Literature DB >> 26003169

Extreme chromosomal instability forecasts improved outcome in ER-negative breast cancer: a prospective validation cohort study from the TACT trial.

M Jamal-Hanjani1, R A'Hern2, N J Birkbak3, P Gorman1, E Grönroos4, S Ngang1, P Nicola1, L Rahman1, E Thanopoulou4, G Kelly4, P Ellis5, P Barrett-Lee6, S R D Johnston7, J Bliss2, R Roylance8, C Swanton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal instability (CIN) has been shown to be associated with drug resistance and poor clinical outcome in several cancer types. However, in oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer we have previously demonstrated that extreme CIN is associated with improved clinical outcome, consistent with a negative impact of CIN on tumour fitness and growth. The aim of this current study was to validate this finding using previously defined CIN thresholds in a much larger prospective cohort from a randomised, controlled, clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As a surrogate measurement of CIN, dual centromeric fluorescence in situ hybridisation was performed for both chromosomes 2 and 15 on 1173 tumours from the breast cancer TACT trial (CRUK01/001). Each tumour was scored manually and the mean percentage of cells deviating from the modal centromere number was used to define four CIN groups (MCD1-4), where tumours in the MCD4 group were defined as having extreme CIN.
RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis of disease-free survival, with a median follow-up of 91 months, increasing CIN was associated with improved outcome in patients with ER-negative cancer (P trend = 0.03). A similar pattern was seen in ER-negative/HER2-negative cancers (Ptrend = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective validation cohort study further substantiated the association between extreme CIN and improved outcome in ER-negative breast cancers. Identifying such patients with extreme CIN may help distinguish good from poor prognostic groups, and therefore support treatment and risk stratification in this aggressive breast cancer subtype.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; chromosomal instability; intratumour heterogeneity; modal centromere deviation; prognostic biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003169     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  31 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability upregulates interferon in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Robert F Lera; Rachel E Yan; Fen Guo; Kim Oxendine; Vanessa L Horner; Yang Hu; Jun Wan; Ryan J Mattison; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Genetic and non-genetic clonal diversity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  James R M Black; Nicholas McGranahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 4.  The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Living in CIN: Mitotic Infidelity and Its Consequences for Tumor Promotion and Suppression.

Authors:  Laura C Funk; Lauren M Zasadil; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Chromosomal instability sensitizes patient breast tumors to multipolar divisions induced by paclitaxel.

Authors:  Christina M Scribano; Jun Wan; Karla Esbona; John B Tucker; Amber Lasek; Amber S Zhou; Lauren M Zasadil; Ryan Molini; Jonathan Fitzgerald; Angela M Lager; Jennifer J Laffin; Kayla Correia-Staudt; Kari B Wisinski; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Ruth O'Regan; Stephanie M McGregor; Amy M Fowler; Richard J Chappell; Tim S Bugni; Mark E Burkard; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Aneuploidy increases resistance to chemotherapeutics by antagonizing cell division.

Authors:  John Michael Replogle; Wen Zhou; Adrianna E Amaro; James M McFarland; Mariana Villalobos-Ortiz; Jeremy Ryan; Anthony Letai; Omer Yilmaz; Jason Sheltzer; Stephen J Lippard; Uri Ben-David; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Does estrogen receptor determination affect prognosis in early stage breast cancers?

Authors:  Nilufer Bulut; Kadri Altundag
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

9.  APC/C Dysfunction Limits Excessive Cancer Chromosomal Instability.

Authors:  James O Patterson; Sally Dewhurst; Laurent Sansregret; Carlos López-García; André Koch; Nicholas McGranahan; William Chong Hang Chao; David J Barry; Andrew Rowan; Rachael Instrell; Stuart Horswell; Michael Way; Michael Howell; Martin R Singleton; René H Medema; Paul Nurse; Mark Petronczki; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 10.  Chromosomal Instability in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Mateus de Oliveira Lisboa; Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman; Ana Teresa Schmid-Braz; Aline Rangel-Pozzo; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.