Literature DB >> 34516829

Chromosomal instability sensitizes patient breast tumors to multipolar divisions induced by paclitaxel.

Christina M Scribano1, Jun Wan2, Karla Esbona3, John B Tucker4, Amber Lasek5, Amber S Zhou1, Lauren M Zasadil1, Ryan Molini5, Jonathan Fitzgerald1, Angela M Lager6, Jennifer J Laffin6, Kayla Correia-Staudt3, Kari B Wisinski3, Amye J Tevaarwerk3, Ruth O'Regan3, Stephanie M McGregor7, Amy M Fowler8,9,10, Richard J Chappell11, Tim S Bugni12, Mark E Burkard3,10,13, Beth A Weaver5,10,13.   

Abstract

Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. However, its mechanism of cytotoxicity is incompletely understood and not all patients benefit from treatment. We show that patients with breast cancer did not accumulate sufficient intratumoral paclitaxel to induce mitotic arrest in tumor cells. Instead, clinically relevant concentrations induced multipolar mitotic spindle formation. However, the extent of early multipolarity did not predict patient response. Whereas multipolar divisions frequently led to cell death, multipolar spindles focused into bipolar spindles before division at variable frequency, and maintaining multipolarity throughout mitosis was critical to induce the high rates of chromosomal instability necessary for paclitaxel to elicit cell death. Increasing multipolar divisions in paclitaxel resulted in improved cytotoxicity. Conversely, decreasing paclitaxel-induced multipolar divisions reduced paclitaxel efficacy. Moreover, we found that preexisting chromosomal instability sensitized breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Both genetic and pharmacological methods of inducing chromosomal instability were sufficient to increase paclitaxel efficacy. In patients, the amount of pretreatment chromosomal instability directly correlated with taxane response in metastatic breast cancer such that patients with a higher rate of preexisting chromosomal instability showed improved response to taxanes. Together, these results support the use of baseline rates of chromosomal instability as a predictive biomarker for paclitaxel response. Furthermore, they suggest that agents that increase chromosomal instability or maintain multipolar spindles throughout mitosis will improve the clinical utility of paclitaxel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34516829      PMCID: PMC8612166          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd4811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  46 in total

1.  mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging.

Authors:  Daphne S Bindels; Lindsay Haarbosch; Laura van Weeren; Marten Postma; Katrin E Wiese; Marieke Mastop; Sylvain Aumonier; Guillaume Gotthard; Antoine Royant; Mark A Hink; Theodorus W J Gadella
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis and mitotic arrest assessed by serial fine-needle aspiration: implications for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  W F Symmans; M D Volm; R L Shapiro; A B Perkins; A Y Kim; S Demaria; H T Yee; H McMullen; R Oratz; P Klein; S C Formenti; F Muggia
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Beth A A Weaver; Alain D Silk; Cristina Montagna; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Taxol suppresses dynamics of individual microtubules in living human tumor cells.

Authors:  A M Yvon; P Wadsworth; M A Jordan
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Comparison of weekly versus every 3 weeks paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ta-Chen Huang; Toby C Campbell
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Relationship of extreme chromosomal instability with long-term survival in a retrospective analysis of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Roylance; David Endesfelder; Patricia Gorman; Rebecca A Burrell; Jil Sander; Ian Tomlinson; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Andrea L Richardson; Nicolai J Birkbak; Aron C Eklund; Julian Downward; Maik Kschischo; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex.

Authors:  Laura Hewitt; Anthony Tighe; Stefano Santaguida; Anne M White; Clifford D Jones; Andrea Musacchio; Stephen Green; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Mitotic block induced in HeLa cells by low concentrations of paclitaxel (Taxol) results in abnormal mitotic exit and apoptotic cell death.

Authors:  M A Jordan; K Wendell; S Gardiner; W B Derry; H Copp; L Wilson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Chromosome missegregation rate predicts whether aneuploidy will promote or suppress tumors.

Authors:  Alain D Silk; Lauren M Zasadil; Andrew J Holland; Benjamin Vitre; Don W Cleveland; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Milita Zaheed; Nicholas Wilcken; Melina L Willson; Dianne L O'Connell; Annabel Goodwin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-18
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The life cycle of polyploid giant cancer cells and dormancy in cancer: Opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Jinsong Liu; Na Niu; Xiaoran Li; Xudong Zhang; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Polo-Like Kinase 1 Regulates Chromosomal Instability and Paclitaxel Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Ju Hee Kim; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Mingji Quan; Yumi Oh; Sung-Yup Cho
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.922

3.  Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Andrew R Lynch; Nicholas L Arp; Amber S Zhou; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 4.  Centrosome Aberrations as Drivers of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katrina M Piemonte; Lindsey J Anstine; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.051

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.