Literature DB >> 31055701

Severe Maternal Morbidity, A Tale of 2 States Using Data for Action-Ohio and Massachusetts.

Elizabeth J Conrey1,2, Susan E Manning3,4,5, Cynthia Shellhaas6,7, Nicholas J Somerville5,8, Sarah L Stone5,9, Hafsatou Diop5, Kristin Rankin10, Dave Goodman3.   

Abstract

Purpose Describe how Ohio and Massachusetts explored severe maternal morbidity (SMM) data, and used these data for increasing awareness and driving practice changes to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Description For 2008-2013, Ohio used de-identified hospital discharge records and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify delivery hospitalizations. Massachusetts used existing linked data system infrastructure to identify delivery hospitalizations from birth certificates linked to hospital discharge records. To identify delivery hospitalizations complicated by one or more of 25 SMMs, both states applied an algorithm of ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Ohio calculated a 2013 SMM rate of 144 per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations; Massachusetts calculated a rate of 162. Ohio observed no increase in the SMM rate from 2008 to 2013; Massachusetts observed a 33% increase. Both identified disparities in SMM rates by maternal race, age, and insurance type. Assessment Ohio and Massachusetts engaged stakeholders, including perinatal quality collaboratives and maternal mortality review committees, to share results and raise awareness about the SMM rates and identified high-risk populations. Both states are applying findings to inform strategies for improving perinatal outcomes, such as simulation training for obstetrical emergencies, licensure rules for maternity units, and a focus on health equity. Conclusion Despite data access differences, examination of SMM data informed public health practice in both states. Ohio and Massachusetts maximized available state data for SMM investigation, which other states might similarly use to understand trends, identify high risk populations, and suggest clinical or population level interventions to improve maternal morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31055701      PMCID: PMC6610709          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-019-02744-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  24 in total

1.  Decisions required for operating a maternal mortality review committee: the California experience.

Authors:  Elliott K Main
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Near miss maternal mortality in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Haywood L Brown; Maria Small; Yhenneko J Taylor; Monique Chireau; Daniel L Howard
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Prepregnancy obesity trends among low-income women, United States, 1999-2008.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrea J Sharma; Shin Y Kim; Sohyun Park; Karen Dalenius; Patricia L Brindley; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

4.  Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991-2003.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Andrea P Mackay; Cynthia J Berg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Susan F Meikle; Samuel F Posner; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-10

6.  Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Andreea A Creanga; Elena V Kuklina
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Revival of a core public health function: state- and urban-based maternal death review processes.

Authors:  David Goodman; Caroline Stampfel; Andreea A Creanga; William M Callaghan; Tegan Callahan; Erin Bonzon; Cynthia Berg; Violanda Grigorescu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Reducing maternal deaths through state maternal mortality review.

Authors:  Sarah J Kilpatrick; Patricia Prentice; Robin L Jones; Stacie Geller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Morbidity and mortality in pregnancy: laying the groundwork for safe motherhood.

Authors:  Stacie E Geller; Suzanne M Cox; William M Callaghan; Cynthia J Berg
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

10.  A scoring system identified near-miss maternal morbidity during pregnancy.

Authors:  Stacie E Geller; Deborah Rosenberg; Suzanne Cox; Monique Brown; Louise Simonson; Sarah Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maternal Mortality and Public Health Programs: Evidence from Florida.

Authors:  Patrick Bernet; Gulcin Gumus; Sharmila Vishwasrao
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Maternal death: lessons for anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  A Walls; F Plaat; A M Delgado
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  Race, Medicaid Coverage, and Equity in Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Clare C Brown; Caroline E Adams; Jennifer E Moore
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.