleifera (Olacaceae)61,875 Dan.a.lectin/RIP 2 candidate[384]
ε-momorcharinMomordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)24 kDa170 nMRIP 1 candidate[203]
α-moschinCucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae)12 kDa17 µMsmall RIP 1 candidate[168]
β-moschinCucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae)12 kDa300 nMsmall RIP 1 candidate[168]
PanaxaginPanax ginseng (Araliaceae)52 kDa0.28 nMpeculiar RIP 1 candidate/RNase[110]
P. macrocarpa RIPPhaleria macrocarpa (Thymelaceae)n.a.n.a.RIP candidate[462]
QuinqueginsinPanax quinquefolius (Araliaceae)53 kDa0.26 nMpeculiar RIP 1 candidate/RNase[111]
SativinPisum sativum var. macrocarpon (Fabaceae)38 kDa14 µMRIP 1 candidate[352]
SGSLTrichosanthes anguina (Cucurbitaceae)62 kDan.a.RIP 2-like lectin[234]
SoRIP2Spinacia oleraceae (Amaranthaceae)36 kDan.a.RIP 1 candidate[106,107]
TCSLTrichosanthes cucumerina (Cucurbitaceae)69 kDan.a.lectin/RIP 2 candidate[236]
TDSLTrichosanthes dioica (Cucurbitaceae)55 kDan.a.lectin/RIP 2 candidate[270]
TKL-1Trichosanthes kirilowii (Cucurbitaceae)60 kDan.a.lectin/RIP 2 candidate[260]
TRIPNicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae)26 kDa100 ng/mLRIP 1 candidate[461]
Cinphorin is a type 2 RIP from the seeds of Cinnamomum camphora with a molecular weight of 46 kDa, which is due to the smaller A-chain than the other classical type 2 RIPs [368]. It is proposed that cinphorin is a cleaving product of cinnamomin, another type 2 RIP from Cinnamomum camphora, or its mRNA [367]. Cleaving processes during the evolution of RIPs are not unusual [29], but cinphorin is the only type 2 RIP with a smaller A-chain known to date, and, therefore, it is questionable whether it is necessary to denominate an extra classification for cinphorin. Considering that there might be more RIPs that are not detected to date, of which one could be another type 2 RIP with a smaller A-chain, however, we propose to classify cinphorin as a “small type 2 RIP” (sRIP 2). Small RIPs. RIP candidates and RIP-like proteins.

3.2. RIP Candidates and RIP-Like Proteins

There are four single chain proteins with a bigger molecular weight than the other type 1 RIPs: Jc-SCRIP from Jatropha curcas (38 kDa), β-nigritin from Sambucus nigra (40 kDa), sativin from Pisum sativum (38 kDa), and CIP-34 from Clerodendrum inerme (34 kDa). β-nigritin exhibits N-glycosidase activity and, therefore, it is classified as a classic type 1 RIP, because there are no further structural peculiarities [54]. Jc-SCRIP differs not only on the basis of the molecular weight from the other type 1 RIPs, but also with regard to its N-terminal amino acid sequence, acidic isoelectric point, high temperature stability, and high sugar content giving this protein additional lectin properties [294]. Because of those unique molecular characteristics, it might be classified as peculiar type 1 RIP as well as b-32 and JIP60. But that would make this issue unnecessarily complicated, because Jc-SCRIP does not have such structural differences compared to other type 1 RIPs like as b-32 and JIP60. Therefore, and because of its N-glycosidase activity, Jc-SCRIP is classified as a classical type 1 RIP. Compared with that, sativin and CIP-34 cannot be classified as classical type 1 RIPs, because, among other things, the N-glycosidase activity was not found, and, therefore, together with other proteins, they are referred to as “RIP candidates” or “RIP-like proteins” (Table 3). Sativin is considered to be a type 1 RIP candidate, because of its amino acid sequence similarity of 48% to α-pisavin and β-pisavin [352], which are classified as type 1 RIPs as mentioned above. CIP-34 is the major protein of a 100 kDa protein complex with an unknown structure [360]. In Girbés et al. [7], it is indeed classified as a classical type 1 RIP, but it might be better to assign CIP-34 to the peculiar type 1 RIPs, because it is larger than other type 1 RIPs and it consists of protein domains with an unknown structure and function. To be grouped into the RIPs, however, the N-glycosidase activity of CIP-34 has to be detected. Thus, it is classified as type 1 RIP candidate until further notice. Panaxagin from Panax ginseng and quinqueginsin from Panax quinquefolius are two other proteins that differ from the classical type 1 RIPs with regard to molecular weight, structure, and functionality. Both panaxagin and quinqueginsin are homodimeric proteins with molecular weights of 52 kDa and 53 kDa, respectively [110,111]. The amino acid sequence of panaxagin and quinqueginsin show similarities with both RNases and type 1 RIPs, and on the basis of their high translation-inhibitory activities of 0.26 nM and 0.28 nM, respectively, they are classified as RIPs, where the authors proposed the denomination “dimeric type 1 RIP”. Due to their unusual dimeric structure, they can also be considered as peculiar type 1 RIPs. As mentioned above, the N-glycosidase activity of a protein needs to be detected in order to be classified as an RIP, but this was not possible for either panaxagin or quinqueginsin, because they both show strong RNase activity destroying the ribosomes. Therefore, both panaxagin and quinqueginsin are considered as peculiar type 1 RIP candidates until the whole amino acid sequence is analyzed, which will or will not show the conserved amino acids of the active site region. SoRIP2 from Spinacia oleraceae is a type 1 RIP candidate, because the N-glycosidase activity assay was not performed, but the amino acid sequence shows similarities to the shiga/ricin toxic domain [106]. Interestingly, SoRIP2 only shows low sequence similarity with SoRIP1, another protein from Spinacia oleraceae that is classified as type 1 RIP. Boerhaavia inhibitor from Boerhaavia diffusa was described as a virus inhibitor without mentioning any more details about the inhibitory activity of rabbit reticulocyte lysate or N-glycosidase activity [371,372]. But the size of 16–20 kDa and the fact that antiserum against the type 1 RIP MAP from Mirabilis jalapa giving positive reaction with Boerhaavia diffusa extract [373], led us to the conclusion to denote Boerhaavia inhibitor as a RIP 1 candidate. CA-SRI from Clerodendrum aculeatum is like Boerhaavia inhibitor an antiviral protein that induces systemic resistance [358]. Neither the inhibition of translation of rabbit reticulocyte lysate nor the N-glycosidase was demonstrated, but the size of 34 kDa and the amino acid sequence homology of 54% [359] to the type 1 RIP PAP from Phytolacca americana make CA-SRI a RIP 1 candidate. CF-RIP is a type 1 RIP candidate from Cucumis ficifolius that was obtained by cloning and sequencing the cDNA [159]. To be classified as type 1 RIP, native CF-RIP has to be isolated as well as the N-glycosidase activity has to be detected. Compared with that, the enzymatic activity of ε-momorcharin from Momordica charantia indeed was detected, but it was not denominated as a classical type 1 RIP, because its IC50 of 170 nM is too low. Thus, the authors supposed significant structural dissimilarities of ε-momorcharin from the classical type 1 RIPs [203]. Another protein showing N-glycosidase activity, but is not classified as type 1 RIP, is TRIP from Nicotiana tabacum, because TRIP releases less adenine compared to type 1 RIPs [461]. It shows almost all the characteristics of type 1 RIPs instead of sequence similarity with other type 1 RIPs, wherein it should be mentioned that only 15 internal amino acids were analyzed. The authors classified TRIP as a RIP-like protein, but the fact that it shows superoxide dismutase activity, that is well known for RIPs [23], led us to the proposal to classify TRIP as a type 1 RIP candidate until the whole amino acid sequence is analyzed, which will or will not show the conserved amino acids of type 1 RIPs. Another protein from Nicotiana tabacum is CIP31 that shows a distinct mechanism of action as RIPs. In addition, not only is its N-terminal amino acid sequence different from the RIPs, but it is also only expressed with the presence of Cinchonaglykoside C (1) [460]. Thus, it is denominated as an RIP-like protein. Because of cleaving supercoiled DNA by a crude extract of seeds from Phaleria macrocarpa, it was assumed that at least one RIP is included in this extract [462], but there were no more details given about this assumed RIP. The same applies to arborvitae RIP, where it is only known that there is probably a RIP synthesized by arborvitae [272], but we could only find the abstract of this paper during our investigation and in the abstract it is not clarified whether it is a RIP or just an RNase. Due to a lack of any further details, we propose to denominate these assumed RIPs as RIP candidates without mentioning the more detailed denomination RIP 1 or RIP 2 candidate. The same applies to leonurin from Leonurus japonicus, for which we did not find any further information as well [362]. As mentioned in the introduction, some lectins were found from several Adenia species [45], of which the lectins from Adenia lanceolata and from Adenia stenodactyla were classified later as type 2 RIPs and were denominated as lanceolin and stenodactylin [391], respectively. The lectin from Adenia goetzei is a type 2 RIP as well, because it was found that it is active as glycosylase, which releases adenine from herring sperm DNA [464]. On the other hand, the lectins from Adenia ellenbeckii, Adenia glauca, Adenia keramanthus, Adenia spinosa, and Adenia venenata indeed consist of two protein chains and inhibit translation in a cell free system, but the N-glycosidase activity was not analyzed. Thus, they should be considered as type 2 RIP candidates. BDA from Bryonia cretica subsp. Dioica, malanin from Malania oleifera, TCSL from Trichosanthes cucumerina, TDSL from Trichosanthes dioica, and TKL-1 from Trichosanthes kirilowii are also two-chain lectins that cannot be clearly classified as type 2 RIPs. All of them have the typical molecular weight of type 2 RIPs and consist of two protein chains resembling the structure of type 2 RIPs that was even shown by X-ray crystallography [260], but the N-glycosidase activity assay was not performed excluding BDA. BDA, however, was not inhibitory in the highest tested concentration (IC50 > 1500 nM; [73]). These samples show that proteins having both a similar molecular weight and molecular structure, but lacking N-glycosidase activity, cannot be classified as classical type 2 RIPs. Therefore, we propose to classify BDA as a type 2 RIP-like protein and malanin, TCSL, and TDSL as type 2 RIP candidates, because the N-glycosidase activity of these proteins could neither be confirmed nor excluded to date. At this point two other proteins should be mentioned differing from the classical type 2 RIPs or two-chain lectins with regard to the molecular structure: Foetidissimin from Cucurbita foetidissima and SGSL from Trichosanthes anguina. Foetidissimin indeed inhibits translation by acting as N-glycosidase and it consists of two protein chains, but these chains are not held together through a disulphide bridge [157]. This is hitherto unique for type 2 RIPs and, therefore, we propose to classify foetidissimin as a peculiar type 2 RIP on the basis of the denomination for the peculiar type 1 RIP b-32. The A-chain of SGSL is cleaved obtaining two non-covalently linked components Aα and Aβ-s-s-B. Thus, the nucleotide and carbohydrate-binding sites of SGSL are changed and compared to cinphorin, SGSL does not show N-glycosidase activity, which is due to the cleaved A-chain, but, as X-ray crystallography shows a very similar molecular structure compared to type 2 RIPs, SGSL is classified as a type 2 RIP-like protein. As mentioned above, cleaving processes are not unusual for RIPs, so it was shown that TrSNA-I and TrSNA-If, both lectins from Sambucus nigra, are cleaving products of the type 2 RIPs SNA-I and SNA-If, respectively. This supports the hypothesis that certain lectins and type 2 RIPs must be evolutionarily related.

3.3. Dimeric, Tetrameric, and Octameric Type 2 RIPs and Dimeric Lectins

Most of the dimeric, tetrameric, and octameric type 2 RIPs or dimeric lectins are synthesized by plant species belonging to the Sambucus genus, which are reviewed in Ferreras et al. [29] and Ferreras et al. [72]. In these reviews, the proteins are grouped in “heterodimeric type 2 RIPs”, “tetrameric type 2 RIPs”, “monomeric lectins”, and “homodimeric lectins”. The heterodimeric type 2 RIPs represent the classical type 2 RIPs consisting of one A-chain and one B-chain linked together through a disulphide bridge [A-s-s-B]. Tetrameric type 2 RIPs consist of four protein chains and, therefore, the proposal was made to denominate these proteins as type 4 RIPs [306]. But that would mean that there are type 1, type 2, and type 4 RIPs, but no type 3 RIPs, because they were renamed peculiar type 1 RIPs, which may lead to confusion. Thus, we agree with the term “tetrameric type 2 RIPs”. These RIPs are subdivided into two groups. One of those consist of two [A-s-s-B]-units linked together non-covalently, which can also be considered dimeric classical type 2 RIPs ([A-s-s-B]2). It should be mentioned that the [A-s-s-B]-units can be different, e.g., in RCA from Ricinus communis ([A-s-s-B]α[A-s-s-B]β; [316,323]). The other group of tetrameric type 2 RIPs includes proteins with an extra disulphide bond between the two B-chains [A-s-s-B-s-s-B-s-s-A]. In Ferreras et al. [72], SNA-I and SNA-If were grouped herein, but it was shown that both native SNA-I and native SNA-If occur as a 240 kDa protein having the structure [A-s-s-B-s-s-B-s-s-A]2 [69]. Thus, these proteins can also be considered as dimeric tetrameric type 2 RIPs linked non-covalently, but we propose the denomination octameric type 2 RIPs. PMRIPt from Polygonatum multiflorum and abrin from Abrus precatorius are also octameric type 2 RIPs consisting of four [A-s-s-B]-units, which are linked non-covalently as well ([A-s-s-B]4; [117,328]). They can also be considered as tetrameric classical type 2 RIPs. Dimerization or oligomerization is a common behavior of purified and concentrated proteins. To avoid any confusion, the denomination of tetrameric type 2 RIPs with the structure [A-s-s-B]2 and octameric type 2 RIPs is not meant as a real classification, because this would separate closely related type 2 proteins such as SNAI and SSA or abrin and pulchellin. We grouped those proteins in Table 4 as an addition to Table 1 to explain the bigger molecular weights and to show their native form in which they have been detected.
Table 4

Dimeric, tetrameric, and octameric type 2 RIPs and dimeric lectins.

StructureProteinSourceMwReferences
Octameric [A-s-s-B-s-s-B-s-s-A]2SNA-ISambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)240 kDa[66,69]
SNA-IfSambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)240 kDa[69]
Octameric [A-s-s-B]4AbrinAbrus precatorius (Fabaceae)260 kDa[328]
PMRIPtPolygonatum multiflorum (Asparagaceae)240 kDa[117]
Tetrameric [A-s-s-B-s-s-B-s-s-A]SEASambucus ebulus (Adoxaceae)135,630 Da[50]
SNAflu-ISambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)subunits of 30–33 kDa[71,72]
SRASambucus sieboldiana (Adoxaceae)120 kDa[79]
SSASambucus sieboldiana (Adoxaceae)160 kDa[81]
Tetrameric [A-s-s-B]2APAAbrus precatorius (Fabaceae)126–134 kDa[315,341,342,345]
Hura crepitans latex lectinHura crepitans (Euphorbiaceae)112 kDa[279]
MCLMomordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)115–124 kDa[207,218,219,220]
ML-IViscum album (Santalaceae)115–125 kDa[445,447,450,451,452]
Nigrin bSambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)120 kDa[58]
Nigrin fSambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)120 kDa[62]
SNA-I’Sambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)120 kDa[67]
Tetrameric [A-s-s-B]α[A-s-s-B]βRCARicinus communis (Euphorbiaceae)118–130 kDa[316,323]
Homodimeric lectins [B]2E. characias lectinEuphorbia characias (Euphorbiaceae)80 kDa[279]
Luffa acutangula fruit lectinLuffa acutangula (Cucurbitaceae)48 kDa[175]
Protein fraction 1Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)49 kDa[224]
Protein fraction 2Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae)49 kDa[224]
Sechium edule fruit lectinSechium edule (Cucurbitaceae)44 kDa[230]
SELldSambucus ebulus (Adoxaceae)67,906 Da[52]
SELfdSambucus ebulus (Adoxaceae)68 kDa[47]
SNAldSambucus nigra (Adoxaceae)n.a.[63]
Dimeric, tetrameric, and octameric type 2 RIPs and dimeric lectins.

3.4. Non-Toxic Type 2 RIPs

For a long time, all type 2 RIPs were considered to be highly potent toxins, but, to date, there are also known type 2 RIPs, which are not or only less toxic in vivo, and therefore they are denominated as non-toxic type 2 RIPs (reviewed in [7,8], not listed in this review). Nearly all of them have lectin properties and show N-glycosidase activity in a cell-free system, so that these characteristics cannot be the reason for the missing in vivo-toxicity. SNLRP1 from Sambucus nigra for instance is a non-toxic type 2 RIP without lectin properties. On the other hand, nigrin b from Sambucus nigra has lectin properties but is non-toxic as well, because it is degraded rapidly and excreted by cells [8]. Articulatin D from Viscum articulatum is another type 2 RIP without lectin properties, but compared to SNLRP1, articulatin D is very toxic [455]. Thus, these examples show that the reasons for the vast differences in toxicity are not clearly understood. Nevertheless, non-toxic type 2 RIPs are quite interesting for anti-cancer therapy, because they may have a lower potential of side effects.

3.5. Demotion of Some RIPs

At last, it should be mentioned that there are some proteins, which were first classified as RIPs, but it was later shown that they act with a different mechanism of action for inhibiting translation than N-glycosidase. Melonin from Cucumis melo was first classified as type 1 RIP [465], but a few years later, it was found that it is a ribonuclease (RNase) that specifically degrades poly(C)- and cytidine-containing bonds [466]. Crotin I and crotin II, two proteins from Croton tiglium, were classified as type 1 RIPs as well [7], but for crotin II, it was found that it belongs to RNA hydrolases, which cleave a phosphodiester bond between G4325 and A4326 of 28S rRNA [10]. That is why crotin II is not listed in Table 1. Crotin I is a 40 kDa protein that does not fit into the type 1 RIP classification with regard to the molecular weight and in addition, its N-glycosidase activity was also not detected, because the corresponding assay was not performed [273,274]. Thus, the N-glycosidase activity cannot be excluded and, therefore, crotin I should be classified as a type 1 RIP candidate. At this point, it should be mentioned that there is a type 1 RIP with N-glycosidase activity against bacterial rRNA [277], which was denominated as crotin 2. The denomination of crotin II and crotin 2 may lead to confusion particularly in Girbés et al. [7], as crotin I and crotin II are also denominated as crotin 2 and crotin 3, respectively. For that reference, however, we could not find any proof and, therefore, in Table 1, we listed crotin I and crotin 2 separately, but we did not list crotin II on the basis of the reasons mentioned above and also excluded crotin 3, because too little information exists. The question remains as to whether there are more RIPs which should be demoted.

4. Conclusions

Hitherto, several approaches concerning the nomenclature of RIPs were proposed. Most of the proteins were denominated by using a part of the genus or species name followed with the ending “-in”, e.g., agrostin from Agrostemma githago or ocymoidin from Saponaria ocymoides. If there is more than one RIP synthesized by the same plant, the denominations are followed by an Arabic or Roman numeral, e.g., asparin 1 and asparin 2 from Asparagus officinalis or pulchellin PI, pulchellin PII, and pulchellin PIII from Abrus pulchellus. The numerals, however, can also represent the peak number, in which the proteins were eluted, e.g., agrostin 2, agrostin 5, and agrostin 6 [112]. Some proteins are denominated with additional information about their molecular weight, e.g., dianthin29 from Dianthus barbatus with a size of 29 kDa, or the tissue they are obtained from, e.g., nigrin b from the bark of Sambucus nigra. There are also many proteins, which are denominated with abbreviations, mostly using the initials of the genus and species name, e.g., SEA (= Sambucus ebulus agglutinin) from Sambucus ebulus. At last, modeccin 4B and modeccin 6B from Adenia digitata were denominated by using the material for their isolation. Modeccin 4B was isolated by affinity chromatography on Sepharose 4B and modeccin 6B was isolated by affinity chromatography on acid-treated Sepharose 6B [390]. In 1996, an unambiguous nomenclature was already demanded [58], but today there is still not a uniform classification existing for RIPs. This may be due to the fact that there are several exceptions of RIPs and RIP related proteins, which cannot be grouped into the classical type 1 or type 2 RIPs concerning the structure and/or function of these proteins. Besides the small RIPs, which were already designated in 1996 [205], we propose the term “RIP candidate” for those proteins, which are structurally related to the classical type 1 and type 2 RIPs and/or inhibit translation, but were not analyzed with regard to their N-glyosidase activity. On the other hand, ε-momorcharin is also a RIP candidate [203], which is indeed active as N-glycosidase but shows significant structural dissimilarities from the classical RIPs. These “RIP candidates” can be subdivided into small type 1 RIP (e.g., cucurmoschin), type 1 RIP (e.g., sativin) or type 2 RIP candidates (e.g., malanin) concerning the molecular weight and structure. For the denomination of those proteins which cannot be grouped into the classic small RIPs, type 1 RIPs or type 2 RIPs due to their unusual structure, but act as N-glycosidase (b-32 and JIP60), we agree with the term “peculiar RIP” [7,8], and, therefore, we add the peculiar type 2 RIP foetidissimin, which lacks the disulphide bridge between the A-chain and B-chain. Because of the dimeric structure of panaxagin and quinqueginsin, they should be considered as peculiar type 1 RIPs, or, more precisely, as peculiar type 1 RIP candidates, because the N-glycosidase activity could not be analyzed, but they show amino acid sequence similarities with other type 1 RIPs. All other proteins, which are structurally related to RIPs but lack N-glycosidase activity, should be referred to as RIP 1-like or RIP 2-like proteins/lectins.
  383 in total

Review 1.  The history of ricin, abrin and related toxins.

Authors:  Sjur Olsnes
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Purification of a new ribosome-inactivating protein from the seeds of Cinnamomum porrectum and characterization of the RNA N-glycosidase activity of the toxic protein.

Authors:  X D Li; W Y Liu; C L Niu
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.915

3.  Over-expression of OSRIP18 increases drought and salt tolerance in transgenic rice plants.

Authors:  Shu-Ye Jiang; Ritu Bhalla; Rengasamy Ramamoorthy; Hong-Fen Luan; Prasanna Nori Venkatesh; Minne Cai; Srinivasan Ramachandran
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Purification, characterization and cloning of antiviral/ribosome inactivating protein from Amaranthus tricolor leaves.

Authors:  Sribash Roy; P Sadhana; Mehbuba Begum; Sushil Kumar; M L Lodha; H C Kapoor
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Trichokirin, a ribosome-inactivating protein from the seeds of Trichosanthes kirilowii Maximowicz. Purification, partial characterization and use for preparation of immunotoxins.

Authors:  P Casellas; D Dussossoy; A I Falasca; L Barbieri; J C Guillemot; P Ferrara; A Bolognesi; P Cenini; F Stirpe
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1988-10-01

6.  Volkensin from Adenia volkensii Harms (kilyambiti plant), a type 2 ribosome-inactivating protein.

Authors:  Angela Chambery; Antimo Di Maro; Maurilia M Monti; Fiorenzo Stirpe; Augusto Parente
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2004-01

7.  Fusidic acid-dependent ribosomal complexes protect Escherichia coli ribosomes from the action of the type 1 ribosome-inactivating protein crotin 2.

Authors:  R Iglesias; C Escarmis; C Alegre; J M Ferreras; T Girbés
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Wheat ribosome-inactivating proteins: seed and leaf forms with different specificities and cofactor requirements.

Authors:  A J Massiah; M R Hartley
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Studies on the variants of the protein toxins ricin and abrin.

Authors:  R Hegde; S K Podder
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1992-02-15

10.  Isolation of crystalline ricin.

Authors:  M KUNITZ; M R McDONALD
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1948-09-10       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  35 in total

1.  Contribution of an unusual CDR2 element of a single domain antibody in ricin toxin binding affinity and neutralizing activity.

Authors:  Michael J Rudolph; David J Vance; Simon Kelow; Siva Krishna Angalakurthi; Sophie Nguyen; Simon A Davis; Yinghui Rong; C Russell Middaugh; David D Weis; Roland Dunbrack; John Karanicolas; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Heterologous Production and Functional Characterization of Ageritin, a Novel Type of Ribotoxin Highly Expressed during Fruiting of the Edible Mushroom Agrocybe aegerita.

Authors:  Annageldi Tayyrov; Sophie Azevedo; Robert Herzog; Eva Vogt; Simon Arzt; Peter Lüthy; Pie Müller; Martin Rühl; Florian Hennicke; Markus Künzler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  High-Resolution Epitope Positioning of a Large Collection of Neutralizing and Nonneutralizing Single-Domain Antibodies on the Enzymatic and Binding Subunits of Ricin Toxin.

Authors:  David J Vance; Jacqueline M Tremblay; Yinghui Rong; Siva Krishna Angalakurthi; David B Volkin; C Russell Middaugh; David D Weis; Charles B Shoemaker; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-12-05

4.  Structural analysis of nested neutralizing and non-neutralizing B cell epitopes on ricin toxin's enzymatic subunit.

Authors:  Michael J Rudolph; David J Vance; Michael S Cassidy; Yinghui Rong; Charles B Shoemaker; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

5.  Mode of Action of the Catalytic Site in the N-Terminal Ribosome-Inactivating Domain of JIP60.

Authors:  Michal Przydacz; Rhian Jones; Helen G Pennington; Gerard Belmans; Maya Bruderer; Rachel Greenhill; Tia Salter; Peter A D Wellham; Ernesto Cota; Pietro D Spanu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Construction of Minicircle Suicide Genes Coding for Ribosome-Inactivating Proteins.

Authors:  Alexander Sonntag; Hardy Mitdank; Alexander Weng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Progress and challenges associated with the development of ricin toxin subunit vaccines.

Authors:  David J Vance; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.217

8.  Purification, characterization and fine sugar specificity of a N-Acetylgalactosamine specific lectin from Adenia hondala.

Authors:  Mamta Sharma; Prajna Hegde; Kavita Hiremath; Vishwanath Reddy H; A S Kamalanathan; Bale M Swamy; Shashikala R Inamdar
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 9.  Three Selected Edible Crops of the Genus Momordica as Potential Sources of Phytochemicals: Biochemical, Nutritional, and Medicinal Values.

Authors:  Mashudu Muronga; Cristina Quispe; Phumudzo P Tshikhudo; Titus A M Msagati; Fhatuwani N Mudau; Miquel Martorell; Bahare Salehi; Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis; Usman Sunusi; Ramla Muhammad Kamal; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Ebulin l Is Internalized in Cells by Both Clathrin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms and Does Not Require Clathrin or Dynamin for Intoxication.

Authors:  Rosario Iglesias; José M Ferreras; Alicia Llorente; Lucía Citores
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.