Literature DB >> 26004506

On growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms using maximally inscribed spheres.

H Gharahi1, B A Zambrano1, C Lim2, J Choi3, W Lee4, S Baek5.   

Abstract

The maximum diameter, total volume of the abdominal aorta, and its growth rate are usually regarded as key factors for making a decision on the therapeutic operation time for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patient. There is, however, a debate on what is the best standard method to measure the diameter. Currently, two dominant methods for measuring the maximum diameter are used. One is measured on the planes perpendicular to the aneurism's central line (orthogonal diameter) and the other one is measured on the axial planes (axial diameter). In this paper, another method called 'inscribed-spherical diameter' is proposed to measure the diameter. The main idea is to find the diameter of the largest sphere that fits within the aorta. An algorithm is employed to establish a centerline for the AAA geometries obtained from a set of longitudinal scans obtained from South Korea. This centerline, besides being the base of the inscribed spherical method, is used for the determination of orthogonal and axial diameter. The growth rate parameters are calculated in different diameters and the total volume and the correlations between them are studied. Furthermore, an exponential growth pattern is sought for the maximum diameters over time to examine a nonlinear growth pattern of AAA expansion both globally and locally. The results present the similarities and discrepancies of these three methods. We report the shortcomings and the advantages of each method and its performance in the quantification of expansion rates. While the orthogonal diameter measurement has an ability of capturing a realistic diameter, it fluctuated. On the other hand, the inscribed sphere diameter method tends to underestimate the diameter measurement but the growth rate can be bounded in a narrow region for aiding prediction capability. Moreover, expansion rate parameters derived from this measurement exhibit good correlation with each other and with growth rate of volume. In conclusion, although the orthogonal method remains the main method of measuring the diameter of an abdominal aorta, employing the idea of maximally inscribed spheres provides both a tool for generation of the centerline, and an additional parameter for quantification of aneurysmal growth rates.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysms; Exponential growth; Korean patients; Orthogonal diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004506      PMCID: PMC4478225          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  35 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J B Chang; T A Stein; J P Liu; M E Dunn
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Ruptured arteriosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms. A pathologic and clinical study.

Authors:  R C Darling
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The abnormal aorta: a statistical definition and strategy for monitoring change.

Authors:  G M Grimshaw; J M Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study.

Authors:  M P Nevitt; D J Ballard; J W Hallett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J L Cronenwett; T F Murphy; G B Zelenock; W M Whitehouse; S M Lindenauer; L M Graham; L E Quint; T M Silver; J C Stanley
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  R Limet; N Sakalihassan; A Albert
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  S C Nicholls; J B Gardner; M H Meissner; H K Johansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Influence of selective management on the prognosis and the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  C K Schewe; H P Schweikart; G Hammel; F A Spengel; N Zöllner; W G Zoller
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-08

9.  Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  F A Lederle; S E Wilson; G R Johnson; D B Reinke; F N Littooy; C W Acher; L M Messina; D J Ballard; H J Ansel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Predicting the growth of aortic aneurysms: a comparison of linear vs exponential models.

Authors:  Y Hirose; S Hamada; M Takamiya
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  12 in total

1.  Association of Intraluminal Thrombus, Hemodynamic Forces, and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion Using Longitudinal CT Images.

Authors:  Byron A Zambrano; Hamidreza Gharahi; ChaeYoung Lim; Farhad A Jaberi; Jongeun Choi; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Computational Growth and Remodeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Constrained by the Spine.

Authors:  Mehdi Farsad; Shahrokh Zeinali-Davarani; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm growth using patient-oriented growth models with two-step Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Emrah Akkoyun; Sebastian T Kwon; Aybar C Acar; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Patient-Specific Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion Using Bayesian Calibration.

Authors:  Liangliang Zhang; Zhenxiang Jiang; Jongeun Choi; Chae Young Lim; Tapabrata Maiti; Seungik Baek
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Decision Tree Based Classification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Geometry Quantification Measures.

Authors:  Shalin A Parikh; Raymond Gomez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Association of vortical structures and hemodynamic parameters for regional thrombus accumulation in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Byron A Zambrano; Hamidreza Gharahi; Chae Young Lim; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Image-based computational assessment of vascular wall mechanics and hemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients.

Authors:  Byron A Zambrano; Nathan A McLean; Xiaodan Zhao; Ju-Le Tan; Liang Zhong; C Alberto Figueroa; Lik Chuan Lee; Seungik Baek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Machine learning approaches to surrogate multifidelity Growth and Remodeling models for efficient abdominal aortic aneurysmal applications.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Jiang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.698

9.  Defining a master curve of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and its potential utility of clinical management.

Authors:  Emrah Akkoyun; Hamidreza Gharahi; Sebastian T Kwon; Byron A Zambrano; Akshay Rao; Aybar C Acar; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 7.027

10.  Intraluminal thrombus effect on the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms by using a multistate continuous-time Markov chain model.

Authors:  Liangliang Zhang; Byron A Zambrano; Jongeun Choi; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek; Chae Young Lim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.